Shrinkage porosity prediction empowered by physics-based and data-driven hybrid models
Source abstract
Abstract
Several defects might affect a casting part and degrade its quality and the process efficiency. Porosity formation is one ofthe major defects that can appear in the resulting product. Thus, several research studies aimed at investigating methods thatminimize this anomaly. In the present work, a porosity prediction procedure is proposed to assist users at optimizing porositydistribution according to their application. This method is based on a supervised learning approach to predict shrinkageporosity from thermal history. Learning data are generated by a casting simulation software operating for different processparameters. Machine learning was coupled with a modal representation to interpolate thermal history time series for newparameters combinations. By comparing the predicted values of local porosity to the simulated results, it was demonstratedthat the proposed model is efficient and can open perspectives in the casting process optimization.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Couper MJ, Neeson AE, Griffiths JR (1990) Casting defects and the fatigue behaviour of an aluminium casting alloy. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 13(3):213–22710.1111/j.1460-2695.1990.tb00594.x ↗
2. Pequet C, Rappaz M, Gremaud M (2002) Modeling of microporosity, macroporosity, and pipe-shrinkage formation during the solidification of alloys using a mushy-zone refinement method: Applications to Aluminum Alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 33(7):2095–210610.1007/s11661-002-0041-5 ↗
3. Dash M, Makhlouf M (2001) Effect of key alloying elements on the feeding characteristics of aluminum-silicon casting alloys. J Light Met 1:251–26510.1016/S1471-5317(02)00002-0 ↗
4. Tsoukalas VD (2008) Optimization of porosity formation in AlSi9cu3 pressure die castings using genetic algorithm analysis. Mater Des 29(10):2027–203310.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.016 ↗
5. Hsu Q-C, Do AT (2013) Minimum porosity formation in pressure die casting by Taguchi method. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2013. Publisher: Hindawi, e92086510.1155/2013/920865 ↗
6. Anijdan SHM, Bahrami A, Hosseini HRM, Shafyei A (2006) Using genetic algorithm and artificial neural network analyses to design an al-si casting alloy of minimum porosity. Mater Des 27(7):605–60910.1016/j.matdes.2004.11.027 ↗
7. Gong X-D, Liao D-M, Chen T, Zhou J-X, Yin Y-J (2016) Optimization of steel casting feeding system based on BP neural network and genetic algorithm. China Foundry 13(3):182–19010.1007/s41230-016-6008-8 ↗
8. Golub GH, Reinsch C (1970) Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions. Numer Math 14(5):403–42010.1007/BF02163027 ↗
9. Sigworth GK, Wang C (1993) Mechanisms of porosity formation during solidification: A theoretical analysis. Metall Trans B 24(2):349–36410.1007/BF02659138 ↗
10. Geurts P, Ernst D, Wehenkel L (2006) Extremely randomized trees. Mach Learn 63(1):3–4210.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 ↗
11. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5–3210.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
12. Yang X, Tang K, Yao X (2009) The minimum redundancy – maximum relevance approach to building sparse support vector machines. 184–19010.1007/978-3-642-04394-9_23 ↗