Improved predictability of forming limit curves through microstructural inputs
Source abstract
Abstract
Forming Limit Curves (FLCs) were determined experimentally through limiting dome height (LDH) tests in AA1050, AISI 316L and AISI 304L. FLCs were also simulated through FE (finite element) analysis. Simulations involved both constant and varying (with strain and strain path) material properties — namely, strain hardening exponent (n) and normal anisotropy (\(\bar r\)).Varying n values were estimated from limited experimental data (from tensile tests) and the implicit assumption that n scales with in-grain misorientation developments and formation of strain induced martensite. \(\bar r\), on the other hand, could be estimated from crystallographic texture only for AA1050. Simulations with varying \(\bar r\) in AA1050 had shown a clear, though numerically marginal, improvement. On the other hand, varying n could remarkably improve the FLC predictability in 316L and 304L, especially in the biaxial region.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Keeler SP (1965) Determination of forming limits in automotive stampings. Sheet Metal Industries 42:683–691
2. Goodwin GM (1968) Application of strain analysis to sheet metal forming problems in the press shop. Trans SAE 77:380–387
3. Hecker SS (1975) Simple technique for determining forming limit curves. Sheet Metal Industries 58:671–676
4. Hosford WF, Duncan JL (1999) Sheet metal forming: A review. Journal of Metals 51:39–44
5. Lu ZH, Lee D (1987) Prediction of history-dependent forming limits by applying different hardening models. Int J Mech Sci 29:123–13710.1016/0020-7403(87)90047-6 ↗
6. Nakamachi E (1995) Sheet-forming process characterization by static-explicit anisotropic elastic-plastic finite-element simulation. J Mat Proc Tech 50:116–13210.1016/0924-0136(94)01374-A ↗
7. Yoshida T, Kayayama T, Usuda M (1995) Forming-limit analysis of hemispherical-punch stretching using the three-dimensional finite-element method. J Mat Proc Tech 50:226–23710.1016/0924-0136(94)01383-C ↗
8. Takuda H, Mori K, Takakura N, Yamaguchi K (2000) Finite element analysis of limit strains in biaxial stretching of sheet metals allowing for ductile fracture. Int J Mech Sci 42:785–79810.1016/S0020-7403(99)00018-1 ↗
9. Tourki Z, Zeghloul A, Ferron G (1996) Sheet metal forming simulations using a new model for orthotropic plasticity. Comp Mater Sci 5:255–26210.1016/0927-0256(95)00076-3 ↗
10. Uthaisangsuk V, Prahl U, Munstermann S, Bleck W (2008) Experimental and numerical failure criterion for formability prediction in sheet metal forming. Comp Mater Sci 43:43–5010.1016/j.commatsci.2007.07.036 ↗
11. Shena W, Penga LH, Tang CY (2005) An anisotropic damage-based plastic yield criterion and its application to analysis of metal forming process. Int J Mech Sci 47:1897–192210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.07.007 ↗
12. Wang L, Lee TC (2006) The effect of yield criteria on the forming limit curve prediction and the deep drawing process simulation. Int J Machine Tools & Manuf 46:988–99510.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.07.050 ↗
13. Cao J, Yao H, Karallis A, Boyce MC (2000) A predictive tool for delaying wrinkling and tearing failure in sheet. Int. J Plasticity 16:1105–112910.1016/S0749-6419(99)00091-1 ↗
14. Noori H, Mahmudi R (2007) Prediction of forming limit diagrams in sheet metals using different yield criteria. Metall Mater Trans A 38:2040–205210.1007/s11661-007-9239-x ↗
15. Stoughton TB, Zhu X (2004) Review of theoretical models of the strain-based FLD and their relevance to the stress-based FLD. Int J Plasticity 20:1463–148610.1016/j.ijplas.2003.11.004 ↗
16. Hill R (1948) A theory of yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc Roy Soc London A 193:281–29710.1098/rspa.1948.0045 ↗
17. Woodthorpe J, Pearce R (1970) The anomalous behavior of aluminum sheet under balanced biaxial tension. Int J Mech Sci 12:341–34710.1016/0020-7403(70)90087-1 ↗
18. Cazacu O, Barlat F (2003) Application of representation theory to describe yielding of anisotropic aluminum alloys. Int J Engg Sci 41:1367–138510.1016/S0020-7225(03)00037-5 ↗
19. Karafillis AP, Boyce MC (1993) A general anisotropic yield criterion using bounds and a transformation weighting tensor. J Mechanics and Physics of Solids 41:1859–188610.1016/0022-5096(93)90073-O ↗
20. Barlat F, Brem JC, Yoon JW, Chung K, Dick RE, Lege DJ, Pourboghrat F, Choi SH, Chu E (2003) Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets. Int J Plasticity 19:1297–131910.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-0 ↗
21. Banabic D, Bunge HJ, Pohlandt K, Tekkaya AE (2000) Plastic anisotropy formability test forming limits. Formability of Metallic Materials (Editor: Banabic D) Springer Verlag, Berlin
22. Tseng AA (1990) Material characterization and finite element simulation for forming miniature metal parts. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 6:251–26510.1016/0168-874X(90)90031-9 ↗
23. Zhibing Z, Yuqi L, Ting D, Zhigang L (2008) Blank design and formability prediction of complicated progressive die stamping part using a multi-step unfolding method. J Mat Proc Tech 205:425–43110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.236 ↗
24. Wagener HW (1997) New developments in sheet metal. forming: sheet materials, tools and machinery. J Mat Proc Tech 72:342–357
25. Hecker SS (1974) A Cup test for assessing stretchability. Mech Eng Quart 14:30–36
26. Chu CC (1984) A Three-dimensional model of anisotropic hardening in metals. J Mech Phys Solids 32:197–21210.1016/0022-5096(84)90008-5 ↗
27. Sing WM, Rao KP (1995) Influence of material properties on sheet metal formability limits. J Mat Proc Tech 48:35–4110.1016/0924-0136(94)01630-J ↗
28. Toth LS, Hirsch J, Van Houtte P (1996) On the role of texture development in the forming limits of sheet metals. Int J Mech Sci 38:1117–112610.1016/0020-7403(95)00110-7 ↗
29. Kumar DR (2002) Formability analysis of extra-deep drawing steel. J Mat Proc Tech 130–131:31–4110.1016/S0924-0136(02)00789-6 ↗
30. Banabic D, Comsa S, Jurco P, Cosovici G, Paraianu L, Julean D (2004) FLD theoretical model using a new anisotropic yield criterion. J Mat Proc Tech 157–158:23–2710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.09.015 ↗
31. Tourki Z, Bargui H, Sidhom H (2005) The kinetic of induced martensitic formation and its effect on forming limit curves in the AISI 304 stainless steel. J Mat Proc Tech 166:330–33610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.08.010 ↗
32. Abedrabbo N, Pourboghrat F, Carsley J (2007) Forming of AA5182-O and AA5754-O at elevated temperatures using coupled thermo-mechanical finite element models. Int J Plasticity 23:841–87510.1016/j.ijplas.2006.10.005 ↗
33. Sevillano JG, Van-Houtte P, Aernoudt E (1980) Large strain work hardening and textures. Prog Mater Sci 25:69–11210.1016/0079-6425(80)90001-8 ↗
34. Mishra SK, Narasimhan K, Samajdar I (2007) Deformation twinning in AISI 316L austenitic stainless steel - Role of strain and strain path. Mater Sci Tech 23:1118–112610.1179/174328407X213242 ↗
35. Hecker SS, Stout MG, Staudhammer KP, Smith JL (1982) Effects of strain state and strain rate on deformation-induced transformation in 304 stainless steel—1. Magnetic measurements and mechanical behavior. Metall Trans A 13:619–62610.1007/BF02644427 ↗
36. Perdahcıoglu ES, Geijselaers JGM, Huetink J (2008) Influence of stress state and strain path on deformation induced martensitic transformations. Mater Sci Engg A 481–482:727–73110.1016/j.msea.2007.02.153 ↗
37. Wasnik DN, Gopalkrishnan IK, Yakhami JV, Kain V, Samajdar I (2003) Cold rolled texture and microstructure in types 304 and 316L austenitic stainless steels. Iron and steel Institute of Japan International 43:1581–158910.2355/isijinternational.43.1581 ↗
38. Wasnik DN, Kain V, Samajdar I, Verlinden B, De PK (2003) Resistance to sensitization and intergranular corrosion through extreme randomization of grain boundaries. Acta Mater 49:4587–4601
39. Barlat F, Lege DJ, Brem JC (1991) A six-component yield function for anisotropic materials. Int. J. Plast. 7:693–71210.1016/0749-6419(91)90052-Z ↗
40. Van-Houtte P (1995) MTM-FHM Software Manual. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
41. Bunge HJ (1982) Texture Analysis in Materials Science. Butterworth, London (1982)
42. Van Houtte P (1987) Calculation of Yield Locus of Textured Polycrystals using the Taylor and the relaxed Taylor Theory. Textures and Microstructures 7:29–7210.1155/TSM.7.29 ↗
43. Yerra SK, Verlinden B, Van-Houtte P (2005) On crystallographic texture of as-drawn doped-W wires. Mater Sci Forum 495–497:913–91810.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.495-497.913 ↗
44. Geroult E (1999) Bainitic transformation in TRIP- Assisted steels and its influence on mechanical properties. Ph. D Thesis. Department MTM, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
45. Samajdar I, Doherty RD (1998) Cube recrystallization texture in warm deformed aluminum. Acta Mater 46:3145–3158 Z10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00492-8 ↗
46. Marciniak Z, Kuczynski K (1967) Limit strain in the processes of stretch forming sheet metal. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 9:60910.1016/0020-7403(67)90066-5 ↗
47. Nandedkar VM, Narasimhan K (1999) Measurement of strain history during the stretching of forming-grade steel sheets. J Mater Proc Tech 89–90:24–2910.1016/S0924-0136(99)00074-6 ↗
48. Kumar S, Date PP, Narasimhan K (1994) A new criterion to predict necking failure under biaxial stretching. J Mater Proc Tech 45:583–58810.1016/0924-0136(94)90402-2 ↗
49. Verlinden B, Driver J, Samajdar I, Doherty RD (2007) Thermo-Mechanical Processing of Metallic Materials, ISBN-978-0-08-044497-0, Pergamon Materials Series - series. Cahn RW (ed). Elsevier, Amsterdam