journal article·2012-09

The formability of aluminum foam sandwich panels

Gianluca D’Urso, Giancarlo Maccarini

Publisher page

Abstract

The present paper aims to study the formability of Aluminum Foam Sandwich (AFS) panels. At now, the final shape of foamed devices is directly obtained through the foaming process itself and no further shaping steps are expected. In any case, further manufacturing processes may be exploited to produce more complex parts. Among forming operations, bending can be regarded as one of the simplest processes for both study and application. Besides, bending tests may yield interesting information about material properties. With regard to the metal foams characterization, several bending tests on AFS panels fabricated by Alulight® were carried out by varying the process conditions. A universal testing machine was employed for this purpose, collecting data about the deformed geometry and about load vs. displacement. Even though the samples deformation was related to the occurrence of foam cells failure or collapse, once the process was terminated, they still retained a significant bending strength. The metal foams properties were also investigated using both non-destructive and mechanical tests. In particular, thickness measurements (using an ultrasonic feeler), X-ray analysis and foam density measurements were carried out on AFS specimens before the execution of both upsetting and bending tests. Finite Element simulations of the foam bending process were performed to investigate stress and strain distributions on the specimens. In particular, an isothermal plane strain model of the bending process was setup using the FEM commercial code Deform 2D. The results of this study were used to produce closed structure components (square shapes) by combining three 90° bends. A further improvement consisted in joining the open ends, to enhance shear and torsion resistance. Among joining techniques conventional welding processes (Tungsten Inert Gas—TIG and laser) and a non-conventional method (Friction Stir Welding—FSW) were investigated. Finally, the mechanical properties of the joints were characterized using both three and four point bending tests.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Material Properties and Processing · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Ashby MF, Evans AG, Fleck NA, Gibson LJ, Hutchinson JW, Wadley HNG (2000) Metal foams: a design guide. Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn
2. Banhart J (2001) Manufacture, characterization and application of cellular metals and metal foams. Prog Mater Sci 46:559–63210.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-5 ↗
3. Motz C, Friedl O, Pippa R (2005) Fatigue crack propagation in cellular metals. Int J Fatigue 27:1571–158110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.044 ↗
4. Wicklein M, Thoma K (2005) Numerical investigations of the elastic and plastic behaviour of an open-cell aluminium foam. Mater Sci Eng A397:391–39910.1016/j.msea.2005.02.052 ↗
5. Santosa S, Banhart J, Wierzbicki T (2001) Experimental and numerical analyses of bending of foam-filled sections. Acta Mech 148:199–21310.1007/BF01183678 ↗
6. Benouali A-H, Froyen L, Dillard T, Forest S, N’Guyen F (2005) Investigation on the influence of cell shape anisotropy on the mechanical performance of closed cell aluminium foams using micro-computed tomography. J Mater Sci 40:5801–581110.1007/s10853-005-4994-9 ↗
7. Sanders WS, Gibson LJ (2003) Mechanics of hollow sphere foams. Mater Sci Eng A 347:70–8510.1016/S0921-5093(02)00583-X ↗
8. Hanssen AG, Hopperstad OS, Langseth M, Ilstad H (2002) Validation of constitutive models applicable to aluminium foams. Int J Mech Sci 44:359–40610.1016/S0020-7403(01)00091-1 ↗
9. Hall IW, Guden M, Claar TD (2002) Transverse and longitudinal crushing of aluminum-foam filled tubes. Scr Mater 46:513–51810.1016/S1359-6462(02)00024-6 ↗
10. Haag FC, Gallio AF, Schaeffer L (2002) Uniaxial compression tests of aluminium foams. J Eng Manufacture 216:633–636, Part B10.1243/0954405021520148 ↗
11. Lim T-J, Smith B, McDowell DL (2002) Behavior of a random hollow sphere metal foam. Acta Mater 50:2867–287910.1016/S1359-6454(02)00111-8 ↗
12. Montanini R (2005) Measurement of strain rate sensitivity of aluminium foams for energy dissipation. Int J Mech Sci 47:26–4210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.12.007 ↗
13. Sha JB, Yip TH (2004) In situ surface displacement analysis on sandwich and multilayer beams composed of aluminum foam core and metallic face sheets under bending loading. Mater Sci Eng, A 386:91–10310.1016/j.msea.2004.07.034 ↗
14. Harte AM, Fleck NA, Ashby MF (2000) Sandwich panel design using aluminum alloy foam. Adv Eng Mater 2(4):219–22210.1002/(SICI)1527-2648(200004)2:4<219::AID-ADEM219>3.0.CO;2-# ↗
15. Bart-Smith H, Hutchinson JW, Fleck NA, Evans AG (2002) Influence of imperfections on the performance of metal foam core sandwich panels. Int J Solid Struct 39:4999–501210.1016/S0020-7683(02)00250-0 ↗
16. G D’Urso, G Pellegrini, G Maccarini (2008) Experimental and FE analysis for metal foam bending, 9th Int. Conf Tech Plasticity
17. D’Urso G, Pellegrini G, Maccarini G (2009) The formability of aluminum foam sandwiches: experimental and FEM analysis. Key Eng Mater 410–411:473–48010.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.410-411.473 ↗
18. Steeves CA, Fleck NA (2004) Collapse mechanisms of sandwich beams with composite faces and a foam core, loaded in three-point bending. Part II: experimental investigation and numerical modelling. Int J Mech Sci 46:585–60810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.04.004 ↗
19. Meguid SA, Cheon SS, El-Abbasi N (2002) FE modelling of deformation localization in metallic foams. Finite Elem Anal Des 38:631–64310.1016/S0168-874X(01)00096-8 ↗
20. Czekanski A, Elbestawi MA, Meguid SA (2005) On the FE modelling of closed-cell aluminum foam. Int J Mech Mater Des 2:23–3410.1007/s10999-005-0518-7 ↗
21. Shen H, Brinson LC (2007) Finite element modeling of porous titanium. Int J Solids Struct 44:320–33510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.04.020 ↗