journal article·2024-05-24Open access

Assessing the Sustainability of Alternative Shaft Construction Methods

António M. G. Pedro, Lucas Repsold, Jorge Almeida e Sousa

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 11

Abstract

Reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions is a global priority. The concrete industry has a major role in this reduction since it accounts for about 8% of global CO2 emissions. Despite significant improvements in the sustainability of the production of concrete, one of the best solutions is still to improve the design and construction methods, such that the required quantities of concrete are reduced. Using, as a reference, a real case study, this study compares alternative shaft construction methodologies from engineering and sustainability points of view, highlighting the advantages and drawbacks of each solution. To achieve this purpose, a back analysis is performed to ensure that the numerical model is accurately calibrated and the shaft construction methods can be adequately assessed. The results show that, while the considered methods are applicable and satisfy engineering requirements, the characteristics of the lining of the shaft could have been optimized, resulting in a reduction in CO2 emissions by at least 50% without compromising the safety of the construction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: BIM and Construction Integration · Construction Engineering and Safety · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

ISISE, ARISE, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Coimbra, 3030-788 Coimbra, Portugal

COBA Group, 1649-011 Lisbon, Portugal

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Coimbra, 3030-788 Coimbra, Portugal

Funding

national funds (PIDDAC) · Associate Laboratory Advanced Production and Intelligent Systems ARISE

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Project Everyone (2024, April 10). The Global Goals. Available online: https://www.globalgoals.org/.
2. UNFCCC (2024, April 10). The Paris Agreement. Available online: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement.
3. Lehne, J., and Preston, F. (2018). Innovation in Low-Carbon Cement and Concrete, Chatham House.
4. Towards sustainable concrete10.1038/nmat4930 ↗
5. Carbon Dioxide Emission from the Global Cement Industry10.1146/annurev.energy.26.1.303 ↗
6. Green house gas emissions due to concrete manufacture10.1065/lca2007.05.327 ↗
7. Emerging energy-efficiency and CO2 emission-reduction technologies for cement and concrete production: A technical review10.1016/j.rser.2012.07.019 ↗
8. Recent advances in the concrete industry to reduce its carbon dioxide emissions10.1016/j.envc.2020.100004 ↗
9. The carbon footprint of reinforced concrete10.1680/adcr.13.00013 ↗
10. IEA (2014). Technology Roadmap—Low-Carbon Transition in the Cement Industry, IEA.
11. Analyzing the influence factors of the carbon emissions from China’s building and construction industry from 2000 to 201510.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.200 ↗
12. Reducing embodied carbon in concrete materials: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106653 ↗
13. Sustainable development and climate change initiatives10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.008 ↗
14. A comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of three concrete mix designs10.1007/s11367-016-1045-5 ↗
15. The environmental credentials of hydraulic lime-pozzolan concretes10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.047 ↗
16. Scenario analysis of embodied greenhouse gas emissions in UK construction
17. Decision-support tool for assessing the environmental effects of constructing commercial buildings10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2006)12:4(187) ↗
18. Sustainability and geotechnical engineering: Perspectives and review10.1139/cgj-2013-0120 ↗
19. Song, X., Carlsson, C., Kiilsgaard, R., Bendz, D., and Kennedy, H. (2020). Life Cycle Assessment of Geotechnical Works in Building Construction: A Review and Recommendations. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12208442 ↗
20. Review of life-cycle-based environmental assessments of geotechnical systems
21. Direct and indirect carbon emissions in foundation construction—Two case studies of driven precast and cast-in-situ piles10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.244 ↗
22. Environmental emissions at foundation construction stage of buildings—Two case studies10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.09.002 ↗
23. Influence of concrete mix design on CO2 emissions for large wind turbine foundations10.1016/j.renene.2015.05.002 ↗
24. Embodied Energy and Gas Emissions of Retaining Wall Structures10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000507 ↗
25. Environmental assessment of earth retaining wall structures10.1680/jenge.15.00040 ↗
26. Life cycle assessment of earth-retaining walls: An environmental comparison10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.268 ↗
27. Embodied energy evaluation for sections of the UK Channel Tunnel rail link10.1680/geng.9.00018 ↗
28. Sauer, J. (2016). Ecological Considerations on the Sustainability of Tunnel Structures in the Transport Infrastructure. [Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Munich].
29. CO2 reduction in tunnel construction from a material technology point of view10.1002/geot.202200036 ↗
30. Calculation example of full cycle carbon emission of super deep foundation pit and carbon reduction measures10.1007/s44242-023-00013-7 ↗
31. First steps in the development of standardised processes for life cycle assessments of geotechnical works10.1088/1755-1315/1122/1/012046 ↗
32. Dublin Tunnel (2024, April 10). About the Dublin Tunnel. Available online: https://dublintunnel.ie/about-dublin-tunnel/.
33. Modelling the excavation of elliptical shafts in the geotechnical centrifuge10.1201/9780429438646-3 ↗
34. Cabarkapa, Z., Milligan, G.W.E., Menkiti, C.O., Murphy, J., and Potts, D.M. (2003, January 2–5). Design and performance of a large diameter shaft in Dublin Boulder Clay. Proceedings of the BGA International Conference on Foundations: Innovations, Observations, Design and Practice, Dundee, UK.
35. Case studies of circular shaft construction in London
36. The engineering geology and characterization of Dublin Boulder Clay10.1144/1470-9236/04-038 ↗
37. Geotechnical properties of Dublin boulder clay10.1680/geot.2007.57.7.595 ↗
38. Bentley Systems (2022). CONNECT Edition V22.02 PLAXIS 2D—Reference Manual, Bentley Systems.
39. Dublin Tunnel (2024, April 10). Press. Available online: https://dublintunnel.ie/wp-content/uploads/pdf/dublin-tunnel-press-pack.pdf.
40. Finite element analyses of steep man-made cuts in Dublin boulder clay10.1139/T07-111 ↗
41. Kovacevic, N., Menkiti, C.O., Long, M., and Potts, D.M. (2015). Geotechnical Engineering for Infrastructure and Development, Emerald Publishing Ltd.
42. Roscoe, K.H., and Burland, J. (1968). Engineering Plasticity, Cambridge University Press.
43. A new Hvorslev surface for critical state type unsaturated and saturated constitutive models10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.09.010 ↗
44. On the assessment of energy dissipated through hysteresis in finite element analysis10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.09.001 ↗
45. Tsiampousi, A., Kontoe, S., and Taborda, D.M.G. (2023). IC MAGE Model 06—Modified Cam-Clay Model with a Non-Linear Hvorslev Surface and Isotropic Small Strain Shear Stiffness, Version 1.6, Zenodo.
46. Sloan (1987). Substepping schemes for the numerical integration of elastoplastic stress–strain relations. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 24, 893–911.10.1002/nme.1620240505 ↗
47. Refined explicit integration of elastoplastic models with automatic error control10.1108/02644400110365842 ↗
48. Taborda, D.M.G., Kontoe, S., and Tsiampousi, A. (2023). IC MAGE UMIP—Universal Model Interface for PLAXIS, Version 3.5, Zenodo.
49. Modeling sand response using two-surface plasticity10.1016/j.compgeo.2008.02.009 ↗
50. A sequential method for selecting parameter values in the Barcelona basic model10.1139/T10-017 ↗
51. Derivation of model parameters for numerical analysis of the Ivens shaft excavation10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.12.005 ↗
52. Donohue, S., Gavin, K., Long, M., and O’Connor, P. (2003, January 3). Gmax from multichannel analysis of surface waves for Dublin boulder clay. Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Prague, Czech Republic.
53. Numerical modelling of the Ivens shaft construction in Lisbon, Portugal
54. (2006). Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirement and Guidelines (Standard No. ISO 14044:2006).
55. (2006). Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework (Standard No. ISO 14040:2006).
56. (2019). Sustainability of Construction Works—Environmental Product Declarations—Core Rules for the Product Category of Construction Products (Standard No. EN 15804:2012+A2:2019).
57. Database for retaining wall and ground movements due to deep excavations10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:3(203) ↗
58. Clough, G.W., and O’Rourke, T.D. (1990). Proceedings of the Design and Performance of Earth Retaining Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers.
59. Brangan, C. (2007). Behaviour of Deep Excavation in Dublin Glacial Till. [Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University College Dublin].