Anisotropic behavior and micromechanisms of Ti60 alloy sheet
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The mechanical anisotropy of near-α titanium alloys under high-temperature service conditions plays a critical role in determining their formability and structural reliability. In this study, a Ti60 rolled plate was selected as the research material, and the evolution of tensile anisotropy along the RD, TD, and DD was systematically investigated at room temperature and within the temperature range of 720-840°C. The results reveal that the anisotropy of yield strength in the Ti60 plate can be divided into three distinct stages. At room temperature, the yield strengths along the TD and RD are comparable and higher than that along the DD, following the order TD>RD>DD. In the intermediate temperature range of 720-780°C, the yield strengths along the RD and DD become comparable and are lower than that along the TD, maintaining the same ranking of TD>RD>DD. At 840°C, the yield strengths along the TD and RD become comparable, while the anisotropy exhibits a reversal, following the order DD>RD>TD. Based on texture data obtained from EBSD analysis, the distributions and average values of the Schmid factors for the primary slip systems along the three directions were calculated. Combined with the temperature-dependent variations in the critical resolved shear stress (CRSS) of different slip systems, a slip activity parameter was introduced to quantitatively elucidate the origins of mechanical anisotropy. The results indicate that at room temperature, plastic deformation is primarily governed by prismatic slip and basal slip, together with non-thermally activated path-controlled mechanisms, which collectively influence the anisotropic behavior of the titanium alloy. The ranking of slip activity, DD>RD>TD, provides a reasonable explanation for the observed yield strength anisotropy at room temperature. In the intermediate temperature range of 720-780°C, plastic deformation becomes increasingly dependent on thermally activated dislocation slip, and the yield strength exhibits a strong negative correlation with slip activity. Although the CRSS values of various slip systems decrease significantly, their rates of reduction differ, leading to the concurrent activation of multiple ⟨a⟩-type slip systems and resulting in the yield strength along the RD decreasing to a level comparable to that along the DD. When the temperature reaches 840°C, the dominant deformation mechanism undergoes a fundamental transition, shifting to grain boundary sliding-dominated deformation accompanied by the simultaneous activation of multiple dislocation slip systems, which ultimately leads to the reversal of yield strength anisotropy at 840°C.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Williams JC, Boyer RR (2020) Opportunities and issues in the application of titanium alloys for aerospace components. Metals 10(6):70510.3390/met10060705 ↗
2. Pagan DC, Bernier JV, Dale D, Ko JP, Turner TJ, Blank B, Shade PA (2018) Measuring ti-7al slip system strengths at elevated temperature using high-energy x-ray diffraction. Scripta Mater 142:96–10010.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.08.029 ↗
3. Dai Y, Xiao Y, Zeng W, Jia R, Jia W (2024) Mechanism of crystallographic orientation and texture evolution of ti60 alloy during plane strain compression. Metals 14(3):35910.3390/met14030359 ↗
4. Wu Y, Fan R, Chen M, Wang K, Zhao J, Xiao W (2021) High-temperature anisotropic behaviors and microstructure evolution mechanisms of a near-$$\alpha $$ ti-alloy sheet. Mater Sci Eng, A 820:14156010.1016/j.msea.2021.141560 ↗
5. Kumar PSR, Mashinini PM (2025) Titanium alloys for aerospace structures and engines. In: Aerospace materials. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 227–25310.1016/B978-0-443-22118-7.00009-9 ↗
6. Kuczyńska-Zemła D, Lucas MM, Lavisse L, Zemła M, Herbst F, Pacorel V, Kwaśniak P (2025) Microstructural influence on high-temperature oxidation of near-$$\alpha $$ titanium alloys: Timetal 834 and 6242s. Corros Sci 255:11308110.1016/j.corsci.2025.113081 ↗
7. Wanjara P, Jahazi M, Monajati H, Yue S (2006) Influence of thermomechanical processing on microstructural evolution in near-$$\alpha $$ alloy imi834. Mater Sci Eng, A 416(1–2):300–31110.1016/j.msea.2005.10.042 ↗
8. Tang J, Wang Y, Wang S, Cai M, Xu Z (2025) Composition design and microstructure optimization of a metastable $$\beta $$-type titanium alloy with ultrahigh strength. Adv Eng Mater 27(7):2402099–2402099. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADEM.20240209910.1002/ADEM.202402099 ↗
9. Dong S, Gong Z, Chen Z, Qu Y, Chen R, Liu S, Li G (2024) High temperature tensile creep behavior and microstructure evolution of ti60 alloy rolled sheet. Mater Today Commun 41:110805–110805. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTCOMM.2024.11080510.1016/J.MTCOMM.2024.110805 ↗
10. Wu T, Gao Z, Chen M, Dong H (2025) Data-driven time series analysis for high-temperature deformation behavior prediction based on the deep learning approach: A case study on titanium alloy. J Alloy Compd 1037:182233–182233. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2025.18223310.1016/J.JALLCOM.2025.182233 ↗
11. Yang X, Shen D, Wang Q, Su Y, Liu Y, Guo Z, Xiong R, Meng Y, Feng Z, Hao S, Ma T, Li W (2025) Microstructure control and high-temperature mechanical response of ta15 titanium alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. Mater Today Commun 49:114072–114072. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTCOMM.2025.11407210.1016/J.MTCOMM.2025.114072 ↗
12. Materials selection of optimized titanium alloys for aircraft applications (2018). Mater Res 21(2)10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-0979 ↗
13. Ma XZ, Xiang ZL, Ma MZ, Cui YP, Ren WM, Wang ZT, Huang JC, Chen ZY (2020) Investigation of microstructures, textures, mechanical properties and fracture behaviors of a newly developed near $$\alpha $$ titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng, A 775:138996–138996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.13899610.1016/j.msea.2020.138996 ↗
14. Le C, Zihao M, Binbin Z, Changyu Z, Xiaohua H (2023) Understanding the anisotropic tensile deformation behavior of commercially pure titanium by experiments and crystal plasticity simulations. Mater Lett 339. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATLET.2023.13409510.1016/J.MATLET.2023.134095 ↗
15. Wu P, Chen Q, Hu D, Lou Y (2026) Analytical modeling of anisotropic-strength differential hardening with low strength under plane strain tension for we43 alloy. Acta Mech Sin 42(5):424340–424340. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10409-025-24340-X10.1007/S10409-025-24340-X ↗
16. Pei G, Qizhi W (2022) Structural mechanics model for anisotropic damage and fatigue life prediction method of face-centered cubic metal materials. Intern J Fatigue 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2021.10665710.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2021.106657 ↗
17. Wu P, Lou Y (2025) Fracture characteristic of mg-gd-y alloy in wide stress state: Experiment and modeling. Eng Fract Mech 325:111354–111354. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGFRACMECH.2025.11135410.1016/J.ENGFRACMECH.2025.111354 ↗
18. Zhang B, Zhao Z, Wang Q, Liu J, Yang R (2023) The effect of deformation temperature on the microstructure and crystallographic orientation evolution of ti60 alloy after annealing. Mater Sci Eng, A 880:14536010.1016/j.msea.2023.145360 ↗
19. Zhao ZB, Liu Z, Wang QJ, Liu JR, Yang R (2019) Analysis of local crystallographic orientation in an annealed ti60 billet. J Mater Sci Technol 35(04):591–59510.1016/j.jmst.2018.10.014 ↗
20. Li W, Chen Z, Liu J, Zhu S, Sui G, Wang Q (2019) Rolling texture and its effect on tensile property of a near-$${\alpha }$$ titanium alloy ti60 plate. J Mater Sci Technol 35(05):790–79810.1016/j.jmst.2018.10.032 ↗
21. Li W, Chen Z, Liu J, Wang Q, Sui G (2017) Effect of texture on anisotropy at 600$$\circ $$c in a near-$${\alpha }$$ titanium alloy ti60 plate. Mater Sci Eng, A 688:322–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.09810.1016/j.msea.2017.01.098 ↗
22. Liu S, Niu H, Liu J, Cao P, Yang W (2025) Coupling effects of interlayer holes and $${\alpha }$$-ti variants on mechanical properties and anisotropy of additively manufactured titanium alloy. Mater Charact 223:114954–114954. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATCHAR.2025.11495410.1016/J.MATCHAR.2025.114954 ↗
23. Yu W, Lv Y, Li S, Wang Y, Li B, Liao Z (2015) Mechanism of the anisotropy of yield ratio in ta5 titanium alloy plates. Mater Sci Eng, A 639:314–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.04.08310.1016/j.msea.2015.04.083 ↗
24. Yanli L, Yifan W, Yibo S, Junpeng L, Kelin C, Zhubin H (2023) Identification of anisotropic coefficients in the non-principal axis directions of tubular materials using hole bulging test. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 16(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/MA1613462910.3390/MA16134629 ↗
25. Li B, Fan J, Zhang W, Zhao J, Zhao D, Tao H, Hao X, Wang F, Jiang P, Kou H, Li J (2025) Texture evolution and anisotropy of ta18 titanium alloy strip under rolling and heat treatment conditions. J Market Res 34:1582–1590. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMRT.2024.12.14210.1016/J.JMRT.2024.12.142 ↗
26. Wei L, Songsong L, Hui Y (2022) Research on the anisotropy of plastic behavior and deformation mechanism of textured pure titanium. Mater Character 194. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATCHAR.2022.11248310.1016/J.MATCHAR.2022.112483 ↗
27. Behnam A, Orestis P, William VH, M, HJ, J, BI, Christos T (2024) Data-driven texture design for reducing elastic and plastic anisotropy in titanium alloys. Acta Materialia 265:119585. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2023.11958510.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2023.119585 ↗
28. Wu P, Chen Q, Zhou L, Liang X, Lou Y (2026) Analytical model to characterize temperature-dependent anisotropic-asymmetric behavior of mg-gd-y alloy. J Magnesium Alloys 14:101624–101624. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMA.2024.11.03510.1016/J.JMA.2024.11.035 ↗
29. Pan B, Shen F, Sampathkumar SR, Münstermann S (2024) Modeling strain hardening of metallic materials with sigmoidal function considering temperature and strain rate effects. Materials 17(16):3950–3950. https://doi.org/10.3390/MA1716395010.3390/MA17163950 ↗
30. Yong W, Ronglei F, Minghe C, Kehuan W, Jie Z, Wenchao X (2021) High-temperature anisotropic behaviors and microstructure evolution mechanisms of a near-$${\alpha }$$ ti-alloy sheet. Mater Sci Eng A 820. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEA.2021.14156010.1016/J.MSEA.2021.141560 ↗
31. Guo B, Gao H, Kong C, Wang Z, Cui H, Yu H (2025) Transverse texture weakening and anisotropy improvement of ti-6al-4v alloy sheet via asymmetric rolling and static recrystallization annealing. J Alloy Compd 1010:177507–177507. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2024.17750710.1016/J.JALLCOM.2024.177507 ↗
32. Li Y, Gao P, Yu J, Jin S, Chen S, Zhan M (2022) Mesoscale deformation mechanisms in relation with slip and grain boundary sliding in ta15 titanium alloy during tensile deformation. J Mater Sci Technol 98(03):72–8610.1016/j.jmst.2021.05.008 ↗
33. Qi Q, Zheng-qing L, Yong J, Yi-ren W, Xing-long A, Min S (2021) Basal stacking fault induced twin boundary gliding, twinning disconnection and twin growth in hcp ti from the first-principles. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 31(2):382–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(21)65503-610.1016/S1003-6326(21)65503-6 ↗
34. Furuhara T, Poorganji B, Abe H, Maki T (2007) Dynamic recovery and recrystallization in titanium alloys by hot deformation. JOM 59(1):64–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-007-0013-810.1007/s11837-007-0013-8 ↗
35. Wang Y, Li Z, Wang H, Hou M, Yu K, Xu Y, Xiao H (2024) Flow behavior and dynamic recrystallization mechanism of a new near-alpha titanium alloy ti-0.3mo-0.8ni-2al-1.5zr. J Market Res 30:3863–3876. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMRT.2024.04.07610.1016/J.JMRT.2024.04.076 ↗
36. Wang K, Li H, Zhou Y, Wang J, Xin R, Liu Q (2023) Dislocation slip and crack nucleation mechanism in dual-phase microstructure of titanium alloys: A review. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters) 36(3):353–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40195-022-01505-410.1007/S40195-022-01505-4 ↗
37. Kawano Y, Sato M, Mayama T, Mitsuhara M, Yamasaki S (2020) Quantitative evaluation of slip activity in polycrystalline $${\alpha }$$-titanium considering non-local interactions between crystal grains. Int J Plast 127:102638–102638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.12.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2019.12.001 ↗
38. Hémery S, Ali AN, Smerdova O, Tromas C (2024) Deformation mechanisms in the $${\alpha }$$ phase of the ti-6al-2sn-4zr-2mo titanium alloy: In situ experiments and simulations. Int J Plast 175:103947. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPLAS.2024.10394710.1016/J.IJPLAS.2024.103947 ↗
39. Wang L, Zheng Z, Phukan H, Kenesei P, Park J-S, Lind J, Suter RM, Bieler TR (2017) Direct measurement of critical resolved shear stress of prismatic and basal slip in polycrystalline ti using high energy x-ray diffraction microscopy. Acta Mater 132:598–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.01510.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.015 ↗
40. Williams JC, Baggerly RG, Paton NE (2002) Deformation behavior of hcp ti-al alloy single crystals. Metallurgic Mater Trans A Phys Metallurg Mater Sci 33(3):837–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-002-0153-y10.1007/s11661-002-0153-y ↗
41. Li H, Mason DE, Bieler TR, Boehlert CJ, Crimp MA (2013) Methodology for estimating the critical resolved shear stress ratios of $${\alpha }$$-phase ti using ebsd-based trace analysis. Acta Mater 61(20):7555–7567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.08.04210.1016/j.actamat.2013.08.042 ↗
42. Hémery S, Villechaise P, Banerjee D (2020) Microplasticity at room temperature in $$\alpha $$/$$\beta $$ titanium alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 51(10):4931–496910.1007/s11661-020-05945-4 ↗
43. He S, Zeng W, Zhao Z, Xu J, Zhou D (2022) Analysis of anisotropy mechanism in relation with slip activity in near $$\alpha $$ titanium alloy pipe after pilger cold rolling. J Alloy Compd 909:16478510.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164785 ↗
44. Li H, Li C, Chen D, Liu Y, Zhao Z, Zhang B, Qi M, Liu J, Wang Q (2025) Temperature-dependent deformation mechanisms in ti65 alloy: An in situ tensile study. Materials 18(14):3270–3270. https://doi.org/10.3390/MA1814327010.3390/MA18143270 ↗
45. Hémery S, Tromas C, Villechaise P (2019) Slip-stimulated grain boundary sliding in ti-6al-4v at room temperature. Materialia 5:10018910.1016/j.mtla.2018.100189 ↗
46. Liang C, Wang N, Chen Y, Jiang C, Wu G, Zhao Q, Zhu L, Luo J (2023) Transition of low and high-angle grain boundaries during strain rate-induced dislocation storage and annihilation. Mater Charact 205:11328410.1016/j.matchar.2023.113284 ↗
47. Rui S-S, Han Q-N, Wang X, Li S, Ma X, Su Y, Cai Z, Du D, Shi H-J (2021) Correlations between two ebsd-based metrics kernel average misorientation and image quality on indicating dislocations of near-failure low alloy steels induced by tensile and cyclic deformations. Mater Today Commun 27:10244510.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102445 ↗
48. Zhou J, Wu M, Zhang W, Ning J (2025) High-temperature deformation behaviors of gradient-structured mg-gd-y-zr alloys at high strain rates. Materials 18(17):408510.3390/ma18174085 ↗
49. Zhao Y, Toth LS, Massion R, Skrotzki W (2018) Role of grain boundary sliding in texture evolution for nanoplasticity. Adv Eng Mater 20(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20170021210.1002/adem.201700212 ↗
50. Langdon TG (2006) Grain boundary sliding revisited: Developments in sliding over four decades. J Mater Sci 41(3):597–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-6476-010.1007/s10853-006-6476-0 ↗