journal article·2016-07Open access

Effect of hardening models on different ductile fracture criteria in sheet metal forming

Shahram Abbasnejad Dizaji, Haluk Darendeliler, Bilgin Kaftanoğlu

Abstract

Prediction of the fracture is one of the challenging issues which gains attention in sheet metal forming as numerical analyses are being extensively used to simulate the process. To have better results in predicting the sheet metal fracture, appropriate ductile fracture criterion (DFC), yield criterion and hardening rule should be chosen. In this study, the effects of different hardening models namely isotropic, kinematic and combined hardening rules on the various uncoupled ductile fracture criteria are investigated using experimental and numerical methods. Five different ductile fracture criteria are implemented to a finite element code by the user subroutines. The criterion constants of DFCs are obtained by the related experimental tests. The in-plane principle strains obtained by the finite element analyses for different DFCs are compared with the experimental results. Also, the experimental results are used to evaluate the principle strain values calculated by the finite element analysis for different combinations of DFCs and hardening rules. It is shown that some DFCs give better predictions if the appropriate hardening model is employed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. Keeler SP (1963) Plastic instability and fracture in sheet stretched over rigid punches. ASM Trans Q 56:25–48
2. Yoshida K, Kuwabara T, Kuroda M (2007) Path-dependence of the forming limit stresses in a sheet metal. Int J Plas 23:361–384. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.05.00510.1016/j.ijplas.2006.05.005 ↗
3. Hongsheng L, Yuying Y, Zhongqi Y, Zhenzhong S, Yongzhi W (2009) The application of a ductile fracture criterion to the prediction of the forming limit of sheet metals. J Mat Proc Tech 209:5443–5447. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.04.02010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.04.020 ↗
4. Freudenthal FA (1950) The inelastic behavior of engineering materials and structures. Wiley, New York
5. Cockroft MG, Latham DJ (1968) Ductility and workability of metals. J Inst Metall 96:33–39
6. Brozzo P, Deluca B, Rendina R (1972) A new method for the prediction of formability limits of metal sheets. In: Sheet Metal Forming and Formability, Proceedings of the Seventh Biennial Congress of International Deep Drawing Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands
7. Oh SI, Chen CC, Kobayashi S (1979) Ductile fracture in axisymmetric extrusion and drawing. J Eng Ind Trans ASME 101:36–44. doi: 10.1115/1.343947110.1115/1.3439471 ↗
8. Ayada M, Higashino T, Mori K (1984) Central bursting in extrusion of inhomogeneous materials. In Proceedings of the First ICTP. Adv. Tech. of Pals. Tokyo, Japan. 1:553–558
9. Kim N, Oh C, Kim Y, Yoon B, Ma Y (2011) Comparison of fracture strain based ductile failure simulation with experimental results. Int J Press Vessel Piping 88:434–447. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.07.00610.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.07.006 ↗
10. Hodge PJ (1977) Automatic piecewise linearization in ideal plasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 10:249–272. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(77)90072-X10.1016/0045-7825(77)90072-X ↗
11. Hollomon JH (1945) Tensile deformation. Tram AIME 162:268–290
12. Prager W (1956) A new method of analyzing stress and strains work-hardening plastic solids. J Appl Mech 23:493–49610.1115/1.4011389 ↗
13. Lemaitre J, Chaboche L (1990) mechanic of solid materials, Cambridge university press, U.K., Ch.6.10.1017/CBO9781139167970 ↗
14. Hibbit K, Sorensen Inc (2002) ABAQUS/Explicit User’s Manual, Version 6.3
15. Nakazima K, Kikuma T, Hasuka K (1968) Study on the formability of steel sheets. Yamata Techn Rep 264:141–154