Effect of internal pressure on springback during low pressure tube hydroforming
Source abstract
Abstract
For the existence of bending deformation during low pressure tube hydroforming(LPTH), springback is unavoidable and deteriorate the forming accuracy. In this paper, an analytical model of springback for LPTH was proposed. The simulation and experiment were carried out to investigate the effects of the main factors on the springback, such as internal pressure, corner radius and thickness. The results indicate that, different from expansion deformation, bending forming is the main and basic deformation for tube forced into the required shape during the LPTH. Consequently, springback appears. However, the deformation type has great dependence on the internal pressure, which ensures the internal pressure of the function to reduce the springback. There is a critical pressure which would induce pure bending deformation and result in the largest springback. Consequently, it need try to avoid the critical pressure for the LPTH. On the contrary, whatever the internal pressure is less or bigger than the critical pressure, springback are all decreased. In contrast, it is more effective to decrease the springback when pressure is bigger than the critical pressure. In addition, bigger corner radius can also contribute to decrease the springback because of a much larger tensile force introduced under the same internal pressure. For a definite component, improving internal pressure is the only method to decrease the springback.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Lang LH, Wang ZR, Kang DC, Yuan SJ, Zhang SH, Danckert J, Nielsen KB (2004) Hydroforming highlights: sheet hydroforming and tube hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 151(1–3):165–17710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.032 ↗
2. Dohman F, Hartl C (1996) Hydroforming – A method to manufacture light-weight parts. J Mater Process Technol 60:669–67610.1016/0924-0136(96)02403-X ↗
3. Tang ZJ, He ZB, Liu G, Yuan SJ, Hu L (2009) Hydroforming of AZ61A tubular component with various cross-section. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 19(s):398–40210.1016/S1003-6326(10)60077-5 ↗
4. Morphy G (1998) Pressure-Sequence and High-Pressure Hydro-Forming. Tube and Pipe Journal 2(1):128–135
5. Nikhare C, Weiss M, Hodgson PD (2008) Numerical investigation of high and low pressure tube hydroforming. Numisheet Conference Proceedings, Switzerland, pp 691–696
6. Nikhare C, Weiss M, Hodgson PD (2008) Experimental and numerical investigation of low pressure tube hydroforming on stainless steel. Metal Forming Conference Proceedings, Poland, pp 272–279
7. Hwang YM, Altan T (2003) Finite element analyses of tube hydroforming processes in a rectangular die. Finite Elem Anal Des 39(11):1071–108210.1016/S0168-874X(02)00157-9 ↗
8. Hwang YM, Altan T (2002) FE simulation of crushing of circular tubes into triangular cross-setions. J Mater Process Technol 125-126:833–83810.1016/S0924-0136(02)00385-0 ↗
9. Li SH, Xu XH, Zhang WG, Lin ZQ (2009) Study on the crushing and hydroforming processes of tubes in a trapezoid-sectional die. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43:67–7710.1007/s00170-008-1702-3 ↗
10. Nikhare C, Weiss M, Hodgson PD (2009) FEA Comparison of High and Low Pressure Tube Hydroforming of TRIP Steel. Comput Mater Sci 47(1):146–15210.1016/j.commatsci.2009.06.024 ↗
11. Lei P, Yang LF, Zhang YX (2011) Investigation on the Formability of Tube in Hydroforming with Radical Crushing under Simple Loading Paths. Adv Mater Res 291-294:595–60010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.291-294.595 ↗
12. Yang LF, Rong HS, He YL (2014) Deformation Behavior of a Thin-Walled Tube in Hydroforming with Radial Crushing Under Pulsating Hydraulic Pressure. J Mater Eng Perform 23(2):429–43810.1007/s11665-013-0783-9 ↗
13. Xie WC, Han C, Chu GN, Yuan SJ (2015) Research on hydro-pressing process of closed section tubular parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80:1149–115710.1007/s00170-015-7126-y ↗
14. Nikhare C, Weiss M, Hodgson PD (2010) Die closing force during low pressure tubehydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 210:2238–224410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.08.011 ↗
15. Nikhare C, Weiss M, Hodgson PD (2017) Buckling in low pressure tube hydroforming. J Manuf Process 28:1–1010.1016/j.jmapro.2017.05.015 ↗
16. Yang C, Ngaile G (2008) Analytical model for planar tube hydroforming: prediction of formed shape, corner fill, wall thinning and forming pressure. Int J Mech Sci 50:1263–127910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2008.05.006 ↗
17. Hwang YM, Altan T (2002) FE simulation of the crushing of circular tubes in triangular cross-sections. J Mater Process Technol 125–126:833–83810.1016/S0924-0136(02)00385-0 ↗
18. Hwang YM, Altan T (2003) Finite element analyses of tube hydroforming processes in a rectangular die. Finite Elem Anal Des 39(11):1071–108210.1016/S0168-874X(02)00157-9 ↗
19. Nikhare C, Weiss M, Hodgson PD (2009) FEA comparison of high and low pressure tube hydroforming of TRIP steel. Comput Mater Sci 47:146–15210.1016/j.commatsci.2009.06.024 ↗
20. Liu G, Yuan SJ, Teng BG (2006) Analysis of thinning at the transition corner in tube hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 177(1–3):688–69110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.066 ↗