A new criterion for preform design of H-shaped hot die forging based on shape complexity factor
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, a new criterion is proposed in order to determine the necessity of preform steps for axisymmetric H-shaped parts in multi-stage hot forging based on shape complexity factor. The proposed geometrical based criterion was implemented in several examples using finite element method and experimental tests to verify the presented criterion. Finally, in comparison with the existing criteria, results show that the proposed criterion is in excellent agreement with experimental results in order to estimate the optimum number of preform steps.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Altan T, Ngaile G, Shen G (2004) Cold and hot forging fundamentals and application. ASM International Press10.31399/asm.tb.chffa.9781627083003 ↗
2. Lee SR, Lee YK, Park CH, Yang DY (2002) A new method of preform design in hot forging by using electric field theory. Int J Mech Sci 44:773–792. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7403(02)00003-610.1016/S0020-7403(02)00003-6 ↗
3. Biglari FR, O’Dowd NP, Fenner RT (1998) Optimum design of forging dies using fuzzy logic in conjunction with the backward deformation method. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 38:981–1000. doi: 10.1016/S0890-6955(97)00026-610.1016/S0890-6955(97)00026-6 ↗
4. Park JJ, Rebelo N, Kobayashi S (1983) A new approach to preform design in metal forming with the finite element method. Int J Mach Tool D R 23(1):71–79. doi: 10.1016/0020-7357(83)90008-210.1016/0020-7357(83)90008-2 ↗
5. Badrinarayanan S, Zabaras N, Constantinescu A (1995) Preform design in metal forming. In: Shen SF, Dawson PR (eds) Proceeding of the 5th international conference on numerical methods in industrial forming process. Balkema AA, Rotterdam, pp 533–538
6. Brukhanov A, Rebelsky A (1962) Hot closed die forging- designing and calculation of dies. Gntiml, Moscow
7. Chamouard A (1964) Eslampage et forge. Dound, Paris
8. Thomas GB (1980) Forging handbook, vol 2. Die Design, DFRA Manual
9. Tomov B (1999) A new shape complexity factor. J Mater Process Technol 92-93:439–443. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00167-310.1016/S0924-0136(99)00167-3 ↗
10. Tomov B, Radev R (2004) An example of determination of preforming steps in hot die forging. J Mater Process Technol 157–158:617–619. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.07.12310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.07.123 ↗
11. Tomov B, Radev R (2010) Shape complexity factor for closed die forging. Int J Mater Form 3:319–322. doi: 10.1007/s12289-010-0771-710.1007/s12289-010-0771-7 ↗
12. Zhao G, Wright E, Grandhi RV (1995) Forging preform design with shape complexity control in simulating backward deformation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 35:1225–1239. doi: 10.1016/0890-6955(94)00117-310.1016/0890-6955(94)00117-3 ↗
13. Schey JA (2000) Introduction to manufacturing processes, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
14. Teterin GP, Tarnovsky IJ, Chechik AA (1966) Criterion of complexity of the configuration of forgings. Kuznechno-Shtanmpovochnoe Proizvodstvo 7:6–8
15. Kienzle O, Spies K (1957) The design of the intermediate steps for forging. Werkstattstechnik und Maschinenbau 47:175–181
16. Hosseini-Ara R, Poursina M, Golastanian H (2007) A new definition of shape complexity factor in forging. AIP Conference Proceedings 907(1):487–492. doi: 10.1063/1.272956010.1063/1.2729560 ↗
17. Chu E, Im YT, Kim N, Lee J (1995) Process sequence design of large axisymmetric forging product. AISI 4130 in nozzle type. J Mater Process Technol 48(1–4):143–14910.1016/0924-0136(94)01644-G ↗
18. Kim HY, Kim JJ, Kim N (1994) Physical and numerical modeling of hot closed-die forging to reduce forging load and die wear. J Mater Process Technol 42:401–420. doi: 10.1016/0924-0136(94)90146-510.1016/0924-0136(94)90146-5 ↗
19. Misiolek WZ (1996) Material physical response in the extrusion process. J Mater Process Technol 60(1–3):117–124. doi: 10.1016/0924-0136(96)02316-310.1016/0924-0136(96)02316-3 ↗