Crystal plasticity prediction of Lankford coefficients using the MULTISITE model: influence of the critical resolved shear stresses
Source abstract
Abstract
The MULTISITE model [1] is based on polycrystalline plasticity and the underlying hypotheses of the model are (i) that the deformation of each grain is significantly influenced by the interaction with a limited number of adjacent grains, and (ii) that local strains deviate from their macroscopic average according to specific “relaxation modes”. The LAMEL model [2] is reformulated into the more general elastic-viscoplastic MULTISITE model permitting various relaxation modes. This model has been validated for cubic materials but hexagonal close-packed (HCP) crystals usually demonstrate larger anisotropy than cubic crystals. The model was used to simulate uniaxial tensile tests performed on rolled sheets made of Ti-6Al-4V. The Lankford coefficients (r) calculated in various directions in the plane of the sheet were analysed. In this study, different grain interaction hypotheses were tested. Besides, it appeared that the value of the critical resolved shear stresses (CRSS) of the different slip system families of the HCP metal had significant effects on the results. Their influence as well as the influence of the strain rate sensitivity parameter was examined.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (7)
Show source-provided references
1. Delannay L, Loge RE, Chastel Y, Van Houtte P (2002) Prediction of intergranular strains in cubic metals using a multisite elastic-plastic model. Acta Mater 50:5127–513810.1016/S1359-6454(02)00369-5 ↗
2. Van Houtte P, Li S, Seefeldt M, Delannay L (2005) Deformation texture prediction: from the Taylor model to the advanced Lamel model. Int J Plast 21:589–62410.1016/j.ijplas.2004.04.011 ↗
3. Phillippe MJ, Serghat M, Van Houtte P, Esling C (1995) Modelling of texture evolution for materials of hexagonal symmetry -II applications to zirconium and titanium α or near α alloys. Acta Metallurgica & Materialia 43:1619–163010.1016/0956-7151(94)00329-G ↗
4. Lütjering G, Williams JC. Titanium, Springer, Second edition
5. Mayeur JR, McDowell DL (2007) A three-dimensional crystal plasticity model for duplex Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Plast 23:1457–148510.1016/j.ijplas.2006.11.006 ↗
6. Fundenberger JJ, Philippe MJ, Wagner F, Esling C (1997) Modelling and prediction of mechanical properties for materials with hexagonal symmetry (Zinc, Titanium and Zirconium alloys). Acta Metallurgica et Materialia 45(10):4041–405510.1016/S1359-6454(97)00099-2 ↗
7. Medina JA, Sevillano PJG (1995) Two- dimensional sections of the yield locus of a Ti-6Al-4V alloy with a strong transverse type crystallographic α texture. Materials science and engineering A201:103–11010.1016/0921-5093(95)09780-5 ↗