journal article·2009-08

Abrasive and diffusive tool wear FEM simulation

A. Attanasio, D. Umbrello

Publisher page

Abstract

In this paper, an adopted abrasive-diffusive wear model is proposed and implemented into a 3D Finite Element code to study the tool wear phenomenon. In particular, the Authors found that FE procedure based only on diffusive mechanism shown some problems when the extension on crater area was investigated. This can be related to the absence of the wear abrasion term on the utilized model. Therefore, in this work, the Authors improved the previous utilized tool wear model introducing into the sub-routine the abrasive term on the basis of Usui’s model. A series of 3D FEM simulations were conducted in order to estimate the tool wear development in turning operations. The adopted abrasive-diffusive wear model will give the possibility of correctly evaluating the tool wear of actual turning operations during both the initial transient phase, where the abrasive mechanism is dominant, and the steady-state phase, in which the diffusion is the main wear mechanism. The FEM results were compared with experimental data, obtained turning AISI 1045 steel with WIDIA P40 inserts, showing a satisfactory agreement.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Alloys Wear and Properties · Advanced machining processes and optimization · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (10)

Show source-provided references
1. Astakhov VP (2004) The assessment of cutting tool wear. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:637–64710.1016/j.ijmachtools.2003.11.006 ↗
2. Lim CYH, Lim SH, Lee KS (1999) Wear of TiC- coated carbide tools in dry turning. Wear 225–229:354–36710.1016/S0043-1648(98)00366-4 ↗
3. Ghosh R, Li PX, Fang XD, Jawahir IS (1995) An investigation of the effects of chip flow on tool-wear in machining with complex grooved tools. Wear 184(2):145–15410.1016/0043-1648(94)06572-1 ↗
4. Takeyama H, Murata T (1963) Basic investigations on tool wear. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 85:33–3810.1115/1.3667575 ↗
5. Shimada S, Tanaka H, Higuchi M, Yamaguchi T, Honda S, Obata K (2004) Thermo-chemical wear mechanism of diamond tool in machining of ferrous metals. CIRP Ann 53(1):57–6010.1016/S0007-8506(07)60644-1 ↗
6. Usui E, Shirakashi T, Kitagawa T (1978) Analytical prediction of three dimensional cutting process. Part 3. Cutting temperature and crater wear of carbide tool. Trans ASME 100:236–24310.1115/1.3453906 ↗
7. Filice L, Umbrello D, Micari F, Settineri L (2007) Wear modelling in mild steel orthogonal cutting when using uncoated carbide tools. Wear 262(5–6):545–55410.1016/j.wear.2006.06.022 ↗
8. Bouzakis K-D, Mirisidis I, Lili E, Michailidis N, Sampris A, Skordaris G, Pavlidou Erkens G, Wirth I (2006) Impact resistance of PVD films and milling performance of coated tools at various temperature levels. CIRP Ann 55(1):67–7010.1016/S0007-8506(07)60368-0 ↗
9. Attanasio A, Ceretti E, Rizzuti S, Umbrello D, Micari F (2008) 3D finite element analysis of tool wear in machining. CIRP Ann 57(1):61–6410.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.123 ↗
10. Mathew P (1989) Use of predicted cutting temperatures in determining tool performance. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 29(4):481–49710.1016/0890-6955(89)90066-7 ↗