Analytical friction force compensation of flow curves out of layer compression tests with the pin extrusion test
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract For conventional material models like Yld2000-2d or BBC05 the equi-biaxial yield strength is required for the parameter identification. In this context, a commonly used test setup is the hydraulic bulge test. However, an inaccuracy in the characterization of the initial yield strength is present in the hydraulic bulge test. Due to the evaluation of the resulting curvature of the specimen, that is nearly infinite at the onset of yielding, the calculated stress can significant vary. Another proposed test setup for the characterization of the equi-biaxial stress state is the layer compression test. Here, the onset of yielding can be characterized with sufficient accuracy. The disadvantage in this test is the friction between stack and tool that leads to an overestimation of the flow curve. Thus, robust and experimental based friction compensation should be used, to gain a comparable hardening behaviour as in the hydraulic bulge test. In this contribution, the friction in the layer compression test is compensated by characterization of the tribological conditions. Thus, the tribological system consisting of workpiece surface, tool surface and lubricant is characterized using pin extrusion tests. The friction is analysed for the two steel grades DC06 and DP600 and the aluminium AA5182. With the identified friction factors, the measured testing force in the layer compression test is reduced by the portion of friction. For verification, hydraulic bulge tests, which are approximately friction free, are performed and compared with the resulting flow curves of the layer compression tests. Results confirm, that a friction compensation of the layer compression tests lead to a significant improvement of the resulting material parameters in comparison to the hydraulic bulge tests. Additional, a new method for the friction factor characterization is presented that uses in the stress difference of flow curves characterized in hydraulic bulge tests and layer compression tests.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Hill R (1990) Constitutive modelling of orthotropic plasticity in sheet metals. J Mech Phys Solids 38(3):405–41710.1016/0022-5096(90)90006-P ↗
2. Barlat F, Lege DJ, Brehm JC (1991) A six-component yield function for anisotropic materials. Int J Plast 7(7):693–71210.1016/0749-6419(91)90052-Z ↗
3. Barlat F, Brem JC, Joon JW, Chung K, Dick RE, Lege DJ, Porboghrat F, Choi SH, Chu E (2003) Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets - part 1: theory. Int J Plast:1297–131910.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-0 ↗
4. Banabic D, Balan T, Comsa D (2000) “A new yield criterion for orthotropic sheet metals under plane-stress conditions,” The 7th Conf. “TPR2000” Cluj Napoca, pp. 217–224
5. ISO/DIS 16808:2014–11: Metallic materials – Sheet and strip – Determination of biaxial stress-strain curve by means of bulge test with optical measuring system. Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V., Berlin: Beuth, 2014.
6. N.N., ISO 16842 (2014-10-00):Metallic materials - Sheet and strip - Biaxial tensile testing method using a cruciform test piece, 2014.
7. Güner A, Brosius A, Tekkaya AE 2009 “Analysis of the hydraulic bulge test with FEA concerning the accuracy of the determined flow curves,” Key Eng Mater, pp. 439–44710.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.410-411.439 ↗
8. Panknin W (1959) Der hydraulische Tiefungsversuch und die Ermittlung von Fließkurven. Dissertation Technische Hochschule Stuttgart, Stuttgart
9. An YG, Vegter H (1998) “The difference in plastic behaviour between the bulging test and the through-thickness compression test for sheet steels and Al alloys,” Proceedings IDDRG Working Group Meeting 1998, pp. 1–5
10. Vegter H, An Y (2008) “Mechanical testing for modeling of the material behaviour in forming simulations,” Proceedings of the Numisheet Conference 2008, pp. 55–60
11. An Y, Vegter H (2005) Analytical and experimental study of frictional behavior in through-thickness compression test. J Mater Process Technol 160:148–15510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.05.026 ↗
12. An Y, Vegter H (1999) “Experimental study of the friction behavior in the compression test,” Proceedings of the IDDRG Conference 1999, pp. 1–6
13. Eder M, Gaber C, Nester W, Hoffmann H, Volk W (2018) Innovative measurement technique to determine equibiaxial curves of sheet metals using a modified Nakajima test. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 67:265–26810.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.094 ↗
14. Hochholdinger B, Grass H, Lipp A, Hora P (2009) “Determination of Flow Curves by Stack Compression Tests and Inverse Analysis for the Simulation of Hot Forming,” Proceedings 7th European LS-DYNA Conference, pp. 1–11
15. Alves LM, Nielsen CV, Martins P (2011) Revisiting the fundamentals and capabilities of the stack compression test. Exp Mech 51:1565–157210.1007/s11340-011-9480-5 ↗
16. Shaw MC, Ber A, Mamin PA (1960) Friction Characteristics of Sliding Surfaces Undergoing Subsurface Plastic Flow. J Basic Eng 82:342–34610.1115/1.3662595 ↗
17. Ebrahimi R, Najafizadeh A (2004) A new method for evaluation of friction in bulk metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 152:136–14310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.03.029 ↗
18. Schrader T, Shirgaokar M, Altan T (2007) A critical evaluation of the double cup extrusion test for selection of cold forging lubricants. J Mater Process Technol:36–4410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.229 ↗
19. Vierzigmann U (2016) Beitrag zur Untersuchung der tribologischen Bedingungen in der Blechmassivumformung - Bereitstellung von tribologischen Modellversuchen und Realisierung von Tailored Surfaces, vol. 288, Meisenbach GmbH Verlag
20. Male AT, Cockroft MG (1964) A Method for the Determination of the Coefficient of Friction of MEtals under Conditions of Bulk Plastic Deformation. J Inst Met 93:38–46
21. Hörlacher U (1989) Prüfung von Schmierstoffadditiven auf das Tribosystem bei der Kaltmassivumformung, vol. 104, B. A. D. I. f. Umformtechnik, Ed., Berlin: Springer10.1007/978-3-642-84097-5 ↗
22. Rajesh E, SivaPrakash M (2013) Analysis of friction factor by employing the ring compression test under different lubricants. Int J Sci Eng 4(5):1163–1171
23. Sofuoglu H, Gedikli H (2002) Determination of friction coefficient encountered in large deformation processes. Tribol Int 35:27–3410.1016/S0301-679X(01)00076-7 ↗
24. N.N., “DIN 50106 - Prüfung metallischer Werkstoffe – Druckversuch bei Raumtemperatur DIN 50106:2016–11,” Beuth, Berlin, 2016.
25. Merklein M, Kuppert A (2009) A method for the layer compression test considering the anisotropic material behavior. Int J Mater Form 2:483–48310.1007/s12289-009-0592-8 ↗
26. Hesse B, Sonne HM, Rohiller G (1991) Zuverlässige Dehngrenzen im rechnergesteuerten. Materialprüfung:208–21110.1515/mt-1991-337-810 ↗
27. Suttner S, Merklein M (2016) Experimental and numerical investigation of a strain rate controlled hydraulic bulge test of sheet metal. J Mater Process Technol:121–13310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.04.022 ↗
28. Min J, Stoughton TB, Carsley JE, Carlson BE, Lin J, Gao X (2017) Accurate characterization of biaxial stress-strain response of sheet metal from bulge testing. Int J Plast:192–21310.1016/j.ijplas.2016.02.005 ↗
29. Burgdorf M (1966) Untersuchungen über das Stauchen und Zapfenpressen, vol. 5, B. A. D. I. f. Umformtechnik, Ed., Essen: Girardet
30. DIN 8582: Manufacturing processes forming Classification, subdivision, terms and definitions, alphabetical index, Berlin: Beuth Verlag GmbH, 2003.
31. Kraus M, Andreas K, Stellin T, Engel U, Merklein M (1896) Modification of Tribological Conditions for Influencing the Material Flow in Bulk Forming of Microparts from Sheet Metal. AIP Conf Proc 1:2017
32. Picu R, Vincze G, Ozturk F, Garcio J, Barlat F, Maniatty A (2005) Strain rate sensitivity of the commercial aluminum alloy AA5182-O. Mater Sci Eng A 390:334–34310.1016/j.msea.2004.08.029 ↗
33. DIN EN ISO 4287: Geometrische Produktspezifikation (GPS) – Oberflächenbeschaffenheit: Tastschnittverfahren – Benennungen, Definitionen und Kenngrößen der Oberflächenbeschaffenheit, Berlin: Beuth Verlag GmbH, 2010.
34. DIN EN ISO 6892-1:2014: Metallische Werkstoffe - Zugversuch - Teil 1: Prüfverfahren bei Raumtemperatur (ISO/DIS 6892–1:2014); Deutsche Fassung prEN ISO 6892-1:2014. Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V., Berlin: Beuth, 2014.
35. Hockett JE, Sherby OD (1975) Large strain deformation of polycrystalline metals at low homhlogous temperatures. J Mech Phys Solids 23:87–9810.1016/0022-5096(75)90018-6 ↗
36. Merklein M, Biasutti M (2011) Forward and Reverse Simple Shear Test Experiments for Material Modelling in Forming Simulations. Steel Res Int:702–707
37. Dorn JE (1949) Stress-Strain Rate Relations for Anisotropic Plastic Flow. J Appl Phys 20:15–2010.1063/1.1698231 ↗
38. Lenzen M, Affronti E, Rosenschon M, Merklein M (2016) Investigation of the anisotropic strain rate dependency of AA5182-O and DC04 for different stress states. Adv Mater Res 1140:35–4210.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1140.35 ↗