Modeling of the temperature field in the chip and in the tool in high-speed machining of a carbon steel: effect of pearlite to austenite phase transition in AISI 1075
Source abstract
Abstract
A one-dimensional transient finite-difference model for the temperature distribution in orthogonal metal cutting, which was originally developed by Boothroyd, and then improved upon by Tlusty, is used to calculate the temperature field in the chip and in the tool in orthogonal cutting of AISI 1075 steel. In a series of compression tests using the NIST pulse-heated Kolsky bar, a phase transformation from pearlite to austenite was observed to take place within a few seconds near the eutectoid temperature (723°C) of the material. At temperatures above the transformation temperature in this material, which had been heat treated so that it had uniform pearlitic microstructure prior to testing, a large decrease in flow stress of approximately 50 % was observed. It is shown how the predicted peak temperature along the chip-tool interface on the rake face decreases when this decrease in material strength is incorporated into a Johnson-Cook constitutive response model for the material.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (10)
Show source-provided references
1. Tlusty, J.: Manufacturing Processes and Equipment. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2000.
2. Childs, T. H. C.: Material property needs in modeling metal machining. Journal of Machining Science and Technology 2(2):303–316, 1998.10.1080/10940349808945673 ↗
3. Mates, S. P.; Rhorer, R. L.; Whitenton, E. P.; Burns, T. J.; Basak, D.: A pulse-heated Kolsky bar technique for measuring flow stress of metals subjected to high loading and heating rates. Experimental Mechanics, 48:799–807, 2008.10.1007/s11340-008-9137-1 ↗
4. Jaspers, S. P. F. C.; Dautzenberg, J. H.: Material behaviour in conditions similar to metal cutting: flow stress in the primary shear zone. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 122:322–330, 2002.10.1016/S0924-0136(01)01228-6 ↗
5. Burns, T. J.; Mates, S. P.; Rhorer, R. L.; Whitenton, E. P.; Basak, D.: Dynamic properties for modeling and simulation of machining: an update of results from the NIST pulse-heated Kolsky bar. In: 12th CIRP Conference on Modelling of Machining Operations, 2009. San Sebastian, Spain.
6. Davies, M. A.; Yoon, H.; Schmitz, T. L.; Burns, T. J.; Kennedy, M. D.: Calibrated thermal microscopy of the tool-chip interface in machining. Journal of Machining Science and Technology 7(2):166–190, 2003.10.1081/MST-120022776 ↗
7. Johnson, G. R.; Cook, W. H.: A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain ratesand high temperatures. In: 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, 541–547, 1983. The Hague, Netherlands.
8. Boothroyd, G.: Temperatures in orthogonal metal cutting. Proceedings of the Institution of the Mechanical Engineers 177(29):789–802, 1963.
9. Davies, M. A.; Cao, Q.; Cooke, A. L.; Ivester, R.: On the measurement and prediction of temperature fields in machining AISI 1045 steel. Annals of the CIRP 52(1):77–80, 2003.10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60535-6 ↗
10. Buryta, D.; Sowerby, R.; Yellowley, I.: Stress distributions on the rake face during orthogonal machining. International Journal of Mechanical Science 34(5):721–739.10.1016/0890-6955(94)90054-X ↗