journal article·2024-06-11Open access

Operational Risk Assessment of Engineering Vehicles Considering Driver Characteristics

Shouming Qi, Jun Teng, Xi Zhang, Ao Zheng

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 12

Abstract

As vehicles with high accident and casualty rates within the road transportation system, engineering vehicles have been receiving much attention and emphasis in terms of safety. Accurate analyses and evaluations of risk factors in vehicle operation are imperative for enhancing the management level of engineering vehicles. This study explores the differences between various types of drivers by analyzing the driving characteristics of professional drivers. The evaluation index system is developed and quantified by integrating factors related to engineering vehicle drivers, road environment, and industry management. Additionally, the risk assessment model is developed using the error backpropagation algorithm. The optimal model is determined by comparing the number of nodes in different hidden layers, the activation function, and regularization optimization. The prediction accuracy of this model’s coefficient of determination is 0.912, indicating that the model has validity. This study is conducive to improving the safety level of engineering vehicle operation in order to reduce the rate of vehicle traffic accidents, the severity of accidents, and the consequences of losses. It also has practical application value in safeguarding social security.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Traffic and Road Safety · Occupational Health and Safety Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China

Shenzhen Technology Institute of Urban Public Safety, Shenzhen 518023, China

School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Guangxi Youth Science Foundation · 2022 Guangdong Social Science Planning Project

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. (2023, December 15). Available online: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov.
2. Approaching and stopping behaviors to the intersections of aged drivers compared with young drivers10.1016/j.ergon.2015.12.002 ↗
3. Overall injury risk to different drivers: Combining exposure, frequency, and severity models10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00021-0 ↗
4. Self-reports of safe driving behaviors in relationship to sex, age, education and income in the US adult driving population10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00021-X ↗
5. Predicting motor vehicle crash involvement from a personality measure and a driving knowledge test10.1080/10852350109511209 ↗
6. Errors and Violations on the Roads: A Real Distinction?10.1080/00140139008925335 ↗
7. Risky and aggressive driving in young adults: Personality matters10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.002 ↗
8. National Center for Statistics and Analysis (2021, June 10). Large Trucks: 2016 Data, Available online: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812497.
9. National Center for Statistics and Analysis (2021, June 10). Single-Unit Straight Trucks in Traffic Crashes [R/OL], Available online: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/811740.
10. An Expert Judgment Model Applied to Estimating the Safety Effect of a Bicycle Facility10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00090-1 ↗
11. Road Safety Risk Evaluation by Means of Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators and Expert Knowledge10.1016/j.knosys.2009.07.004 ↗
12. The Palm Distribution of Traffic Conditions and Its Application to Accident Risk Assessment
13. Single-vehicle Crashes along Rural Mountainous Highways in Malaysia: An Application of Random Parameters Negative Binomial Model10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.002 ↗
14. Application of a random effects negative binomial model to examine crash frequency for freeways in China10.1016/j.physa.2018.06.088 ↗
15. Multimodal crash frequency modeling: Multivariate space-time models with alternate spatiotemporal interactions10.1016/j.aap.2018.01.034 ↗
16. Empirical Bayes Before-after Evaluation of Horizontal Curve Warning Pavement Markings on Two-lane Rural Highways in Pennsylvania10.1016/j.aap.2020.105734 ↗
17. Pourroostaei Ardakani, S., Liang, X., Mengistu, K.T., So, R.S., Wei, X., He, B., and Cheshmehzangi, A. (2023). Road Car Accident Prediction Using a Machine-Learning-Enabled Data Analysis. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15075939 ↗
18. Drivers’ knowledge, attitudes, and behavior: A cross-sectional study10.2466/pr0.102.2.411-417 ↗
19. Behavioural culpability for traffic accidents10.1016/j.trf.2018.11.004 ↗
20. How we know universals; the perception of auditory and visual forms10.1007/BF02478291 ↗
21. Zhu, Y., Ma, Y., Chen, S., Khattak, A.J., and Pang, Q. (2022). Identifying Potentially Risky Intersections for Heavy-Duty Truck Drivers Based on Individual Driving Styles. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12094678 ↗
22. Traffic violations in Guangdong province of China: Speeding and drunk driving10.1016/j.aap.2013.11.002 ↗
23. (2024, March 20). Available online: http://tocc.jtys.sz.gov.cn/#/rt/road.