journal article·2011-12

Reproducing the experimental pull-out and shear strength of clinched sheet metal connections using FEA

Sam Coppieters, Steven Cooreman, Pascal Lava, Hugo Sol, Paul Van Houtte, Dimitri Debruyne

Publisher page

Abstract

Clinching, commonly referred to as press-joining, is a mechanical joining technique which involves severe local plastic deformation of two or more sheet metal parts resulting in a permanent mechanical interlock or joint. This interlock is achieved by using simple tools like a die, a punch and a blank holder. Since no additional elements are used, the strength of the clinched connection is entirely determined by the clinch geometry, and, consequently, by the geometry of die and punch. As a result, for each combination of material and sheet thickness an optimal geometry of the tools can be derived. This can be done either through extensive experimental testing or, more cost-effectively, with the aid of numerical simulations. However, for these results to be useful they have to be able to reproduce the experimental strength of the connection. In this paper we investigate the possibility of predicting the shear and pull-out strength of a clinched sheet metal assembly using FEA. Numerical difficulties associated with these simulations and the preceding forming operation are discussed. A comparison between experimental data and simulation is provided.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics · Metallurgy and Material Forming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Nong N, Keju O, Yu Z, Zhiyuan Q, Changcheng T, Feipeng L (2003) Research on press joining technology for automotive metallic sheets. J Mater Process Technol 137:159–16310.1016/S0924-0136(02)01083-X ↗
2. Varis JP (2006) Economics of clinched joint compared to riveted joint and example of applying to a volume product. J Mater Process Technol 172:130–13810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.09.009 ↗
3. Varis JP (2003) The suitability of clinching as a joining method for high-strength structural steel. J Mater Process Technol 132:242–24910.1016/S0924-0136(02)00933-0 ↗
4. Varis JP (2002) The suitability of round clinching tools for high strength structural steel. Thin-Walled Struct 40:225–23810.1016/S0263-8231(01)00063-5 ↗
5. Varis JP (2000) A novel procedure for establishing clinching parameters for high strength steel. PhD thesis, Lappeenranta University of Technology
6. Varis JP, Lepistö J (2003) A simple testing-based procedure and simulation of the clinching process using finite element analysis for establishing clinching parameters. Thin-Walled Struct 41:691–70910.1016/S0263-8231(03)00026-0 ↗
7. Liebnig HP, Bober J, Mutschler J (1989) Verbinden von Blechteilen zwischen stempel und gravur. Sonderdruck aus Nr. 1, Seite 95/102
8. Oudjene M, Ben-Ayed L, Delamézière A, Batoz J-L (2008) Shape optimization of clinching tools using the response surface methodology with Moving Least-Square approximation. J Mater Process Technol 209:289–29610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.02.030 ↗
9. de Paula AA, Aguilar MTP, Pertence AEM, Cetlin PR (2007) Finite element simulations of the clinch joining of metallic sheets. J Mater Process Technol 182:352–35710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.08.014 ↗
10. Hamel V, Roelandt JM, Gacel JN, Schmit F (2000) Finite element modeling of clinch forming with automatic remeshing. Comput Struct 77:185–20010.1016/S0045-7949(99)00207-2 ↗
11. Neugebauer R, Kraus C, Dietrich S (2008) Advances in mechanical joining of magnesium. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 57:283–28610.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.025 ↗
12. Carboni M, Beretta S, Monno M (2006) Fatigue behaviour of tensile-shear loaded clinched joints. Eng Fract Mech 73:178–19010.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.04.004 ↗
13. Jomâa M, Billardon R (2007) Numerical analysis of the resistance to shear test of clinched assemblies of thin metal sheets. In: Proc NUMIFORM ’07. American Institute of Physics, Meville, pp 1123–1128
14. Jomâa M, Billardon R (2007) Numerical analysis of the resistance to pullout test of clinched assemblies of thin metal sheets. In: Proceedings of the 10th ESAFORM conference, pp 169–174
15. Saberi S, Enzinger N, Vallant R, Cerjak H, Hinterdorfer J, Rauch R (2008) Influence of plastic anisotropy on the mechanical behaviour of clinched joint of different coated thin steel. Int J Mater Form Suppl 1:273-27610.1007/s12289-008-0349-9 ↗
16. Abaqus. Theory manual, version 6–8.2
17. Coppieters S, Lava P, Sol H, Van Bael A, Van Houtte P, Debruyne D (2010) Determination of the flow stress and contact friction of sheet metal in a multi-layered upsetting test. J Mater Process Technol 210:1290–129610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.03.017 ↗
18. Hill R (1950) The mathematical theory of plasticity. Oxford University Press, London
19. Han H (2002) The validity of mechanical models evaluated by the modified two-specimen method under the unknown coefficient of friction and flow stress. J Mater Process Technol 159(3–10):401–408