Addressing discontinuity in finite element - control volume based liquid injection moulding simulations using neural network surrogates
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Optimisation and machine learning techniques are increasingly used with net-shape composites forming methods like resin transfer moulding (RTM) for process monitoring, control, and defect detection. However, the standard finite element-control volume modelling approach used in these simulations is discontinuous with respect to model parameters and time. We demonstrate that the use of a neural network surrogate, designed with smooth activation layers, can approximate these models, while eliminating any nonsmooth or discontinuous behaviour. To illustrate the benefits of this method, we use Bayesian inference to predict permeability and race tracking strengths from pressure measurements, where the neural network prevents discontinuities from propagating to the posterior, forming smooth posterior distributions that incorporate the model approximation error.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Machine Learning in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Advani SG, Sozer M (2003) Process modeling in composites manufacturing. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/978020391006110.1201/9780203910061 ↗
2. Agogué R et al (2023) Analysis and minimization of race tracking in the resintransfer-molding process by Monte Carlo simulation. Materials 16(12). ISSN: 1996-1944. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/16/12/443810.3390/ma16124438 ↗
3. Babaniyi O et al (2021) Inferring the basal sliding coefficient field for the stokes ice sheet model under rheological uncertainty. Cryosphere 15(4):1731–175010.5194/tc-15-1731-2021 ↗
4. Becker R, Vexler B (2003) A posteriori estimation for finite element discretization of paramter identification problems. Numerische Mathematik 96:435–459. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00211-003-0482-910.1007/s00211-003-0482-9 ↗
5. Bickerton S et al (2000) Experimental analysis and numerical modeling of flow channel effects in resin transfer molding. Polym Compos 21(1):134–15310.1002/pc.10172 ↗
6. Bickerton S, Advani SG (1999) Characterization and modeling of race-tracking in liquidcomposite molding processes. Compos Sci Technol 59(15):2215–2229. ISSN: 0266-3538. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00077-9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026635389900077910.1016/S0266-3538(99)00077-9 ↗
7. Bishop CM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, New York, NY. ISBN: 978-0-387-31073-2
8. Bruschke MV, Advani SG (1990) A finite element/control volume approach to mold filling in anisotropic porous media. Polym Compos 11(6):398–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.750110613. https://4spepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pc.75011061310.1002/pc.750110613 ↗
9. Caglar B et al (2018) In-plane permeability distribution mapping of isotropic mats using flow front detection. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 113:275–286. ISSN: 1359-835X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.07.036. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359835X1830306310.1016/j.compositesa.2018.07.036 ↗
10. Castello DA, Kaipio JP (2019) Modeling errors due to timoshenko approximation in damage identification. Int J Numer Meth Eng 120(9):1148–116210.1002/nme.6175 ↗
11. Causon M et al (2024) Real-time Bayesian inversion in resin transfer moulding using neural surrogates. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 185:108355. ISSN: 1359-835X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108355. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359835X2400352X10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108355 ↗
12. Chiu P-H et al (2022) CAN-PINN: a fast physics-informed neural network based on coupled-automatic-numerical differentiation method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 395:114909. ISSN: 0045-7825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.114909. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004578252200190610.1016/j.cma.2022.114909 ↗
13. Crawford B et al (2020) A bayesian belief approach to quality control of resin transfer molding process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05715-x10.1007/s00170-020-05715-x ↗
14. de Almeida SFM, Santos Nogueira Neto Zdos (1994) Effect of void content on the strength of composite laminates. Compos Struct 28(2):139–148. ISSN: 0263-8223. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(94)90044-2. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/026382239490044210.1016/0263-8223(94)90044-2 ↗
15. Devillard M, Hsiao K-T, Advani SG (2005) Flow sensing and control strategies to address race-tracking disturbances in resin transfer molding—part II: automation and validation. Compos A App Sci Manuf 36(11):1581–1589. ISSN: 1359-835X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.04.009. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359835X0500075810.1016/j.compositesa.2004.04.009 ↗
16. Devillard M et al (2003) On-line characterization of bulk permeability and racetracking during the filling stage in resin transfer molding process. J Compos Mater 37(17):1525–154110.1177/0021998303034459 ↗
17. Fernández-León J et al (2022) A machine learning strategy for race-tracking detection during manufacturing of composites by liquid moulding. Integrating Mater Manuf Innov 11:296–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-022-00263-610.1007/s40192-022-00263-6 ↗
18. Gelman A et al (2013) Bayesian data analysis, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL. ISBN: 978-1-4398-4095-5. https://stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/book/
19. Gokce A, Hsiao K-T, Advani SG (2002) Branch and bound search to optimize injection gate locations in liquid composite molding processes. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 33(9):1263–1272. ISSN: 1359-835X. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00047-7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359835X0200047710.1016/S1359-835X(02)00047-7 ↗
20. Hsiao K-T, Advani SG (2004) Flow sensing and control strategies to address race-tracking disturbances in resin transfer molding. Part I: design and algorithm development. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 35(10):1149–1159. ISSN: 1359-835X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.03.010. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359835X0400076410.1016/j.compositesa.2004.03.010 ↗
21. Iglesias M, Park M, Tretyakov MV (2018) Bayesian inversion in resin transfer molding. Inverse Prob 34(10):105002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/aad1cc10.1088/1361-6420/aad1cc ↗
22. Kaipio JP, Somersalo E (2005) Statistical and computational inverse problems. Springer New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/b13865910.1007/b138659 ↗
23. Jiang W et al (2019) Voids formation and their effects on mechanical properties in thermoformed carbon fiber fabric-reinforced composites. Polym Compos 40(S2):E1094–E1102. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.24876. https://4spepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/pc.24876. https://4spepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pc.2487610.1002/pc.24876 ↗
24. Kaipio J, Kolehmainen V (2013) 64432 Approximate marginalization over modelling errors and uncertainties in inverse problems. In: Bayesian theory and applications. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199695607. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695607.003.0032. https://academic.oup.com/book/0/chapter/161414792/chapter-ag-pdf/44918479/book_12043_section_161414792.ag.pdf10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695607.003.0032 ↗
25. Kaipio J, Somersalo E (2007) Statistical inverse problems: discretization, model reduction and inverse crimes. J Comput Appl Math 198(2):493–50410.1016/j.cam.2005.09.027 ↗
26. Kang M, Jung J, Lee WI (2000) Analysis of resin transfer moulding process with controlled multiple gates resin injection. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 31:407–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00086-X10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00086-X ↗
27. Kumar A, Shukla M (2014) Race tracking and related issues in liquid composite moulding process. J Manuf Sci Product 14(4):209–217. https://doi.org/10.1515/jmsp-2014-001410.1515/jmsp-2014-0014 ↗
28. Lawrence JM et al (2004) Characterization of preform permeability in the presence of race tracking. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 35(12):1393–140510.1016/j.compositesa.2004.05.002 ↗
29. Lee L, Young W, Lin R (1994) Mold filling and cure modeling of RTM and SRIM processes. Compos Struct 27(1): 109–120. Special Issue Advances in Fiber Reinforced Composites Technology. ISSN: 0263-8223. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(94)90072-8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/026382239490072810.1016/0263-8223(94)90072-8 ↗
30. Matveev M et al (2021) Bayesian inversion algorithm for estimating local variations in permeability and porosity of reinforcements using experimental data. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 143:106323. ISSN: 1359-835X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106323. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359835X2100049X10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106323 ↗
31. Mehdikhani M et al (2019) Voids in fiber-reinforced polymer composites: a review on their formation, characteristics, and effects on mechanical performance. J Compos Mater 53(12):1579–1669. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831877215210.1177/0021998318772152 ↗
32. Mendikute J et al (2021) Impregnation quality diagnosis in resin transfer moulding by machine learning. Compos B Eng 221:108973. ISSN: 1359-8368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108973. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135983682100360710.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108973 ↗
33. Nedanov PB, Advani SG (2002) Numerical computation of the fiber preform permeability tensor by the homogenization method. English. Polymer Compos 23(5):758. Copyright - Copyright Society of Plastics Engineers Oct 2002; Last updated - 2023-07-27; CODEN - PCOMDI. https://ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/numerical-computation-fiber-preform-permeability/docview/199136534/se-210.1002/pc.10474 ↗
34. Nicholson R et al (2023) On global normal linear approximations for nonlinear bayesian inverse problems. Inverse Prob 39(5):05400110.1088/1361-6420/acc129 ↗
35. O’Leary-Roseberry T et al (2023) Derivative-informed neural operator: an efficient framework for high-dimensional parametric derivative learning. arXiv:2206.10745. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.1074510.1016/j.jcp.2023.112555 ↗
36. Pillai KM, Advani SG (1998) Numerical simulation of unsaturated flow in woven fiber preforms during the resin transfer molding process. Polym Compos 19(1):71–8010.1002/pc.10077 ↗
37. Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis G (2019) Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J Comput Phys 378:686–707. ISSN: 0021-9991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002199911830712510.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
38. Rodriguez S et al (2023) Hybrid twin of rtm process at the scarce data limit. Int J Mater Form 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-023-01747-210.1007/s12289-023-01747-2 ↗
39. Roy C (2010) Review of discretization error estimators in scientific computing. In: 48th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-126. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2010-126. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2010-12610.2514/6.2010-126 ↗
40. Schmidt H et al (2009) Discretization error when using finite element models: analysis and evaluation of an underestimated problem. J Biomech 42(12):1926–1934. ISSN: 0021-9290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.05.005. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002192900900282610.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.05.005 ↗
41. Scott W (1994) Errors due to spatial discretization and numerical precision in the finite-element method. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 42(11):1565–1570. https://doi.org/10.1109/8.36277710.1109/8.362777 ↗
42. Simacek P, Advani SG, Binetruy C (2004) Liquid injection molding simulation (lims) a comprehensive tool to design, optimize and control the filling process in liquid composite molding. JEC-Compos 8:58–61
43. Simacek P, Advani SG (2004) Desirable features in mold filling simulations for liquid composite molding processes. Polym Compos 25(4):355–36710.1002/pc.20029 ↗
44. Wang Y et al (2024) Application of machine learning for composite moulding process modelling. Compos Commun 48:101960. ISSN: 2452- 2139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2024.101960. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245221392400151710.1016/j.coco.2024.101960 ↗
45. Wright N et al (2023) Bayesian optimal experimental design for race tracking in resin transfer moulding. Appl Sci 13(20). ISSN: 2076-3417. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132011606. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/20/1160610.3390/app132011606 ↗
46. Yu J et al (2022) Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 393:114823. ISSN: 0045-7825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.114823. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004578252200143810.1016/j.cma.2022.114823 ↗