Chemomechanical Properties of Electrospun Polyvinyl Acetate (PVAc) Fiber Mat and its Application in Water-Triggered Self-folding
Source abstract
Abstract
Environmental-stimulus-triggered self-folding mechanisms have found promising applications in many engineering fields. Recently, a water-activated self-folding procedure has been designed by using the electrospun polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) fiber mat which contains high tensile residual stresses in the vitrified fibers during the spinning processes. The water permeation initiates plasticization of PVAc fiber mat and leads to a material shrinkage. When water diffusion starts at the top surface of a PVAc sheet, a shrinkage variation along the diffusion pathway forms a bending hinge on the sheet, which has been demonstrated in 3D origami design. To capture the water-triggered plasticization mechanism and chemomechanical coupling deformation compatibility, a consistent finite deformation viscoplastic model is developed for the PVAc fiber mat under coupled chemomechanical loading conditions. The residual stress and ‘fixed’ strain are modeled through the unrecoverable plastic strain in the PVAc fiber mat. As water permeates into the PVAc fiber mat, the induced increase in mixing entropy lowers the glass transition temperature of the material, and results in a gradual relaxation of the fixed viscoplastic strain. A non-Fickian diffusion model suitable for glassy material is adopted to capture the water permeation in the PVAc fiber mat. After calibrated and validated by a series of experiments, the proposed model is implemented in ABAQUS software to simulate the water-activated self-folding of PVAc sheet. The numerical example for a typical origami design suggests a promising engineering application prospect.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Chen JY, et al. Gold nanocages: a novel glass of multifunctional nanomateirals for theranostric applications. Adv Func Mater. 2010;20(21):3684–94.10.1002/adfm.201001329 ↗
2. Small W, et al. Biomedical applicatoins of thermally activated shape memory polymers. J Mater Chem. 2010;20:3356–66.10.1039/b923717h ↗
3. Guo X, et al. Two- and three-dimensional folding of thin film single-crystalline silicon for photovoltaic power applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(48):20149–54.10.1073/pnas.0907390106 ↗
4. Basskik N, Stern, Gracias DH, Microassembly basedon hands free origami with bidirectional curvature. Appl Phys Lett, 2009. 95(091901)10.1063/1.3212896 ↗
5. Cho JH, Hu S, Gracias DH, Self-assembly of orthogonal three-axis sensors. Appl Phys Lett, 2008. 93(043505)10.1063/1.2965616 ↗
6. Leong TG, Zarafshar AM, Gracias DH. Three-dimensional fabrication at small size scales. Small. 2010;6(7):792–806.10.1002/smll.200901704 ↗
7. Mu X, et al. Photo-induced bending in a light-activated polymer laminated composite. Soft Matter. 2015;11(13):2673–82.10.1039/C4SM02592J ↗
8. Ryu J, et al. Photo-origami—Bending and folding polymers with light. Appl Phys Lett. 2012;100(16): 161908.10.1063/1.3700719 ↗
9. Yi YW, Liu C. Magnetic actuation of hinged microstructures. J Microeelectromech Syst. 1999;8:10–7.10.1109/84.749397 ↗
10. Guan J, et al. Self-folding of three-dimensional hydrogel microstructures. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109(49):23134–7.10.1021/jp054341g ↗
11. Leong TG, et al. Tetherless thermobiochemically actuated microgrippers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(3):703–8.10.1073/pnas.0807698106 ↗
12. Kalaitzidou K, Crosby AJ. Adaptive polymer particles. Appl Phys Lett, 2008; 93(041910).10.1063/1.2966338 ↗
13. Ge Q, Qi HJ, Dunn ML. Active materials by four-dimension printing. Appl Phys Lett, 2013;103(13).10.1063/1.4819837 ↗
14. Behl M, Razzaq MY, Lendlein A. Multifunctional shape-memory polymers. Adv Mater. 2010;22(31):3388–410.10.1002/adma.200904447 ↗
15. Leong TG, et al. Thin film stress driven self-folding of microstructured containers. Small. 2010;4(10):1605–9.10.1002/smll.200800280 ↗
16. Luchnikov V, Sydorenko O, Stamm M. self-rolled polymer and composite polymer/metal micro- and nanotubes with patterned inner walls. Adv Mater. 2005;17:1177–82.10.1002/adma.200401836 ↗
17. Kumar K, et al. A novel approach for the fabrication of silica and silica/metal hybrid microtubes. Chem Mater. 2009;21:4282–7.10.1021/cm901472x ↗
18. Li L, Tjong. Electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride-based fibrous scaffolds with piezoelectric characteristics for bone and neural tissue engineering. Nanomaterials, 2019;9(7):952.10.3390/nano9070952 ↗
19. Pignatelli C et al. Electrospun silk fibroin fibers for storage and controlled release of human platelet lysate. Acta Biomaterialia, 2018;S1742706118302289.10.1016/j.actbio.2018.04.025 ↗
20. Bao C, et al. Effects of electrospun submicron fibers in calcium phosphate cement scaffold on mechanical properties and osteogenic differentiation of umbilical cord stem cells. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(11):4037–44.10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.046 ↗
21. Chen S, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-laden, personalized 3D scaffolds with controlled structure and fiber alignment promote diabetic wound healing. Acta Biomater. 2020;108:153–67.10.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.035 ↗
22. Seif S, et al. Monitoring drug release from electrospun fibers using an in situ fiber-optic system. Dissolut Technol. 2016;23(2):6–11.10.14227/DT230216P6 ↗
23. Triyana K, et al. A highly sensitive safrole sensor based on polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) nanofiber-coated QCM. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):15407.10.1038/s41598-019-51851-0 ↗
24. Cordeiro C, Ng A, Ebendorff-Heidepriem H. Ultra-simplified single-step fabrication of microstructured optical fiber. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):9678.10.1038/s41598-020-66632-3 ↗
25. Azimi B et al., Electrospinning Piezoelectric Fibers for Biocompatible Devices. 2020: 190128710.1002/adhm.201901287 ↗
26. Viola G, et al. Bioinspired multiresonant acoustic devices based on electrospun piezoelectric polymeric nanofibers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(31):34643–57.10.1021/acsami.0c09238 ↗
27. Shafeeq VH, et al. Stimuli-Responsive Electrospun Piezoelectric Mats of Ethylene- co -vinyl Acetate–Millable Polyurethane–Nanohydroxyapatite Composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2021; 13(20)10.1021/acsami.1c02674 ↗
28. Mao Y, et al. Thermoviscoplastic behaviors of anisotropic shape memory elastomeric composites for cold programmed non-affine shape change. J Mech Phys Solids. 2015;85:219–44.10.1016/j.jmps.2015.09.003 ↗
29. Robertson JM, et al. Mechanically programmed shape change in laminated elastomeric composites. Soft Matter. 2015;11(28):5754–64.10.1039/C5SM01004G ↗
30. Alharbi HF et al. Viscoelastic behavior of core-shell structured nanofibers of PLA and PVA produced by coaxial electrospinning. Poly Test, 2018:S0142941818300989.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.02.026 ↗
31. Hammami I, et al. Electrical, morphology and structural properties of biodegradable nanocomposite polyvinyl-acetate/ cellulose nanocrystals. Mater Chem Phys. 2019;240: 122182.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122182 ↗
32. Ghanbari D, et al. Preparation of Polyvinyl Acetate (PVAc) and PVAc–Ag–Fe3O4 composite nanofibers by electro-spinning method. J Clusterence. 2016;27(4):1317–33.10.1007/s10876-016-1002-2 ↗
33. Adam G, Gibbs JH. On the temperature dependence of cooperative relaxation properties in glass-forming liquid. J Chem Phys. 1965;43:139–46.10.1063/1.1696442 ↗
34. Chow TS. Molecular Interpretation of the Glass Transition temperature of polymer-Diluent Systems. Macromolecules. 1980;13(2):362–4.10.1021/ma60074a029 ↗
35. Xiao R, Nguyen TD. Modeling the solvent-induced shape-memory behavior of glassy polymers. Soft Matter. 2013;9(39):9455–64.10.1039/c3sm51210j ↗
36. Lu HB, Leng JS, Du SY. A phenomenological approach for the chemo-responsive shape memory effect in amorphous polymers. Soft Matter. 2013;9(14):3851.10.1039/c3sm27539f ↗
37. Vijalapura PK, Govindjee S. Numerical simulation of coupled-stress case II diffusion in one dimension. J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys. 2003;41(18):2091–108.10.1002/polb.10551 ↗
38. Govindjee S, Simo JC. Coupled stress-diffusion: case II. J Mech Phys Solids. 1993;41(5):863–87.10.1016/0022-5096(93)90003-X ↗
39. Zhou QY, Argon AS, Cohen RE. Enhanced case-II diffusion of diluents into glassy polymers undergoing plastic flow. Polymer. 2001;42(2):613–21.10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00376-1 ↗
40. Neogi P. Diffusion in polymers. Taylor & Francis, 1996:184–205.
41. Westbrook KK, et al. A 3D finite deformation constitutive model for amorphous shape memory polymers: a multi-branch modeling approach for nonequilibrium relaxation processes. Mech Mater. 2011;43(12):853–69.10.1016/j.mechmat.2011.09.004 ↗
42. Tool AQ. Relation between inelastic deformability and thermal expansion of glass in its annealing range. J Am Ceram Soc. 1946;29:240–53.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1946.tb11592.x ↗
43. Tool AQ. Effect of heat-treatment on the density and constituttion of high-silica glasses of the borosilicate type. J Am Ceram Soc. 1948;31:177–86.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1948.tb14287.x ↗
44. Yu K, et al. A thermomechanical constitutive model for an epoxy based shape memory polymer and its parameter identifications. Mech Time-Dependent Mater. 2014;18(2):453–74.10.1007/s11043-014-9237-5 ↗
45. Mao Y, et al. A viscoelastic model for hydrothermally activated malleable covalent network polymer and its application in shape memory analysis. J Mech Phys Solids. 2019;127:239–65.10.1016/j.jmps.2019.03.016 ↗
46. Gurtin ME, Fried E, Anand L, The mechanics and thermodynamics of continua. Cambridge University Press, 2010.10.1017/CBO9780511762956 ↗
47. Rubinstein M, Colby RH, Polymer physics. Oxford University Press
48. Bouklas N, Landis CM, Huang R. A nonlinear, transient finite element method for coupled solvent diffusion and large deformation of hydrogels. J Mech Phys Solids. 2015;79:21–43.10.1016/j.jmps.2015.03.004 ↗
49. Chester SA, Anand L. A thermo-mechanically coupled theory for fluid permeation in elastomeric materials: application to thermally responsive gels. J Mech Phys Solids. 2011;59(10):1978–2006.10.1016/j.jmps.2011.07.005 ↗
50. Zhang J, et al. A finite element method for transient analysis of concurrent large deformation and mass transport in gels. J Appl Phys. 2009;105(9):93.10.1063/1.3106628 ↗
51. Hasan OA, Boyce MC. A constitutive model for the nonlinear viscoelastic viscoplastic behavior of glassy polymers. Polym Eng Sci. 1995;35(4):331–44.10.1002/pen.760350407 ↗
52. Yu K, Ge Q, Qi HJ. Reduced time as a unified parameter determining fixity and free recovery of shape memory polymers. Nat Commun. 2014;5(2):3066.10.1038/ncomms4066 ↗
53. Robertson JM, Mechanically Active Electrospun Materials. Thesis, Syracuse University, 2015.
54. Long KN, Dunn ML, Qi HJ. Mechanics of soft active materials with phase evolution. Int J Plast. 2010;26(4):603–16.10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.10.005 ↗