An appearance-based measure of surface defects
Source abstract
Abstract
Surface defects on sheet metal panels such as local out-of-plane geometric deviations, cause unwanted deviations from the intended visual appearance. In the automobile industry, these defects are commonly graded for visual acceptability through reflection analysis on the hardware. This widely used method is unfortunately subjective and thus has low repeatability. The same method can be applied on simulated sheet metal panels by the use of ray-tracing. In this paper we present an objective, appearance-based, measure by formalising the approach of subjective reflection analysis. Hence, a natural connection between an objective measure and the appearance is obtained making it easy to establish acceptable levels. The performance of this measure and three other objective measures is discussed and demonstrated for a real panel and a panel geometry obtained through sheet forming simulations. These examples illustrate that different measures yield different information about the geometry, and the proposed measure gives a useful quantification of the visual appearance deviation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. Mattiasson K (2000) On finite element simulation of sheet metal forming processes in industry. In: Eccomas 2000, Barcelona
2. Kolodziejski J, Assempoor A, Liu S (1994) An approach for designing out surface defects in metal stampings. SAE Technical Pap Ser 94075010.4271/940750 ↗
3. Dutton T, Pask E (1998) Simulation of surface defects in sheet metal panels. In: Simul of Mater Process: Theory, Methods and Applications, Huétink & Baaijens, Rotterdam, pp 869–874
4. Andersson A (2005) Evaluation and visualization of surface defects—a numerical and experimental study on sheet metal parts. In: Numisheet 2005 Conference proceedings, AIP, pp 113–11810.1063/1.2011203 ↗
5. Qiu Y, Konieczny A, Sing B (1997) An integration of One-step FEM global analysis with incremental FEM local analysis of surface defects of auto body panels. In: IBEC ’97 Adv Body Concept and Dev, pp 7–11
6. Sawada T, Liu L (1998) Proposal for analysis of surface deflections of sheet metal in embossing. In: Simul of Mater Process: Theory, Methods and Applications, Huétink & Baaijens, Rotterdam, pp 863–868
7. Hayashi H (1996) The control of shape fixation and springback of aluminium alloy sheet in model forming. SAE Technical Pap Ser 960819
8. Liu L, Sawada T, Sakamoto M (2000) Evaluation of the surface deflections in pressed automobile panels by an optical reflection method. J Mater Process Technology 103:280–28710.1016/S0924-0136(00)00485-4 ↗
9. Yoshida K (1993) Handbook of ease or difficulty in press formings. National Center for Manufacturing Sciences, Michigan, USA
10. Sing B, Konieczny A (1997) Changing of stamping process design and practice due to integrated design approach to car body quality enhancement. SAE Technical Pap Ser 97098310.4271/970983 ↗
11. Kase K, Makinouchi A, Nakagawa T, Suzuki H, Kimura F (1999) Shape error evaluation of free-form surfaces. Comp Aided Des 31:495–50510.1016/S0010-4485(99)00046-9 ↗
12. Singh B, D’Silva D (1998) A virtual environment to develop car body quality. SAE Technical Pap Ser 98236910.4271/982369 ↗
13. Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992) A Method for Registration of 3D Shapes. IEEE Trans on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intell 14.2:239–25610.1109/34.121791 ↗