journal article·2021-01Open access

Experimental and numerical studies of process variabilities in biaxial carbon fiber braids

Ruben Czichos, Oscar Bareiro, Anthony K. Pickett, Peter Middendorf, Thomas Gries

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates the manufacture of biaxial carbon fiber braids and the influence that different machine settings have on variability of the textile architecture produced. In parallel, numerical simulations of the braiding process with these different machine settings have been conducted. For these studies yarn tension and process speed are varied to generate cylindrical biaxial braids with an average braid angle of±45°. The overall preform quality is characterized by means of variability in braid angle, yarn width, cover factor and fiber damage, using a variety of experimental techniques. Furthermore, from the final infused composite variations in yarn cross-section dimensions have been measured. A method is presented to transfer braid process simulation results to a detailed three dimensional finite element model of the architecture using a technique based on thermal expansion and compaction simulation. This method also allows the possibility to introduce experimentally observed variability in yarn cross-section dimensions. Such a model provides a valuable starting point for mesoscopic infusion or mechanical analysis of the textile composite. A comparison between experimental and numerical results shows that the process simulation can well reproduce the real braid angles in terms of mean value and scatter under different machine configurations and that the meso-scale textile model gives a good reproduction of the true textile architecture.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Pickett A, Erber A, von Reden T, Drechsler K (2009) Comparison of analytical and finite element simulation of 2D braiding. Plast Rubber Compos 38(9/10):387–39510.1179/146580109X12540995045769 ↗
2. Tabatabaei SA (2016) Meso-finite element Modelling of textile composites using mesh superposition method. Dissertation, KU Leuven
3. Pickett A, Sirtautas J, Erber A (2009) Braiding simulation and prediction of mechanical properties. Appl Compos Mater 16(6):345–36410.1007/s10443-009-9102-x ↗
4. Heieck F (2019) Potenzial einer optischen 3D-Preformanalyse zur Qualitätsbestimmung von Faser-Kunststoff-Verbunden. Dissertation, University of Stuttgart
5. Heieck F, Hermann F, Middendorf P and Schladitz K (2016) Influence of the cover factor of 2D biaxial and triaxial braided carbon composites on their in-plane mechanical properties. Composite Structures 163:114–12210.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.025 ↗
6. Kyosev Y (2015) Braiding technology for textiles. Woodhead, Cambridge
7. Ebel C (2013) Effects of fiber damage on the efficiency of the braiding process, in Composites Week @ Leuven and TexComp-11 Conference, Leuven
8. Matveev MY (2015) Effects of variabilities on mechanical properties of textile composites. Dissertation, The University of Nottingham
9. Rawal A, Potluri P, Steele C (2005) Geometrical modelling of the yarn paths in three-dimensional braided structures. J Ind Text 35:115–13510.1177/1528083705057574 ↗
10. Rawal A, Potluri P, Steele C (2007) Prediction of yarn paths in braided structures formed on a square pyramid. J Ind Text 36:221–22610.1177/1528083707072354 ↗
11. van Ravenhorst JH (2018) Design tools for circular overbraiding of complex mandrels. PhD Thesis, University of Twente
12. van Ravenhorst J, Akkerman R (2016) Overbraiding simulation. In: Advances in braiding technology. Woodhead Publishing by Elsevier, Amsterdam, Boston, Cambridge, pp 431–455
13. van Ravenhorst J, Akkerman R (2016) A yarn interaction model for circular braiding. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 81:254–26310.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.026 ↗
14. Lengersdorf M, Multhoff J, Linke M, Gries T (2013) Simulative design of overbraided pressure vessel for hydrogen storage, In: Hoa, Suong Van; Hubert, Pascal (Eds.): ICCM19 : 19th International Conference on Composite Materials, Montreal, Canada
15. Swery EE, Hans T, Bultez M, Wijaya W, Kelly P, Hinterhölzl R and Bickerton S (2017) Complete simulation process chain for the manufacturing of braided composite parts. Composites Part A 102:378–39010.1016/j.compositesa.2017.08.011 ↗
16. Hans T, Cichosz J, Brand M, Hinterhölzl R (2015) Finite element simulation of the braiding process for arbitrary mandrel shapes. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf:124–13210.1016/j.compositesa.2015.06.003 ↗
17. Sun X, Kawashita LF, Wollmann T, Spitzer S, Langkamp A, Gude M (2018) Experimental and numerical studies on the braiding of carbon fibres over structured end-fittings for the design and manufacture of high performance hybrid shafts. Prod Eng 12:215–22810.1007/s11740-018-0824-1 ↗
18. Grave G et al. (2009) Simulation of 3D overbraiding – solutions and challenges, Greenville, SC, USA
19. Boehler P (2019) Einzelfadenbasierte Modellierung von textilen Preform-Prozessen. Dissertation, University of Stuttgart
20. Page J, Wang J (2002) Prediction of shear force using 3D non-linear FEM analyses for a plain weave carbon fabric in a bias extension state. Finite Elem Anal Des:755–76410.1016/S0168-874X(01)00104-4 ↗
21. Gasser A, Boisse P, Hanklar S (1999) Mechanical behaviour of dry fabric reinforcements. 3D simulations versus biaxial tests. Comput Mater Sci 17:7–2010.1016/S0927-0256(99)00086-5 ↗
22. Potluri P, Sagar TV (2008) Compaction modelling of textile preforms for composite structures. Compos Struct 86(1–3):177–18510.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.019 ↗
23. Green SD, Long AC, El Said BS, Hallett SR (2013) Numerical modelling of 3D woven preform deformations. Compos Struct 108:747–75610.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.015 ↗
24. Thompson AJ, El Said B, Ivanov D, Belnoue JP-H, Hallett SR (2018) High fidelity modelling of the compression behaviour of 2D woven fabrics. Int J Solids Struct 154:104–11310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.06.027 ↗
25. Vinot M, Holzapfel M, Jemmali R (2015) "Numerical investigation of carbon braided composites at the Mesoscale: using computer tomography as a validation tool," in 10th European LS-DYNA Conference, Würzburg, Germany
26. Verpoest I, Lomov SV (2005) Virtual textile composites software WiseTex: integration with micro-mechanical, permeability and structural analysis. Compos Sci Technol 65(15-16):2563–257410.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.031 ↗
27. Long AC, Brown LP (2011) Modelling the geometry of textile reinforcements for composites: TexGen," Woodhead Publishing Series in Composites Science and Engineering, pp. 239–264
28. Tabatabaei SA, Lomov SV, Verpoest I (2014) Assessment of embedded elements technique in meso-FE modelling of fibre reinforced composites. Compos Struct 107:436–44610.1016/j.compstruct.2013.08.020 ↗
29. De Carvalho NV, Pinho ST, Robinson P (2012) Numerical modelling of woven composites: biaxial loading. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 43(8):1326–133710.1016/j.compositesa.2012.03.017 ↗
30. Doitrand A, Fagiano C, Irisarri F-X, Hirsekorn M (2015) Comparison between voxel and consistent meso-scale models of woven composites. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 73:143–15410.1016/j.compositesa.2015.02.022 ↗
31. Grail G, Hirsekorn M, Wendling A, Hivet G, Hambli R (2013) Consistent finite element mesh generation for meso-scale modelling of textile composites with preformed and compacted reinforcements. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 55:143–15110.1016/j.compositesa.2013.09.001 ↗
32. Bauer C, Glatt E, Wiegmann A (2017) The prediction of mechanical properties of composites and porous materials based on micro-CT-scans and 3D material models, in NAFEMS World Congress, Stockholm, Sweden
33. Liu Y, Straumit I, Vasiukov D, Lomov SV, Panier S (2016) "Multi-scale material model for 3D composite using micro CT images geometry reconstruction," in 17th European Conference on Composite Materials (ECCM), Munich, Germany
34. Toho Tenax (2010) Datasheet of yarn material HTS40. https://www.swiss-composite.ch/pdf/t-Tenax-Datenblatt.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2019
35. Cherif C (2011) Textile Werkstoffe für den Leichtbau - Techniken. Springer-Verlag, Verfahren, Materialien, Eigenschaften, Berlin, Heidelberg10.1007/978-3-642-17992-1 ↗
36. Siebertz K, van Bebber D, Hochkirchen T (2010) Statistische Versuchsplanung - Design of Experiments (DoE). Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-3-642-05493-8 ↗
37. Miene A, Herrmann AS, Göttinger M (2008) Quality assurance by digital image analysis for the preforming and draping process of dry carbon Fiber material, in SAMPE Europe International Conference and Forum, Paris, France
38. Miene A, Heumüller M, Weiland F, Weimer C (2011) Quality assurance system for aircraft structural profile preforms, in SETEC 11., Leiden, Netherlands
39. Cichosz JA (2016) Experimental characterization and numerical modeling of the mechanical response for biaxial braided composites. Dissertation, Technische Universität München
40. Nasdala L (2015) FEM-Formelsammlung Statik und Dynamik. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden10.1007/978-3-658-06630-7 ↗
41. Cornelissen B, Akkerman R 2009 Analysis of yarn bending behaviour, in 17th International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM 17), Edinburgh, United Kingdom
42. Gere J, Timoshenko S (1997) Mechanics of materials, 4th edition. PWS Publishing Company, Boston
43. Livermore Software Technology Corporation (2019) LS-DYNA theory manual. https://www.lstc.com/download/manuals. Accessed 20 March 2019
44. Nilakantan G, Cox B, Sudre O (2017) Generation of realistic stochastic virtual microstructures using a novel thermal growth method for woven fabrics and textile composites, in American Society for Composites 32nd Technical Conference, West Lafayette10.12783/asc2017/15180 ↗