journal article·2009-09Open access

Substructuring in the implicit simulation of single point incremental sheet forming

A. Hadoush, A. H. van den Boogaard

Abstract

This paper presents a direct substructuring method to reduce the computing time of implicit simulations of single point incremental forming (SPIF). Substructuring is used to divide the finite element (FE) mesh into several non-overlapping parts. Based on the hypothesis that plastic deformation is localized, the substructures are categorized into two groups: the plastic—nonlinear—substructures and the elastic—pseudo-linear—substructures. The plastic substructures assemble a part of the FE mesh that is in contact with the forming tool; they are iteratively updated respecting all nonlinearities. The elastic substructures model the elastic deformation of the rest of the FE mesh. For these substructures, the geometrical and the material behaviour are assumed linear within the increment. The stiffness matrices and the internal force vectors are calculated at the beginning of each increment then they are statically condensed to eliminate the internal degrees of freedom (DOF). In the iteration process the condensed stiffness matrices for the elastic substructures are kept constant. The condensed internal force vectors are updated by the multiplication of the condensed stiffness matrices and the displacement increments. After convergence, any geometrical and material nonlinearity for the elastic substructures are nonlinearly updated. The categorization of substructures in plastic and elastic domains is adapted during the simulation to capture the tool motion. The resulting, plastic and condensed elastic, set of equations is solved on a single processor. In an example with 1600 shell elements, the presented substructuring of the SPIF implicit simulation is 2.4 times faster than the classical implicit simulation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Laser and Thermal Forming Techniques · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. Leszak E (1967) Apparatus and process for incremental dieless forming. Patent US3342051A1
2. Matsubara S (1994) Incremental backward bulge forming of a sheet metal with a hemispherical tool. J Jpn Soc Technol Plast 35:1311–1316
3. Bambach M, Hirt G, Ames J (2004) Modelling of optimization strategies in the incremental sheet metal forming process. NUMIFORM, Columbus, Ohio10.1063/1.1766822 ↗
4. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL (2005) The finite element method for solid and structural mechanics. Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, pp 48–51
5. Jeswiet J (2005) Asymmetric incremental sheet forming. Adv Mater Res 6–8:35–5810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.6-8.35 ↗
6. Emmens WC, van den Boogaard AH (2008) An overview of stabilizing deformation mechanisms in incremental sheet forming. J Mater Process Technol. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.10.003
7. Hirt G, Junk S, Witulski N (2002) Incremental sheet forming: quality evaluation and process simulation. 7th ICTP Incremental conference on Technology of Plasticity. Yokohama, Japan
8. Belytschko T, Yen HJ, Mullen R (1979) Mixed methods in time integration. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 17–18:259–27510.1016/0045-7825(79)90022-7 ↗
9. Hughes TJR, Liu WK (1978) Implicit-explicit finite elements in transient analysis: implementation an numerical examples. J Appl Mech 45:375–37810.1115/1.3424305 ↗
10. Smith BF, Bjorstad PE, Gropp WD (1996) Domain decomposition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 101–107
11. Miyamura T, Noguchi H, Shioya R, Yoshimura S, Yagawa G (2002) Elastic–plastic analysis of nuclear structures with millions of DOFs using the hierarchical domain decomposition method. Nucl Eng Des 212:335–35510.1016/S0029-5493(01)00497-6 ↗
12. Park K, Yang DY (2000) Mismatching refinement with domain decomposition for the analysis of steady state metal forming process. Int J Numer Methods Eng 48:1089–110610.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000710)48:7<1089::AID-NME918>3.0.CO;2-4 ↗
13. Qingchun Y, Shengnian Q, Qi Z, Naiyan M (1997) FE simulation method for a forging system. J Mater Process Technol 63:678–68310.1016/S0924-0136(96)02706-9 ↗
14. Quigley E, Monagan J (2002) The finite element modelling of conventional spinning using multi domain models. J Mater Process Technol 124:360–36510.1016/S0924-0136(02)00259-5 ↗
15. Belytschko T, Liu WK, Moran B (2007) Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures. Wiley, London, pp 319–325