journal article·2019-09Open access

Enabling sheet hydroforming to produce smaller radii on aerospace nickel alloys

Colin Bell, Caleb Dixon, Bob Blood, Jonathan Corney, David Savings, Ellen Jump, Nicola Zuelli

Abstract

This paper presents the first academic study of a hydroforming process known as edging. An edging process allows a smaller radius to be produced with a lower pressure than a standard sheet hydroforming process and is currently developed by trial and error that relies heavily on operator experience. This paper reports the first systematic investigation of the edging process that concludes in a new analytical model which can be used to enable the design of edging processes. It was found that in each of the three aerospace nickel alloys tested, the edging technique was effective in sharpening the flange radius from 10 mm to 4 mm or from 6 mm to 2 mm in thicknesses of 2.1 mm and 1.2 mm respectively. This radius is equivalent to between 1.5 and 1.8 times the material thickness (1.5 t to 1.8 t). These results were achieved by using edging heights of between 2.5 to 5 mm (2.5 t to 3 t). At the limits of successful edging operations, (under 2 t) three different kinds of phenomena were observed: crushing of the top of the component, radii which were pushed inwards, and the generation of an underside lip which protruded from the bottom of the samples. This paper discusses the benefits of hydroforming with an edging operation, explores the limitations of the edging process, derives an equation which can be used to estimate the sharpness of an edged radius and finally defines a model which enables the design of an edging operation. The work reported here is particularly relevant to aerospace applications because it will enable lighter components to be formed with lower pressures with nickel based superalloys.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Tolazzi M (2010) Hydroforming applications in automotive: a review. Int J Mater Form 3(S1):307–31010.1007/s12289-010-0768-2 ↗
2. Bell C, Corney J, Savings D, Storr J (2015) Assessing the potential benefits of manufacturing gas turbine components by utilizing hydroforming technology. In 13th International Cold Forming Congress; 2nd - 4th September 2015, Glasgow
3. Zhang S, Wang Z, Xu Y, Wang Z, Zhou L (2004) Recent developments in sheet hydroforming technology. J Mater Process Technol 151(1-3):237–24110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.054 ↗
4. Bell C, Tamimi S, Corney J, Savings D (2016) Research directions in hydroforming technology. In AIP Conference Proceedings Vol. 1769. No. 1. AIP Publishing, Nantes10.1063/1.4963625 ↗
5. Koç M (2008) Hydroforming for advanced manufacturing, 1st edn. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge10.1201/9781439832998 ↗
6. GOM Optical Measuring Techniques (2009) Material properties: determination of process limitations in sheet metal forming - forming limit diagram. GOM Optical Measuring Techniques
7. Paul SK (2013) Theoretical analysis of strain-and stress-based forming limit diagrams. J Strain Anal Eng Des 48(3):177–18810.1177/0309324712468524 ↗
8. Bell C, Jump E, Kerr W, Corney J, Zuelli N, Savings D (2017) Correlation between von Mises strain and material thinning in a hydroformed sample of Ti35A aerospace grade titanium. In AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1896, no. 1, p. 020029, Dublin10.1063/1.5007986 ↗
9. Herbertz R, Hermanns H, Labs R (2013) Massivumformung kurz und bündig. Deutsche Massivumformung. Hagen : Industrieverb. Massivumformung, Frankfurt
10. NeoNickel Alloy C263 Technical Data Sheet. [Online]. Available: https://www.neonickel.com/generate-alloy-pdf/?id=114 . [Accessed 12 07 2018]
11. Special Metals Special Metals INCONEL Alloy 178. [Online]. Available: http://www.specialmetals.com/assets/smc/documents/inconel_alloy_718.pdf . [Accessed 12 7 2018]
12. Special Metals Special Metals. NIMONIC alloy 75. [Online]. Available: http://www.specialmetalswiggin.co.uk/pdfs/products/NIMONIC%20alloy%2075.pdf . [Accessed 12 7 2018]
13. Nakamura S, Sugiura H, Onoe H, Ikemoto K (1994) Hydromechanical drawing of automotive parts. J Mater Process Technol 46:431–50310.1016/0924-0136(94)90129-5 ↗
14. Kobayashi S, Oh S-I, Altan T (1989) Metal forming and the finite-element method. Oxford University Press on Demand10.1093/oso/9780195044027.001.0001 ↗
15. Crapps J, Marin E, Horstemeyer M, Yassar R, Wang P (2010) Internal state variable plasticity-damage modeling of the copper tee-shaped tube hydroforming process. J Mater Process Technol 210(13):1726–1737, 201010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.06.003 ↗
16. Ceretti E, Braga D, Giardini C (2010) Optimization of process parameters and part geometry for high diameter tube hydroforming. Int J Mater Form 3(S1):271–27410.1007/s12289-010-0759-3 ↗
17. Danckert J, Nielsen KB (2000) Hydromechanical deep drawing with uniform pressure on the flange. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 1(49):217–22010.1016/S0007-8506(07)62932-1 ↗
18. Wang H, Gao L, Chem M (2011) Hydrodynamic deep drawing process assisted by radial pressure with inward flowing liquid. Int J Mech Sci 53(9):793–79910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2011.07.002 ↗
19. Shang H, Qin S, Tay C (1997) Hydroforming sheet metal with intermittent changes in the draw-in condition of the flange. J Mater Process Technol 63(1–3):72–7610.1016/S0924-0136(96)02602-7 ↗
20. Aissa S, Mohamed S, Tarek L (2017) Experimental study of steam hydroforming of aluminum sheet metal. Exp Tech 41(5):525–53310.1007/s40799-017-0191-4 ↗
21. Yuan S, Tang Z, Liu G (2013) Simulation and experiment on warm hydroforming of az31 magnesium alloy tube. In International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference collocated with the 41st North American Manufacturing Research Conference ASME10.1115/MSEC2013-1084 ↗
22. Landgrebe D, Schieck F (2015) Hot gas forming for advanced tubular automobile components: opportunities and challenges. In ASME 2015 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, Charlotte10.1115/MSEC2015-9204 ↗
23. Liu W, Xu Y, Yuan S (2014) Effect of pre-bulging on wrinkling of curved surface part by hydromechanical deep drawing. In 11th International Conference on Technology of Plasticity, Nagoya10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.117 ↗
24. Bach Fr-W, Kleiner M, Tekkaya AE (2013) Investigation of the Complex Interactions during Impulse Forming of Tubular Parts. Process Machine Interactions. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013. 491–511.
25. Rösel S, Merklein M (2014) Improving formability due to an enhancement of sealing limits caused by using a smart fluid as active fluid medium for hydroforming. Production Engineering 8 1-2(8):7–1510.1007/s11740-013-0496-9 ↗
26. Wang Z-j, Xiang N, Wang P-y, Li Z-x (2017) Property-adjustable forming medium induced extension of sheet metal formability under variable magnetic field. J Mater Process Technol 243:420–43210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.01.002 ↗
27. Mohamed M, Carty D, Storr J, Zuelli N, Blackwell P, Savings D (2016) Feasibility study of complex sheet hydroforming process:experimental and Modelling. Key Eng Mater 716:685–69110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.716.685 ↗