journal article·2012-03

Compact and flexible optical sensor designed for on-line monitoring

Laurent Jourdainne, Rodrigue Matadi Boumbimba, Badi Triki, Michel Bouquey, René Muller, Pascal Hébraud, Pierre Pfeiffer

Publisher page

Abstract

A new on line optical sensor based on light scattering dedicated to real-time monitoring during processing of polymers blends and polymers nanocomposites has been developed. The sensor is designed to monitor the quality of a polymer melt or of a dispersion of nanofillers in a polymeric matrix during the process of extrusion. This sensor presents three openings: two for light sensor setups (one for transmission measurements and the other for 90°-scattered light measurements) and one for the incident laser beam. The experimental validation of this optical sensor has been realized on two materials: poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and on the nanocomposites obtained by the melt mixing of this polymer matrix with modified montmorillonite (MMT) clays. Experimental results proved the good results in terms of signal repeatability and sensitivity to organoclay particle concentration and structures of nanocomposites respectively.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Chen G, Shen D, Qi Z (2000) 2000. J Mater Res 15:35110.1557/JMR.2000.0055 ↗
2. Lan T, Pinnavaia TJ (1994) Chem Mater 6:221610.1021/cm00048a006 ↗
3. Kojima Y, Kawasumi M, Usuki A, Okada A, Fukushima Y, Kurachi T, Kamigaito O (1993) J Mater Res 8:118510.1557/JMR.1993.1185 ↗
4. Ginzburg VV, Singh C, Balazs AC (2000) Macromolecules 33:108910.1021/ma991324e ↗
5. Powell CE, Beal GW (2006) Physical properties of polymer/clay nanocomposites. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 10(2):73–8010.1016/j.cossms.2006.09.001 ↗
6. Pinnavaia TJ, Beall GW (eds) (2000) Polymer–clay nanocomposites. Wiley, New York
7. Giannelis EP, Krishnamoorti R, Manias E (1999) Adv Polym Sci 138:10710.1007/3-540-69711-X_3 ↗
8. Lee EC, Mielewski DF, Baird RJ (2004) Exfoliation and dispersion enhancement in polypropylene nanocomposites by in-situ melt phase ultrasonication. Polym Eng Sci 44(9):1773–178210.1002/pen.20179 ↗
9. Nguyen QT, Baird DG (2006) Preparation of polymer–clay nanocomposites and their properties. Adv Polym Tech 25(4):270–28510.1002/adv.20079 ↗
10. Utracki LA, Kamal MR (2002) Clay-containing polymeric nanocomposites. Arabian Journal for science and Engineering 27 (1c):43–68
11. Vaia RA, Ishii H, Giannelis EP (1993) Chem Mater 5:169410.1021/cm00036a004 ↗
12. Liu X, Wu Q (2001) PP/clay nanocomposites prepared by grafting-melt intercalation. Polymer 42(25):10013–1001910.1016/S0032-3861(01)00561-4 ↗
13. Lepoittevin B, Devalckenaere M, Pantoustier N, Alexandre M, Kubies D, Calberg C et al (2002) Poly(e-caprolactone)/clay nanocomposites prepared by melt intercalation: mechanical, thermal and rheological properties. Polymer 43(14):4017–402310.1016/S0032-3861(02)00229-X ↗
14. Fischer D et al (2008) Monitoring of the sol-gel synthesis of organic-inorganic hybrids by FTIR transmission, FTIR/ATR, NIR and Raman spectroscopy. Macromol Symp 265:134–14310.1002/masy.200850514 ↗
15. Fischer D et al (2006) Process monitoring of polymers by in-line ATR-IR, NIR and Raman spectroscopy and ultrasonic measurements. Compt Rendus Chim 9(11–12):1419–142410.1016/j.crci.2006.06.006 ↗
16. El-Mabrouk K et al (2008) Effect of shear on phase-separation in polystyrene/poly(vinyl methyl ether)/organoclay nanocomposites. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 8(4):1895–190010.1166/jnn.2008.0191895 ↗
17. Peng M et al (2007) Effect of an organoclay on the reaction-induced phase-separation kinetics and morphology of a poly(ether imide)/epoxy mixture. J Appl Polym Sci 104(2):1205–121410.1002/app.25759 ↗
18. Wang SH et al (2005) Morphology, mechanical and optical properties of transparent BR/clay nanocomposites. Polym Test 24(6):766–77410.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.03.008 ↗
19. Pogodina NV et al (2008) Processing and characterization of biodegradable polymer nanocomposites: detection of dispersion state. Rheologica Acta 47(5–6):543–55310.1007/s00397-007-0243-2 ↗
20. Bur AJ et al (2005) Measuring the extent of exfoliation in polymer/clay nanocomposites using real-time process monitoring methods. Polymer 46(24):10908–1091810.1016/j.polymer.2005.08.091 ↗
21. Bur AJ et al (2004) A dielectric slit die for in-line monitoring of polymer compounding. Rev Sci Instrum 75(4):1103–110910.1063/1.1667256 ↗
22. Matadi R, Makradi A, Ahzi S, Sieffert JG, Etienne S, Rush D, Vaudemond R, Muller R, Bouquey M (2009) Preparation, structural characterization, and thermomechanical properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)/organoclay nanocomposites by melt intercalation. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 9:2923–293010.1166/jnn.2009.0012923 ↗