Effect of multiwall nanotube on the properties of polypropylenes
Source abstract
Abstract
The variety of plastics is enormous; however in some cases there is no pure material to fulfill all the requirements. In these cases it is important to prepare the desired material by mixing pure polymeric materials. Different composition of carbon nanotubes and polymers were produced by a special mixing unit called Infinitely Variable Dynamic Shear Mixer (IDMX). In the experiments polypropylene and polycarbonate polymers were used as matrix materials. Nanotube masterbatches were used to prepare different compositions. Concentration series were manufactured by the dynamic mixer. The nanotube composites were granulated and test pieces were injection moulded. The prepared materials were characterised by scanning electron microscopy. Mechanical, electrical and burning properties of the materials were also determined. The order of magnitude increase of the conductivity of the composites was 8 compared to the pure polymer. The ultimate elongation decreases with increasing nanotube concentration. The composites show more rigid behaviour than the pure materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Nanotechnology research and applications · Dielectric materials and actuators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (11)
Show source-provided references
1. Min-Kang Seo, Soo-Jin Park: ‘Electrical resistivity and rheologycal behavior of carbon nanotubes-filled polypropylene composites’, Chemical Physics Letters, 395 (2004) 44–48.10.1016/j.cplett.2004.07.047 ↗
2. Changa T.E., Jensenb L.R., Kisliuka A., Pipesc R.B., Pyrzb R., Sokolov A.P., ‘Microscopic mechanism of reinforcement in single-wall carbon nanotube/polypropylene nanocomposite’, Polymer 46 (2005) 439–44410.1016/j.polymer.2004.11.030 ↗
3. Gorga R.E., Cohen R.E., J. Polym. Sci., Part B Polym. Phys., 42(14) (2004) 2690–270210.1002/polb.20126 ↗
4. Kashiwagi T., Grulke E., Hilding J., Groth K., Harris R., Butler K., Polymer, 45, (2004) 4227–4239.10.1016/j.polymer.2004.03.088 ↗
5. Zilli D., Chiliotte C., Escobar M.M., Bekeris V., Rubiolo G.R., Cukierman A.L., Polymer 46 (2005) 6090–6095.10.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.086 ↗
6. Lopez M.A., Manchado, Valentini L., Biagiotti J., Kenny J.M., ‘Thermal and mechanical properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes–polypropylene composites prepared by melt processing’ Carbon, 43 (2005) 1499–150510.1016/j.carbon.2005.01.006 ↗
7. US Patent No. 5,749,649. U.S. Patent No. 5,951.159
8. Breuer O., Sundararaj U., Polym. Compos. 25(6) (2004) 630–64510.1002/pc.20058 ↗
9. Haggenmueller R., Gommans H.H., Rinzler A.G., Fischer J.E., Winey K.I., ’Aligned single-walled carbon nanotubes in composites by melt processing, methods’, Chem. Phys. Lett. 330 (2000) 219–22510.1016/S0009-2614(00)01013-7 ↗
10. Belina K., Juhász P., Csongor D., Schott N.R., ANTEC 2001, Dallas, Technical Papers XLVII, (2001) 2240
11. Min-Kang Seo, Jae-Rock Lee, Soo-Jin Park, ‘Crystallization kinetics and interfacial behaviors of polypropylene composites reinforced with multi-walled carbon nanotubes’, Mat. Sci. and Eng., A 404 (2005) 79–8410.1016/j.msea.2005.05.065 ↗