journal article·2024-09-18Open access

Advancing Phantom Fabrication: Exploring 3D-Printed Solutions for Abdominal Imaging Research

Muris Becircic, Samir Delibegovic, Adnan Sehic, Fuad Julardzija, Adnan Beganovic, Kenana Ljuca, Adi Pandzic, Merim Jusufbegovic

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 18

Abstract

Background: The development of novel medical imaging technologies and treatment procedures hinges on the availability of accurate and versatile phantoms. This paper presents a cost-effective approach for creating anthropomorphic abdominal phantoms. Methods: This study proposes a cost-effective method using 3D printing and readily available materials (beeswax, plaster, and epoxy resin) to create high-fidelity anthropomorphic abdominal phantoms. The three-dimensionally printed phantoms exhibited X-ray attenuation properties closely matching those of human tissues, with measured Hounsfield unit (HU) values of −115.41 ± 20.29 HU for fat, 65.61 ± 18.06 HU for muscle, and 510 ± 131.2 HU for bone. These values were compared against patient images and a commercially available phantom, and no statistically significant difference was observed in fat tissue simulation (p = 0.428). Differences were observed for muscle and bone tissues, in which the 3D-printed phantom demonstrated higher HU values compared with patient images (p < 0.001). The 3D-printed phantom’s bone simulation was statistically like that of the commercially available phantom (p = 0.063). Conclusion: This method offers a cost-effective, accessible, and customizable alternative for abdominal phantoms. This innovation has the potential to accelerate advancements in abdominal imaging research, leading to improved diagnostic tools and treatment options for patients. These phantoms could be used to develop and test new imaging techniques with high accuracy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Anatomy and Medical Technology · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Radiation Dose and Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Clinical Center of the University of Sarajevo, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

University Clinical Center Tuzla, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Faculty of Health Studies, University Sarajevo, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

University Medical Centre Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University Sarajevo, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Design of a 3D printed coronary artery model for CT optimization10.1016/j.radi.2021.09.001 ↗
2. Tino, R., Yeo, A., Leary, M., Brandt, M., and Kron, T. (2019). A systematic review on 3D-printed imaging and dosimetry phantoms in radiation therapy. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat., 18.10.1177/1533033819870208 ↗
3. Using 3D printing techniques to create an anthropomorphic thorax phantom for medical imaging purposes10.1002/mp.12644 ↗
4. Construction and verification of a physical chest phantom from suitable tissue equivalent materials for computed tomography examinations10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.04.020 ↗
5. Tejo-Otero, A., Fenollosa-Artés, F., Achaerandio, I., Rey-Vinolas, S., Buj-Corral, I., Mateos-Timoneda, M.Á., and Engel, E. (2022). Soft-tissue-mimicking using hydrogels for the development of phantoms. Gels, 8.10.3390/gels8010040 ↗
6. The thermal properties of beeswaxes: Unexpected findings10.1242/jeb.007583 ↗
7. A review of 3D printing technology for medical applications10.1016/j.eng.2018.07.021 ↗
8. Fused deposition modeling: Process, materials, parameters, properties, and applications10.1007/s00170-022-08860-7 ↗
9. Fused deposition modelling: A review10.1108/RPJ-04-2019-0106 ↗
10. Gear, J.I., Cummings, C., Craig, A.J., Divoli, A., Long, C.D., Tapner, M., and Flux, G.D. (2016). Abdo-Man: A 3D-printed anthropomorphic phantom for validating quantitative SIRT. EJNMMI Phys., 3.10.1186/s40658-016-0151-6 ↗
11. Qiu, J., Hou, K., Dyer, B.A., Chen, J.C., Shi, L., Sun, Y., Xu, L., Zhao, H., Li, Z., and Chen, T. (2021). Constructing customized multimodal phantoms through 3D printing: A preliminary evaluation. Front. Phys., 9.10.3389/fphy.2021.605630 ↗
12. Recent advances on the development of phantoms using 3D printing for imaging with CT, MRI, PET, SPECT, and ultrasound10.1002/mp.13058 ↗
13. A review on the 3D printing of functional structures for medical phantoms and regenerated tissue and organ applications10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.013 ↗
14. Utility of 3D printed abdominal aortic aneurysm phantoms: A systematic review10.1111/ans.16763 ↗
15. 3D printing surgical phantoms and their role in the visualization of medical procedures10.1016/j.stlm.2022.100057 ↗
16. Anwari, V., Lai, A., Ursani, A., Rego, K., Karasfi, B., Sajja, S., and Paul, N. (2020). 3D printed CT-based abdominal structure mannequin for enabling research. 3D Print. Med., 6.10.1186/s41205-020-0056-9 ↗
17. Automatic CT-based finite element model generation for temperature-based death time estimation: Feasibility study and sensitivity analysis10.1007/s00414-016-1523-0 ↗
18. 3D printing based on imaging data: Review of medical applications10.1007/s11548-010-0476-x ↗
19. Okkalidis, N. (2022). 3D printing methods for radiological anthropomorphic phantoms. Phys. Med. Biol., 67.10.1088/1361-6560/ac80e7 ↗
20. Kairn, T., Crowe, S.B., and Markwell, T. (2015, January 7–12). Use of 3D printed materials as tissue-equivalent phantoms. Proceedings of the World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1007/978-3-319-19387-8_179 ↗
21. CT Hounsfield numbers of soft tissues on unenhanced abdominal CT scans: Variability between two different manufacturers’ MDCT scanners10.2214/AJR.12.10037 ↗
22. Tissue mimicking materials for a multi-imaging modality prostate phantom10.1118/1.1354998 ↗
23. Creation of an anthropomorphic CT head phantom for verification of image segmentation10.1002/mp.14127 ↗
24. Kim, S.Y., Park, J.W., Park, J., Yea, J.W., and Oh, S.A. (2022). Fabrication of 3D printed head phantom using plaster mixed with polylactic acid powder for patient-specific QA in intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Sci. Rep., 12.10.1038/s41598-022-22520-6 ↗
25. Three-dimensional printing and medical imaging: A review of the methods and applications10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.07.009 ↗
26. 3D printing applications for radiology: An overview
27. Cardiothoracic applications of 3-dimensional printing10.1097/RTI.0000000000000217 ↗
28. 3D printed phantoms mimicking cortical bone for the assessment of ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging10.1002/mp.12727 ↗
29. Establishing and running a three-dimensional and advanced imaging laboratory10.1148/rg.2018180058 ↗
30. Renal tumor quantification and classification in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT10.1016/j.patcog.2008.09.018 ↗
31. Advances in auto-segmentation10.1016/j.semradonc.2019.02.001 ↗
32. Assessment of image quality in soft tissue and bone visualization tasks for a dedicated extremity cone-beam CT system10.1007/s00330-014-3546-6 ↗
33. Principles of CT: Radiation dose and image quality10.2967/jnmt.106.037846 ↗
34. Medical 3D printing for the radiologist10.1148/rg.2015140320 ↗
35. Computed tomography tissue equivalence of 3D printing materials10.1016/j.radi.2022.02.008 ↗
36. Hepburn, H.R., Pirk, C.W., Duangphakdee, O., Hepburn, H.R., Pirk, C.W., and Duangphakdee, O. (2014). The chemistry of beeswax. Honeybee Nests: Composition, Structure, Function, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-54328-9 ↗
37. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2020). Risk Assessment of Beeswax Adulterated with Paraffin and/or Stearin/Stearic Acid When Used in Apiculture and as Food (Honeycomb). EFSA Support. Publ., 17.10.2903/sp.efsa.2020.EN-1859 ↗