Hybrid twin of RTM process at the scarce data limit
Source abstract
Abstract
To ensure correct filling in the resin transfer molding (RTM) process, adequate numerical models have to be developed in order to correctly capture its physics, so that this model can be considered for process optimization. However, the complexity of the phenomenon often makes it impossible for numerical models to accurately predict its behavior, limiting its usage. To overcome this limitation, numerical models are enriched with measured data to ensure their correct predictability. Nevertheless, the data used is often limited due to practical constraints, such as a limited number of sensors or the high costs of experimental campaigns. In this context, the present paper demonstrates the implementation of a numerical model enriched with data, called Hybrid Twin applied to the RTM process when few sensors are considered in the mold to be injected. The performances of the developed hybrid twin are tested in a virtual test for the injection of a 2D mold, where the hybrid twin constructed using a simplified numerical model allows to accurately predict a complex model's resin flow-front over its entire time history.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Composite Material Mechanics · Injection Molding Process and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Fong L, Advani S (1998) Resin transfer molding. Handbook of composites. Springer, Boston, pp 433–45510.1007/978-1-4615-6389-1_21 ↗
2. Potter KD (1999) The early history of the resin transfer moulding process for aerospace applications. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 30(5):619–62110.1016/S1359-835X(98)00179-1 ↗
3. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL (2005) The Finite Element Method for Solid and Structural Mechanics. Elsevier, Amsterdam
4. Smith GD, Smith GD, Smith GDS (1985) Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations: Finite Difference Methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford
5. Chinesta F, Cueto E, Abisset-Chavanne E, Duval JL, Khaldi FE (2020) Virtual, digital and hybrid twins: A new paradigm in data-based engineering and engineered data. Archives Comput Methods Eng 27(1):105–13410.1007/s11831-018-9301-4 ↗
6. Russell SJ (2010) Artificial Intelligence a Modern Approach. Pearson Education Inc, New York
7. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep Learn. MIT press, MA, USA
8. Wani MA, Bhat FA, Afzal S, Khan AI (2020) Advances in Deep Learning. Springer, Singapore10.1007/978-981-13-6794-6 ↗
9. Gulli A, Pal S (2017) Deep Learning with Keras. Packt Publishing Ltd, Birmingham, UK
10. Moya B, González D, Alfaro I, Chinesta F, Cueto E (2019) Learning slosh dynamics by means of data. Comput Mech 64(2):511–52310.1007/s00466-019-01705-3 ↗
11. Reille A, Hascoet N, Ghnatios C, Ammar A, Cueto E, Duval JL, Chinesta F, Keunings R (2019) Incremental dynamic mode decomposition: A reduced-model learner operating at the low-data limit. Comptes Rendus Mécanique 347(11):780–79210.1016/j.crme.2019.11.003 ↗
12. Hernández Q, Badías A, González D, Chinesta F, Cueto E (2021) Structure-preserving neural networks. J Comput Phys 426:10995010.1016/j.jcp.2020.109950 ↗
13. Sancarlos A, Cameron M, Le Peuvedic J-M, Groulier J, Duval J-L, Cueto E, Chinesta F (2021) Learning stable reduced-order models for hybrid twins. Data-Centric Engineering 210.1017/dce.2021.16 ↗
14. Sancarlos A, Cameron M, Abel A, Cueto E, Duval J-L, Chinesta F (2021) From rom of electrochemistry to ai-based battery digital and hybrid twin. Archives Comput Methods Eng 28(3):979–101510.1007/s11831-020-09404-6 ↗
15. Champaney V, Chinesta F, Cueto E (2022) Engineering empowered by physics-based and data-driven hybrid models: A methodological overview. Int J Mater Form 15(3):1–1410.1007/s12289-022-01678-4 ↗
16. Ladevèze P (1985) Sur une famille d’algorithmes en mécanique des structures. Comptes-rendus des séances de l’Académie des sciences. Série 2, Mécanique-physique, Chimie, Sciences de l’univers, Sciences de la Terre 300(2):41–44
17. Boucard P-A, Ladevèze P (1999) A multiple solution method for non-linear structural mechanics. Mech Eng 50:317–328
18. Ladevèze P, Passieux J-C, Néron D (2010) The latin multiscale computational method and the proper generalized decomposition. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(21–22):1287–129610.1016/j.cma.2009.06.023 ↗
19. Relun N, Néron D, Boucard P-A (2011) Multiscale elastic-viscoplastic computational analysis: a detailed example. European Journal of Computational Mechanics/Revue Européenne de Mécanique Numérique 20(7–8):379–409
20. Relun N, Néron D, Boucard P-A (2013) A model reduction technique based on the pgd for elastic-viscoplastic computational analysis. Comput Mech 51(1):83–9210.1007/s00466-012-0706-x ↗
21. Néron D, Boucard P-A, Relun N (2015) Time-space pgd for the rapid solution of 3d nonlinear parametrized problems in the many-query context. Int J Numer Methods Eng 103(4):275–29210.1002/nme.4893 ↗
22. Rodriguez S, Néron D, Charbonnel P-E, Ladevèze P, Nahas G (2019) Non incremental latin-pgd solver for non-linear vibratoric dynamics problems. In: 14ème Colloque National en Calcul des Structures, CSMA 2019
23. Iturra SR (2021) Abaques virtuelle pour le génie parasismique incluant des parametres associes au chargement. PhD thesis, Université Paris-Saclay
24. Ammar A, Mokdad B, Chinesta F, Keunings R (2006) A new family of solvers for some classes of multidimensional partial differential equations encountered in kinetic theory modeling of complex fluids. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 139(3):153–17610.1016/j.jnnfm.2006.07.007 ↗
25. Chinesta F, Ammar A, Cueto E (2010) Recent advances and new challenges in the use of the proper generalized decomposition for solving multidimensional models. Archives Comput Methods Eng 17(4):327–35010.1007/s11831-010-9049-y ↗
26. Chinesta F, Cueto E (2014) PGD-based Model Mater. Structures and Processes, Springer, Switzerland
27. Torregrosa S, Champaney V, Ammar A, Herbert V, Chinesta F (2022) Surrogate parametric metamodel based on optimal transport. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 194:36–6310.1016/j.matcom.2021.11.010 ↗
28. Ammar A, Chinesta F, Cueto E, Doblaré M (2012) Proper generalized decomposition of time-multiscale models. Int J Numer Methods Eng 90(5):569–59610.1002/nme.3331 ↗
29. Ibáñez R, Ammar A, Cueto E, Huerta A, Duval J-L, Chinesta F (2019) Multiscale proper generalized decomposition based on the partition of unity. Int J Numer Methods Eng 120(6):727–74710.1002/nme.6154 ↗
30. Pasquale A, Ammar A, Falcó A, Perotto S, Cueto E, Duval J-L, Chinesta F (2021) A separated representation involving multiple time scales within the proper generalized decomposition framework. Adv Model Simul Eng Sci 8(1):1–2210.1186/s40323-021-00211-7 ↗
31. Passieux J-C, Ladevèze P, Néron D (2010) A scalable time-space multiscale domain decomposition method: adaptive time scale separation. Comput Mech 46(4):621–63310.1007/s00466-010-0504-2 ↗
32. Lee JA, Verleysen M (2007) Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction. Springer, New York10.1007/978-0-387-39351-3 ↗
33. Ibáñez R, Abisset-Chavanne E, Ammar A, González D, Cueto E, Huerta A, Duval JL, Chinesta F (2018) A multidimensional data-driven sparse identification technique: the sparse proper generalized decomposition. Complexity 201810.1155/2018/5608286 ↗
34. Sancarlos A, Champaney V, Duval J-L, Cueto E, Chinesta F (2021) Pgd-based advanced nonlinear multiparametric regressions for constructing metamodels at the scarce-data limit. arXiv:2103.05358
35. Sancarlos A, Cueto E, Chinesta F, Duval J-L (2021) A novel sparse reduced order formulation for modeling electromagnetic forces in electric motors. SN Appl Sci 3(3):1–1910.1007/s42452-021-04310-3 ↗
36. Quaranta G, Abisset-Chavanne E, Chinesta F, Duval J-L (2018) A cyber physical system approach for composite part: From smart manufacturing to predictive maintenance. In: AIP conference proceedings, vol 1960, AIP Publishing LLC, pp 02002510.1063/1.5034826 ↗
37. Sánchez F, García J, Chinesta F, Gascón L, Zhang C, Liang Z, Wang B (2006) A process performance index based on gate-distance and incubation time for the optimization of gate locations in liquid composite molding processes. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 37(6):903–91210.1016/j.compositesa.2005.01.016 ↗
38. Garcıa J, Gascón L, Chinesta F (2003) A fixed mesh numerical method for modelling the flow in liquid composites moulding processes using a volume of fluid technique. Comput methods Appl Mech Eng 192(7–8):877–89310.1016/S0045-7825(02)00604-7 ↗
39. Sanchez F, Garcia JA, Gascón L, Chinesta F (2007) Towards an efficient numerical treatment of the transport problems in the resin transfer molding simulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(21–24):2300–231210.1016/j.cma.2006.07.018 ↗
40. Quaranta G (2019) Efficient simulation tools for real-time monitoring and control using model order reduction and data-driven techniques. Universitat politécnica de Catalunya, Thesis, École centrale de Nantes
41. Ghnatios C, Masson F, Huerta A, Leygue A, Cueto E, Chinesta F (2012) Proper generalized decomposition based dynamic data-driven control of thermal processes. Comput Methods Appl Mechan Eng 213:29–4110.1016/j.cma.2011.11.018 ↗
42. Dennis JE Jr, Schnabel RB (1996) Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations. SIAM, Philadelphia, Penn10.1137/1.9781611971200 ↗
43. Gavin HP (2019) The levenberg-marquardt algorithm for nonlinear least squares curve-fitting problems. Duke University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, p 19
44. Karhunen K (1946) Zur spektraltheorie stochastischer prozesse. Ann. Acad. Sci, Fennicae, AI, p 34
45. Loeve M (1948) Fonctions aléatoires du second ordre. Lévy, Processus Stochastiques et Mouvement Brownien, Gauthier-Villars, Paris
46. Everson R, Sirovich L (1995) Karhunen-loeve procedure for gappy data. JOSA A 12(8):1657–166410.1364/JOSAA.12.001657 ↗
47. Fasshauer GE (2007) Meshfree Approximation Methods with MATLAB, vol 6. World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ10.1142/6437 ↗