Feasibility of Identifying Shale Sweet Spots by Downhole Microseismic Imaging
Source abstract
Abstract
Several studies suggest that shale sweet spots are likely associated with a low Poisson’s ratio in the shale layer. Compared with conventional geophysical techniques with active seismic data, it is straightforward and cost-effective to delineate the distribution of 3D Poisson’s ratios using microseismic data. In this study, an alternating method is proposed to determine microseismic event locations, 3D P-wave velocity, and Poisson’s ratio models with data recorded from downhole monitoring arrays. The method combines the improved 3D traveltime tomography, which inverts P and S arrivals for 3D P-wave velocity and Poisson’s ratio structures simultaneously, and a 3D grid search approach for event locations in an iterative fashion. The traveltime tomography directly inverts the Poisson’s ratio structure instead of calculating the Poisson’s ratios from P- and S-wave velocities (i.e., Vp and Vs) that are inverted by conventional traveltime tomography separately. The synthetic results and analysis suggest that the proposed method recovers the true Poisson’s ratio model reasonably. Additionally, we apply the method to a field dataset, which indicates that it may help delineate the reservoir structure and identify potential shale sweet spots.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Drilling and Well Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Schenk, C.J. (2005, January 24–29). Geologic definition of conventional and continuous accumulations in select US basins—The 2001 approach. Proceedings of the Abstract for AAPG Hedberg Research Conference on Understanding, Exploring and Developing Tight Gas Sands, Vail, CO, USA.
2. Integration of surface seismic and microseismic for the characterization of a shale gas reservoir
3. An interpretation of wide-angle compressional and shear wave data in southwest Germany: Poisson’s ratio and petrological implications10.1029/JB093iB10p12081 ↗
4. Ikwuakor, K.C. (2006, January 1–6). The Vp/Vs ratio after 40 years: Uses and abuses. Proceedings of the SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG–2006, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1190/1.2369730 ↗
5. McCormack, M., Justice, M., and Sharp, W. (1985). A Stratigraphic Interpretation of Shear and Compressional Wave Seismic Data for the Pennsylvanian Morrow Formation of Southeastern New Mexico: Chapter 13. AAPG Spec. Vol., 225–239.10.1306/M39449C13 ↗
6. V p/V s and lithology10.1190/1.1441339 ↗
7. A Comparison of Inversion Techniques for Estimating Vp/Vs from 3-C 3-D Seismic Data
8. Goodway, B., Chen, T., and Downton, J. (1997). Improved AVO fluid detection and lithology discrimination using Lamé petrophysical parameters;“λρ”,“μρ”, & “λ/μ fluid stack”, from P and S inversions. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1997, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.1190/1.1885795 ↗
9. Hampson, D.P., Russell, B.H., and Bankhead, B. (2005). Simultaneous inversion of pre-stack seismic data. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2005, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.1190/1.2148008 ↗
10. Martakis, N., Tselentis, A., Kapotas, S., and Karageorgi, E. (2003, January 2–5). Passive Seismic Tomography a Complementary Geophysical Method–Successful Case Study. Proceedings of the 65th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, Stavanger, Norway.10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.6.P065 ↗
11. Integrated passive seismic acquisition and methodology. Case Studies10.1111/j.1365-2478.2006.00584.x ↗
12. Three-dimensional Vp and Vp/Vs structure at Loma Prieta, California, from local earthquake tomography10.1029/95GL03077 ↗
13. Seismotectonics of the Loma Prieta, California, region determined from three-dimensional V p, V p/V s, and seismicity10.1029/98JB01984 ↗
14. Vp and Vp/Vs images in the Mw 6.0 Colfiorito fault region (central Italy): A contribution to the understanding of seismotectonic and seismogenic processes10.1029/2001JB001665 ↗
15. Analysis methods for kinematic data from local earthquakes10.1029/RG024i004p00793 ↗
16. Geotomography with local earthquake data10.1029/RG026i004p00659 ↗
17. Iyer, H., and Hirahara, K. (1993). Seismic Tomography: Theory and Practice, Springer Science & Business Media.
18. Hydraulic stimulation of natural fractures as revealed by induced microearthquakes, Carthage Cotton Valley gas field, east Texas10.1190/1.1567214 ↗
19. The role of passive microseismic monitoring in the instrumented oil field10.1190/1.1439012 ↗
20. Eagle Ford shale prospecting with 3D seismic data within a tectonic and depositional system framework10.1190/1.3535432 ↗
21. Valoroso, L., Improta, L., De Gori, P., Di Stefano, R., and Chiaraluce, L. (2008, January 9–12). From 3D to 4D Passive Seismic Tomography-The Sub-surface Structure Imaging of the Val d’Agri Region, Southern Italy. Proceedings of the 70th EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2008, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, Rome, Italy.10.3997/2214-4609.20147849 ↗
22. Zhang, H., Thurber, C., and Bedrosian, P. (2009). Joint inversion for vp, vs, and vp/vs at SAFOD, Parkfield, California. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 10.10.1029/2009GC002709 ↗
23. High-resolution passive seismic tomography for 3D velocity, Poisson’s ratio ν, and P-wave quality QP in the Delvina hydrocarbon field, southern Albania10.1190/1.3560016 ↗
24. Barthwal, H., and van der Baan, M. (2014, January 26–31). Passive seismic tomography using recorded microseismicity. Proceedings of the SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG–2014, Denver, CO, USA.10.1190/segam2014-0138.1 ↗
25. Vp/Vs ratios in the Yellowstone national park region, Wyoming10.1016/0377-0273(85)90057-5 ↗
26. Three-dimensional seismic image of a geothermal reservoir: The Geysers, California10.1029/95GL03321 ↗
27. Poisson’s ratio and porosity at Coso geothermal area, California10.1016/S0377-0273(99)00126-2 ↗
28. Three-dimensional anatomy of a geothermal field, Coso, southeast-central California
29. Regional tectonics of the Coso geothermal area along the intracontinental plate boundary in central eastern California: Three-dimensional Vp and Vp/Vs models, spatial-temporal seismicity patterns, and seismogenic deformation10.1029/2006JB004721 ↗
30. Kummerow, J., Reshetnikov, A., Hring, M., and Asanuma, H. (2012, January 4–7). Distribution of the Vp/Vs ratio within the Basel 1 geothermal reservoir from microseismic data. Proceedings of the 74th EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating EUROPEC 2012, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, Copenhagen, Denmark.10.3997/2214-4609.20148189 ↗
31. Analysis of induced seismicity in geothermal reservoirs—An overview10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.06.005 ↗
32. Microseismic location uncertainty
33. Hypocenter-velocity structure coupling in local earthquake tomography10.1016/0031-9201(92)90117-E ↗
34. Local earthquake tomography with flexible gridding10.1016/S0098-3004(99)00007-2 ↗
35. Concha, D., Fehler, M., Zhang, H., and Wang, P. (2010, January 1–3). Imaging of the Soultz enhanced geothermal reservoir using microseismic data. Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
36. Feasibility of joint 1D velocity model and event location inversion by the neighbourhood algorithm10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00820.x ↗
37. Microseismic event location for monitoring CO2 injection using double-difference tomography10.1190/1.3304826 ↗
38. Rodi, W., and Toksöz, M.N. (2000, January 1). Grid-search techniques for seismic event location. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual DoD/DOE Seismic Research Symposium: Planning for Verification of and Compliance with the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Dulles, Virginia.
39. Three-dimensional P and S velocity structure in the Coalinga region, California10.1029/JB095iB10p15343 ↗
40. Aldridge, D.F., Bartel, L.C., Symons, N.P., and Warpinski, N.R. (2003, January 26–31). Grid search algorithm for 3D seismic source location. Proceedings of the SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG–2003, Dallas, TX, USA.10.1190/1.1818037 ↗
41. 3-D traveltime computation using the fast marching method10.1190/1.1444558 ↗
42. Nolet, G. (1987). Waveform tomography. Seismic Tomography: With Applications in Global Seismology and Exploration Geophysics, Springer.10.1007/978-94-009-3899-1 ↗
43. Estimating geomechanical parameters from microseismic plane focal mechanisms recorded during multistage hydraulic fracturing10.1190/geo2015-0691.1 ↗
44. Changes in Vp/Vs with depth: Implications for appropriate velocity models, improved earthquake locations, and material properties of the upper crust
45. Three-dimensional P-and S-wave velocity structures beneath the Ryukyu arc10.1016/S0040-1951(03)00172-0 ↗
46. Evolution of Unconventional Hydrocarbons: Past, Present, Future and Environmental FootPrint10.25103/jestr.154.03 ↗
47. A state-of-the-art review on geothermal energy extraction, utilization, and improvement strategies: Conventional, hybridized, and enhanced geothermal systems10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100323 ↗