Rheological modeling and forming process simulation of CNT nanocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the rheological modelling of untreated Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs) suspended within an epoxy resin and its application in nanocomposites forming processes. The untreated CNT suspensions exhibited significant steady shear-thinning and contained optically resolvable aggregate structures. A simple orientation model, based on a Fokker-Planck advection–diffusion description, failed to capture the experimentally observed rheological responses for untreated CNT suspensions. A new model named the “Aggregation/Orientation” (AO) model has been developed to describe the experimental findings. The model integrated elements of both a standard orientation model and aggregation modelling concepts within the Fokker-Planck formalism. However, the proposed model has different weakness; the most important concerns the affine orientation of tubes with the fluid deformation independently of the state of aggregation. This mechanism seems to be in opposition to the experimental observations. In this paper we propose an alternative rheological model that is then employed for simulating film processing by employing spin coating.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Material Mechanics · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Advani SG, Tucker CL III (1990) Closure approximations for three-dimensional structure tensors. J Rheol 34:367–38610.1122/1.550133 ↗
2. Ammar A, Mokdad B, Chinesta F, Keunings R (2006) A new family of solvers for some classes of multidimensional partial differential equations encountered in kinetic theory modelling of complex fluids. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 139:153–17610.1016/j.jnnfm.2006.07.007 ↗
3. Chinesta F, Chaidron G, Poitou A (2003) On the solution of the Fokker-Planck equation in steady recirculating flows involving short fibre suspensions. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 113:97–12510.1016/S0377-0257(03)00100-9 ↗
4. Cueto E, Ma A, Chinesta F, Mackley M (2008) Numerical simulation of spin coating processes with functionalized carbon nanotubes suspensions. Int J Mater Form 2:89–9910.1007/s12289-008-0377-5 ↗
5. Dupret F, Verleye V (1999) Modelling the flow of fibre suspensions in narrows gaps. In: Siginer DA, De Kee D, Chabra RP (eds) Advances in the flow and rheology of non-Newtonian fluids. Rheology series. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1347–139810.1016/S0169-3107(99)80020-3 ↗
6. Folgar F, Tucker CL III (1984) Orientation behaviour of fibers in concentrated suspensions. J Reinf Plast Compos 3:98–11910.1177/073168448400300201 ↗
7. Gonzalez D, Cueto E, Chinesta F, Doblare M (2007) An updated Lagrangian strategy for free-surface fluid dynamics. J Comput Phys 223:127–15010.1016/j.jcp.2006.09.002 ↗
8. Hernandez Cifre JG, ThMAOM Barenbrug, Schieber JD, van den Brule BHAA (2003) Brownian dynamics simulation of reversible polymer networks under shear using a non-interacting dumbbell model. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 113:73–9610.1016/S0377-0257(03)00063-6 ↗
9. Hobbie EK, Fry DJ (2007) Rheology of concentrated carbon nanotube suspensions. J Chem Phys 126:124907-1–124907-710.1063/1.2711176 ↗
10. Jeffery GB (1922) The motion of ellipsoidal particles immersed in a viscous fluid. Proc R Soc London A102:161–17910.1098/rspa.1922.0078 ↗
11. Kinloch IA, Roberts SA, Windle AH (2002) A rheological study of concentrated aqueous nanotube dispersions. Polymer 43:7483–749110.1016/S0032-3861(02)00664-X ↗
12. Lin-Gibson S, Pathak JA, Grulke EA, Wang H, Hobbie EK (2004) Elastic flow instability in nanotube suspensions. Phys Rev Lett 92:048302-1–048302-4
13. Ma AWK, Mackley MR, Rahatekar SS (2007) Experimental observation on the flow-induced assembly of carbon nanotube suspensions to form helical bands. Rheol Acta 46:979–98710.1007/s00397-007-0183-x ↗
14. Ma AWK, Chinesta F, Mackley MR (2008a) Rheological modelling of carbon nanotube aggregate suspensions. J Rheol 52(6):1311–133010.1122/1.2982932 ↗
15. Ma AWK, Chinesta F, Tuladhar T, Mackley MR (2008b) Filament stretching of carbon nanotube suspensions. Rheol Acta 47:447–45710.1007/s00397-007-0247-y ↗
16. Ma AWK, Mackley MR, Chinesta F (2008c) The microstructure and rheology of carbon nanotube suspensions. Int J Mater Form, published online10.1063/1.2729613 ↗
17. Ma AWK, Chinesta F, Mackley MR (2009) The rheology and modelling of chemically treated carbon nanotube suspensions. J Rheol 53(3):547–57310.1122/1.3093105 ↗
18. McNally T, Pöschke P, Halley P, Murphy M, Martin D, Bell SEJ, Brennan GP, Bein D, Lemoine P, Quinn JP (2005) Polyethylene multiwalled carbon nanotube composites. Polymer 46:8222–823210.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.094 ↗
19. Petrie CJS (1999) The rheology of fibre suspensions. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 87:369–40210.1016/S0377-0257(99)00069-5 ↗
20. Rahatekar SS, Koziol KKK, Butler SA, Elliott JA, Shaffer MSP, Mackley MR, Windle AH (2006) Viscosity enhancement of an epoxy resin matrix by addition of multi-wall carbon nanotubes. J Rheol 50:599–61010.1122/1.2221699 ↗
21. Vaccaro A, Marrucci G (2000) A model for the nonlinear rheology of associating polymers. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 92:261–27310.1016/S0377-0257(00)00095-1 ↗
22. Xu J, Chatterjee S, Koelling KW, Wang Y, Bechtel SE (2005) Shear and extensional rheology of carbon nanofiber suspensions. Rheol Acta 44:537–56210.1007/s00397-005-0436-5 ↗