Securing Remote State Estimation against Sequential Logic Attack of Sensor Data
Source abstract
Abstract
The SCADA system, which is widely used in the continuous monitoring and control of the physical process of modern critical infrastructure, relies on the feedback control loop. The remote state estimation system triggers the control algorithm or control condition of the controller according to the monitoring data returned by the sensor. The controller sends the control command to the actuator, and the actuator executes the command to control the physical process. Since SCADA system monitoring and control data are usually transmitted through unprotected wireless communication networks, attackers can use false sensor data to trigger control algorithms to make wrong decisions, disrupt the physical processing of the SCADA system, and cause huge economic losses, even casualties. We found an attack strategy based on the sequential logic of sensor data. This kind of attack changes the time logic or sequence logic of the response data, so that the false data detector can be successfully deceived. This would cause the remote state estimation system to trigger wrong control algorithms or control conditions, and eventually disrupt or destroy the physical process. This paper proposes a sequential signature scheme based on the one-time signature to secure the sequential logic and transmission of sensor data. The security analysis proves that the proposed scheme can effectively resist counterfeiting, forgery, denial, replay attacks, and selective forwarding attacks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Grid Security and Resilience · Advanced Malware Detection Techniques · Security and Verification in Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Computer and Communication, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China
Funding
National Nature Science Foundation of China
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. The Cyber-Physical Systems Revolution10.1109/MC.2018.1731058 ↗
2. Cyber-physical systems, internet of things and big data10.1016/j.future.2017.05.040 ↗
3. Cybersecurity in industrial control systems: Issues, technologies, and challenges10.1016/j.comnet.2019.106946 ↗
4. Architecture and security of SCADA systems: A review10.1016/j.ijcip.2021.100433 ↗
5. Extending the cyber-attack landscape for SCADA-based critical infrastructure10.1016/j.ijcip.2019.01.002 ↗
6. A Survey on SCADA Systems: Secure Protocols, Incidents, Threats and Tactics10.1109/COMST.2020.2987688 ↗
7. Caselli, M., Zambon, E., Petit, J., and Kargl, F. (2015, January 16–18). Modeling Message Sequences for Intrusion Detection in Industrial Control Systems. Proceedings of the International Conference on Critical Infrastructure Protection, Arlington, VA, USA.10.1007/978-3-319-26567-4_4 ↗
8. Fovino, I.N., Carcano, A., Murel, T.D.L., Trombetta, A., and Masera, M. (2010, January 20–23). Modbus/DNP3 State-Based Intrusion Detection System. Proceedings of the 2010 24th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, Perth, WA, Australia.10.1109/AINA.2010.86 ↗
9. Ellis, J., Fisher, D., Longstaff, T., Pesante, L., and Pethia, R. (1997). Report to the President’s Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection, Carnegie-Mellon Univ Pittsburgh PA Software Engineering Inst.10.21236/ADA324232 ↗
10. A Systems Theoretic Approach to the Security Threats in Cyber Physical Systems Applied to Stuxnet10.1109/TDSC.2015.2509994 ↗
11. Kleinmann, A., Amichay, O., Wool, A., Tenenbaum, D., Bar, O., and Lev, L. (2017, January 14–15). Stealthy Deception Attacks against SCADA Systems. Proceedings of the Computer Security, SECPRE 2017, CyberICPS 2017, Oslo, Norway.10.1007/978-3-319-72817-9_7 ↗
12. On PLC network security10.1016/j.ijcip.2018.05.004 ↗
13. An Enhanced Multi-Stage Semantic Attack against Industrial Control Systems10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2949645 ↗
14. Karimipour, H., and Dinavahi, V. (2017, January 14–17). On false data injection attack against dynamic state estimation on smart power grids. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Smart Energy Grid Engineering (SEGE), Oshawa, ON, Canada.10.1109/SEGE.2017.8052831 ↗
15. Khatibi, M., and Ahmed, S. (2018, January 19–22). Optimal resilient defense strategy against false data injection attacks on power system state estimation. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT), Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/ISGT.2018.8403330 ↗
16. An Optimal Linear Attack Strategy on Remote State Estimation10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.1719 ↗
17. Govil, N., Agrawal, A., and Tippenhauer, N.O. (2017, January 14–15). On Ladder Logic Bombs in Industrial Control Systems. Proceedings of the Computer Security, SECPRE 2017, CyberICPS 2017, Oslo, Norway.10.1007/978-3-319-72817-9_8 ↗
18. Guo, Z., Johansson, K.H., and Shi, L. (2016, January 27–29). A study of packet-reordering integrity attack on remote state estimation. Proceedings of the 35th IEEE Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Chengdu, China.10.1109/ChiCC.2016.7554505 ↗
19. IEEE Std 1815-2012, and IEEE Standard for Electric Power Systems Communications (2012). Distributed Network Protocol. Available online: https://standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/1815-2012.html.
20. LAMPORTL (1979). Constructing Digital Signatures from a One-Way Function, SRI International. Technical Report; Technical Report CSL-98.
21. Shor, W.P. (1994, January 20–22). Algorithms for quantum computation: Discrete logarithms and factoring. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Santa Fe, NM, USA.
22. Perrig, A. (2001, January 5–8). The BiBa one-time signature and broadcast authentication protocol. Proceedings of the ACM CCS, Philadelphia, PA, USA.10.1145/501983.501988 ↗
23. Reyzin, L., and Reyzin, N. (2002, January 3–5). Better than BiBa: Short one-time signatures with fast signing and verifying. Proceedings of the Information Security and Privacy Conference, Melbourne, Australia. LNCS 2384.10.1007/3-540-45450-0_11 ↗
24. Efficient one-time signature schemes for stream authentication
25. Mitzenmacher, M., and Perrig, A. (2002). Bounds and Improvements for BiBa Signature Schemes, Harvard University Computer Science Group. No. TR-02-02; Harvard University Computer Science Group Technical Report TR-02-02.
26. Wang, Q., Khurana, H., Huang, Y., and Nahrstedt, K. (2009, January 19–25). Time valid onetime signature for time-critical multicast data authentication. Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2009, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.10.1109/INFCOM.2009.5062037 ↗
27. Pieprzyk, J., Wang, H., and Xing, C. (2003, January 14–15). Multiple-time signature schemes against adaptive chosen message attacks. Proceedings of the Selected Areas in Cryptography, Ottawa, ON, Canada. LNCS 3000.10.1007/978-3-540-24654-1_7 ↗
28. Short One-Time Signatures10.3934/amc.2011.5.473 ↗
29. Kalach, K., and Safavi-Naini, R. (2015, January 12–14). An efficient post-quantum one-time signature scheme. Proceedings of the International Conference on Selected Areas in Cryptography, Sackville, NB, Canada.10.1007/978-3-319-31301-6_20 ↗
30. Abe, M., David, B., and Kohlweiss, M. (March, January 26). Tagged one-time signatures: Tight security and optimal tag size. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Public Key Cryptography, Nara, Japan.
31. Merkle, R. (1987, January 16–20). A digital signature based on a conventional encryption function. Proceedings of the Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO1987, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
32. A novel crypto processor architecture for chained Merkle signature scheme10.1016/j.micpro.2010.07.002 ↗
33. Katti, R.S., Sule, R., and Kavasseri, R.G. (2013, January 8–11). Multicast authentication in the smart grid with one-time signatures from sigma-protocols. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 4th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems, Philadelphia, PA, USA.10.1145/2502524.2502557 ↗
34. Multicast authentication in the smart grid with one-time signature10.1109/TSG.2011.2138172 ↗
35. Universally composable one-time signature and broadcast authentication
36. Groza, B., and Murvay, S. (2011, January 22–26). Secure broadcast with one-time signatures in controller area networks. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES), Vienna, Austria.10.1109/ARES.2011.62 ↗
37. Buchmann, J., Dahmen, E., Ereth, S., Hülsing, A., and Rückert, M. (2011, January 5–7). On the security of the Winternitz one-time signature scheme. Proceedings of the International Conference on Cryptology in Africa, Dakar, Senegal.10.1007/978-3-642-21969-6_23 ↗