Surface tracking of diffusion bonding void closure and its application to titanium alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Diffusion bonding is a process by which two flat, usually metallic, surfaces are welded together at a high temperature and moderate pressure. Bonding occurs due to a combination of diffusion and power law creep that close the voids formed by microscopic differences between the mating surfaces. While the different process parameters are well understood the effects of surface condition and void shapes during bonding has not been thoroughly researched. In this paper we use measured surface profiles, discretize them, and apply the diffusion and creep equations numerically to the profiles in order to provide insight into the effects of surface geometry on bonding. Using this method the voids can interact with each other and the effects of nearby voids can be computed. Experimental tests are performed to confirm the model and theoretical tests were created to determine what the effects of different surface geometries are on bonding performance. While in most cases the bonding was dominated by power law creep the most optimal void shape was one where the voids had completed the creep stage and were controlled by diffusive processes. It was also found that concentrating the overlap area also increases bonding performance.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Sanders DG, Ramulu M (2004) Examination of superplastic forming combined with diffusion bonding for titanium: perspective from experience. J Mater Eng Perform 13(6):744–752. https://doi.org/10.1361/1059949042157410.1361/10599490421574 ↗
2. Hamilton CH (1973) Pressure requirements for diffusion bonding titanium. Titanium Science and Technology:625–64810.1007/978-1-4757-1346-6_46 ↗
3. Garmong G, Paton NE, Argon AS (1975) Attainment of full interfacial contact during diffusion bonding. Metall Trans A 6(6):1269–127910.1007/BF02658537 ↗
4. Derby B, Wallach ER (1984) Diffusion bonding: development of theoretical model. Metal Science 18(9):427–43110.1179/030634584790419809 ↗
5. Derby B, Wallach ER (1984) Diffusion bonds in copper. J Mater Sci 19(10):3140–314810.1007/BF00549797 ↗
6. Derby B, Wallach ER (1982) Theoretical model for diffusion bonding. Metal Science 16(1):49–5610.1179/030634582790427028 ↗
7. Hill A, Wallach E (1989) Modelling solid-state diffusion bonding. Acta Metall 37(9):2425–243710.1016/0001-6160(89)90040-0 ↗
8. Pilling J, Livesey DW, Hawkyard JB, Ridley N (1984) Solid state bonding in superplastic Ti-6Al-4V. Metal Science 18(3):117–12210.1179/msc.1984.18.3.117 ↗
9. Pilling J (1988) The kinetics of isostatic diffusion bonding in superplastic materials. Mater Sci Eng 100:137–14410.1016/0025-5416(88)90249-2 ↗
10. Salehi MT, Pilling J, Ridley N, Hamilton DL (1992) Isostatic diffusion bonding of superplastic Ti-6Al-4V. Mater Sci Eng A 150(1):1–610.1016/0921-5093(90)90002-K ↗
11. Orhan N, Aksoy M, Eroglu M (1999) A new model for diffusion bonding and its application to duplex alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 271(1-2):458–46810.1016/S0921-5093(99)00315-9 ↗
12. Ma R, Li M, Li H, Yu W (2012) Modeling of void closure in diffusion bonding process based on dynamic conditions. Sci China Technol Sci 55(9):2420–2431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-012-4927-110.1007/s11431-012-4927-1 ↗
13. Li H, Li MQ, Kang PJ (2016) Void shrinking process and mechanisms of the diffusion bonded Ti–6Al–4V alloy with different surface roughness. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 122(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-015-9546-910.1007/s00339-015-9546-9 ↗
14. Guo ZX, Ridley N (1987) Modelling of diffusion bonding of metals. Mater Sci Technol 3(11):945–95310.1179/mst.1987.3.11.945 ↗
15. Takahashi Y, Inoue K (1992) Recent void shrinkage models and their applicability to diffusion bonding. Mater Sci Technol 8(11):953–96410.1179/mst.1992.8.11.953 ↗
16. Li S-X, Tu S-T, Xuan F-Z (2005) A probabilistic model for prediction of bonding time in diffusion bonding. Mater Sci Eng A 407(1-2):250–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.07.00310.1016/j.msea.2005.07.003 ↗
17. Kulkarni N, Ramulu M, Sanders DG (2016) Modeling of diffusion bonding time in dissimilar titanium alloys: preliminary results. J Manuf Sci Eng 138(12):12101010.1115/1.4034133 ↗
18. Islam MF, Pilling J, Ridley N (1997) Effect of surface finish and sheet thickness on isostatic diffusion bonding of superplastic Ti-6Al-4V. Mater Sci Technol 13(12):1045–1050. https://doi.org/10.1179/mst.1997.13.12.104510.1179/mst.1997.13.12.1045 ↗
19. Wang A, Ohashi O, Ueno K (2006) Effect of surface asperity on diffusion bonding. Mater Trans 47(1):179–184. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.47.17910.2320/matertrans.47.179 ↗
20. Shao X, Guo X, Han Y et al (1980-2015) (2015) characterization of the diffusion bonding behavior of pure Ti and Ni with different surface roughness during hot pressing. Mater Des 65:1001–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.07110.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.071 ↗
21. Guo Y, Wang Y, Gao B et al (2016) Rapid diffusion bonding of WC-co cemented carbide to 40Cr steel with Ni interlayer: effect of surface roughness and interlayer thickness. Ceram Int 42(15):16729–16737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.07.14510.1016/j.ceramint.2016.07.145 ↗
22. Zhang C, Li H, Li M (2017) Role of surface finish on interface grain boundary migration in vacuum diffusion bonding. Vacuum 137:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2016.12.02110.1016/j.vacuum.2016.12.021 ↗
23. Zuruzi AS, Li H, Dong G (1999) Effects of surface roughness on the diffusion bonding of Al alloy 6061 in air. Mater Sci Eng A 270(2):244–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00188-410.1016/S0921-5093(99)00188-4 ↗
24. Somekawa H, Higashi K (2003) The optimal surface roughness condition on diffusion bonding. Mater Trans 44(8):1640–1643. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.44.164010.2320/matertrans.44.1640 ↗
25. Huang P, Li Z, Sun J (2002) Shrinkage and splitting of microcracks under pressure simulated by the finite-element method. Metall Mater Trans A 33(4):1117–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-002-0213-310.1007/s11661-002-0213-3 ↗
26. Huang PZ, Sun J, Li ZH, Gao H (2003) Morphological healing evolution of intragranular penny-shaped microcracks by surface diffusion: part I. Simulation. Metall Mater Trans A 34(2):277–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-003-0329-010.1007/s11661-003-0329-0 ↗
27. Huang P, Sun J (2004) A numerical analysis of intergranular penny-shaped microcrack shrinkage controlled by coupled surface and interface diffusion. Metall Mater Trans A 35(4):1301–1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-004-0304-410.1007/s11661-004-0304-4 ↗
28. Pharr GM, Nix WD (1979) A numerical study of cavity growth controlled by surface diffusion. Acta Metall 27(10):1615–1631. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(79)90044-010.1016/0001-6160(79)90044-0 ↗
29. Chuang T-J, Kagawa KI, Rice JR, Sills LB (1979) Overview no. 2: non-equilibrium models for diffusive cavitation of grain interfaces. Acta Metall 27(3):265–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(79)90021-X10.1016/0001-6160(79)90021-X ↗
30. Needleman A, Rice JR (1980) Plastic creep flow effects in the diffusive cavitation of grain boundaries. Acta Metall 28(10):1315–1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(80)90001-210.1016/0001-6160(80)90001-2 ↗
31. Martinez L, Nix WD (1982) A numerical study of cavity growth controlled by coupled surface and grain boundary diffusion. Metall Trans A 13(3):427–43710.1007/BF02643351 ↗
32. Wang H, Li Z (2004) The three-dimensional analysis for diffusive shrinkage of a grain-boundary void in stressed solid. J Mater Sci 39(10):3425–3432. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000026945.89767.2510.1023/B:JMSC.0000026945.89767.25 ↗
33. Takahashi Y, Takahashi K, Nishiguchi K (1991) A numerical analysis of void shrinkage processes controlled by coupled surface and interface diffusion. Acta Metall Mater 39(12):3199–321610.1016/0956-7151(91)90055-6 ↗
34. Takahashi Y, Ueno F, Nishiguchi K (1988) A numerical analysis of the void-shrinkage process controlled by surface-diffusion. Acta Metall 36(11):3007–301810.1016/0001-6160(88)90183-6 ↗