AI-accelerated digital twinning for the online PDE-based control of ISBM processes with recycled PET
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Injection Molding Process and Properties · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies · Polymer crystallization and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Brandau O (2017) Stretch blow molding, Third edition, William Andrew, an imprint of Elsevier, Amsterdam Boston Heidelberg10.1016/B978-0-323-46177-1.00005-6 ↗
2. Schmidt FM, Agassant JF, Bellet M, Desoutter L (1996) Viscoelastic simulation of PET stretch/blow molding process. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 64:19–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0257(95)01420-910.1016/0377-0257(95)01420-9 ↗
3. Schmidt FM, Agassant JF, Bellet M (1998) Experimental study and numerical simulation of the injection stretch/blow molding process. Polym Eng Sci 38:1399–1412. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.1031010.1002/pen.10310 ↗
4. Menary GH, Tan CW, Armstrong CG, Salomeia Y, Picard M, Billon N, Harkin-Jones EMA (2010) Validating injection stretch-blow molding simulation through free blow trials. Polym Eng Sci 50:1047–1057. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2155510.1002/pen.21555 ↗
5. Bordival M, Schmidt FM, Maoult YL, Velay V (2009) Optimization of preform temperature distribution for the stretch-blow molding of PET bottles: infrared heating and blowing modeling. Polym Eng Sci 49:783–793. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2129610.1002/pen.21296 ↗
6. Cosson B, Chevalier L, Yvonnet J (2009) Optimization of the thickness of PET bottles during stretch blow molding by using a mesh-free (numerical) method. Int Polym Process 24:223–233. https://doi.org/10.3139/217.221510.3139/217.2215 ↗
7. Cosson B, Chevalier L, Régnier G (2012) Simulation of the stretch blow moulding process: from the modelling of the microstructure evolution to the end-use elastic properties of polyethylene terephthalate bottles. Int J Mater Form 5:39–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-1010-y10.1007/s12289-010-1010-y ↗
8. Nixon J, Menary GH, Yan S (2017) Finite element simulations of stretch-blow moulding with experimental validation over a broad process window. Int J Mater Form 10:793–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-016-1320-910.1007/s12289-016-1320-9 ↗
9. Luo Y, Chevalier L, Monteiro E, Yan S, Menary G (2020) Simulation of the injection stretch blow molding process: an anisotropic visco-hyperelastic model for polyethylene terephthalate behavior. Polym Eng Sci 60:823–831. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2534110.1002/pen.25341 ↗
10. Tan CW, Menary GH, Salomeia Y, Armstrong CG, Picard M, Billon N, Harkin-Jones EMA, Martin PJ, Maheshwari K (2008) Modelling of the injection stretch blow moulding of PET containers via a pressure-volume-time (PV-t) thermodynamic relationship. Int J Mater Form 1(S1):799–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-008-0296-510.1007/s12289-008-0296-5 ↗
11. Wang T, Xu F, Huo Y, Potier-Ferry M (2018) Snap-through instabilities of pressurized balloons: pear-shaped bifurcation and localized bulging. Int J Non-Linear Mech 98:137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2017.10.01710.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2017.10.017 ↗
12. Buckley C, Jones DC (1995) Glass-rubber constitutive model for amorphous polymers near the glass transition. Polymer 36:3301–3312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(95)99429-X10.1016/0032-3861(95)99429-X ↗
13. Adams AM, Buckley CP, Jones DP (2000) Biaxial hot drawing of poly(ethylene terephthalate): measurements and modelling of strain-stiffening. Polymer. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00834-910.1016/S0032-3861(98)00834-9 ↗
14. Gorlier E, Agassant JF, Haudin JM, Billon N (2001) Experimental and theoretical study of uniaxial deformation of amorphous poly(ethylene terephthalate) above glass transition temperature. Plast Rubber Compos 30:48–55. https://doi.org/10.1179/14658010110154143510.1179/146580101101541435 ↗
15. Luo Y-M, Chevalier L, Utheza F, Monteiro E (2013) Numerical simulation of the thermodependant viscohyperelastic behavior of polyethylene terephthalate near the glass transition temperature: prediction of the self-heating during biaxial tension test. Polym Eng Sci 53:2683–2695. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2352210.1002/pen.23522 ↗
16. Quandalle G (2017) Étude et modélisation mécanique de la cristallisation induite par la déformation des polymères: caoutchouc naturel réticulé et PET, Mines Paris - PSL
17. Teng F, Menary G, Malinov S, Yan S, Stevens JB (2022) Predicting the multiaxial stress-strain behavior of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) at different strain rates and temperatures above Tg by using an artificial neural network. Mech Mater 165:104175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.10417510.1016/j.mechmat.2021.104175 ↗
18. Biglione J, Béreaux Y, Charmeau J-Y, Balcaen J, Chhay S (2016) Numerical simulation and optimization of the injection blow molding of polypropylene bottles - a single stage process. Int J Mater Form 9:471–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-015-1234-y10.1007/s12289-015-1234-y ↗
19. Pinto RS, Silva HM, Duarte FM, Nunes JP, Gaspar-Cunha A (2021) Neuroevolutionary Multiobjective Optimization of Injection Stretch Blow Molding Process in the Blowing Phase. In: Gaspar-Cunha A, Periaux J, Giannakoglou KC, Gauger NR, Quagliarella D, Greiner D (eds) Adv. Evol. Deterministic Methods Des. Optim. Control Eng. Sci. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57422-2_2010.1007/978-3-030-57422-2_20 ↗
20. Luo Y, Tantchou Yakam G, Charlot R, Chevalier L, Savajano R (2023) In situ adjustment of a visco hyper elastic model for stretch blow molding process simulation of poly-ethylene terephthalate bottles. Polym Eng Sci 63(2023):3066–3082. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2642810.1002/pen.26428 ↗
21. L. Viora, M. Combeau, M. Pucci, D. Perrin, P.-J. Liotier, J.-L. Bouvard, C. Combeaud, A Comparative Study on Crystallisation for Virgin and Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET): Multiscale Effects on Physico-Mechanical Properties, Chemistry and Materials Science, 2023. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202307.0142.v110.20944/preprints202307.0142.v1 ↗
22. Brouwer MT, Alvarado Chacon F, van Thoden Velzen EU (2020) Effect of recycled content and rPET quality on the properties of PET bottles, part III: modelling of repetitive recycling. Packag Technol Sci 33:373–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.248910.1002/pts.2489 ↗
23. Le A-D, Gilblas R, Lucin V, Maoult YL, Schmidt F (2022) Infrared heating modeling of recycled PET preforms in injection stretch blow molding process. Int J Therm Sci 181:107762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2022.10776210.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2022.107762 ↗
24. Rohart V, Combeaud C (2022) Stretchability above glass transition of mechanically recycled poly(ethylene terephtalate), PET. Polymer 257:125218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2022.12521810.1016/j.polymer.2022.125218 ↗
25. Sylvestre N, Bouvard J-L, Derrien M, Monnier X, Combeaud C (2024) Effects of mechanical recycling on PET stretchability. Polymer 307:127256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2024.12725610.1016/j.polymer.2024.127256 ↗
26. Nait-Ali LK, Colin X, Bergeret A (2011) Kinetic analysis and modelling of PET macromolecular changes during its mechanical recycling by extrusion. Polym Degrad Stab 96:236–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.11.00410.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.11.004 ↗
27. Lecomte HA, Liggat JJ (2006) Degradation mechanism of diethylene glycol units in a terephthalate polymer. Polym Degrad Stab 91:681–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.05.02810.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.05.028 ↗
28. Es-haghi MS, Anitescu C, Rabczuk T (2024) Methods for enabling real-time analysis in digital twins: a literature review. Comput Struct 297:107342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2024.10734210.1016/j.compstruc.2024.107342 ↗
29. Chinesta F, Cueto E, Abisset-Chavanne E, Duval JL, Khaldi FE (2020) Virtual, digital and hybrid twins: a new paradigm in data-based engineering and engineered data. Arch Comput Methods Eng 27:105–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-018-9301-410.1007/s11831-018-9301-4 ↗
30. Champaney V, Chinesta F, Cueto E (2022) Engineering empowered by physics-based and data-driven hybrid models: a methodological overview. Int J Mater Form 15:31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-022-01678-410.1007/s12289-022-01678-4 ↗
31. Sancarlos A, Cameron M, Le Peuvedic J-M, Groulier J, Duval J-L, Cueto E, Chinesta F (2021) Learning stable reduced-order models for hybrid twins. Data-Centric Eng 2:e10. https://doi.org/10.1017/dce.2021.1610.1017/dce.2021.16 ↗
32. Rodriguez S, Monteiro E, Mechbal N, Rebillat M, Chinesta F (2023) Hybrid twin of RTM process at the scarce data limit. Int J Mater Form 16:40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-023-01747-210.1007/s12289-023-01747-2 ↗
33. Arruda EM, Boyce MC (1993) A three-dimensional constitutive model for the large stretch behavior of rubber elastic materials. J Mech Phys Solids 41(2):389–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(93)90013-610.1016/0022-5096(93)90013-6 ↗
34. Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI (2006) Gaussian processes for machine learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass
35. Salomeia Y, Menary GH, Armstrong CG, Nixon J, Yan S (2015) Measuring and modelling air mass flow rate in the injection stretch blow moulding process. Int J Mater Form 9:531–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-015-1240-010.1007/s12289-015-1240-0 ↗
36. Sobol IM (1967) On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals. USSR Comput Math Math Phys 7:86–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-5553(67)90144-910.1016/0041-5553(67)90144-9 ↗
37. Chevalier L, Luo YM, Monteiro E, Menary GH (2012) On visco-elastic modelling of polyethylene terephthalate behaviour during multiaxial elongations slightly over the glass transition temperature. Mech Mater 52:103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2012.05.00310.1016/j.mechmat.2012.05.003 ↗
38. Abdi H, Williams LJ (2010) Principal component analysis. WIREs Comput Stat 2:433–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.10110.1002/wics.101 ↗
39. Kerfriden P, Goury O, Rabczuk T, Bordas SPA (2013) A partitioned model order reduction approach to rationalise computational expenses in nonlinear fracture mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 256:169–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2012.12.00410.1016/j.cma.2012.12.004 ↗
40. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, Vanderplas J, Passos A, Cournapeau D (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830
41. Storn R, Price K (1997) Differential Evolution - A simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Glob Optim 11:341–359. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100820282132810.1023/A:1008202821328 ↗
42. Maday Y, Patera AT, Penn JD, Yano M (2015) A parameterized-background data-weak approach to variational data assimilation: formulation, analysis, and application to acoustics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 102:933–965. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.474710.1002/nme.4747 ↗
43. Girolami M, Febrianto E, Yin G, Cirak F (2021) The statistical finite element method (statFEM) for coherent synthesis of observation data and model predictions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 375:113533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.11353310.1016/j.cma.2020.113533 ↗