A review: challenges, processes, and innovations in high-pressure hydrogen storage technologies
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Hydrogen-powered vehicles are set to become a viable alternative for many of the cars currently on the roads. However, even if hydrogen offers a promising eco-friendly solution for the energy transition, several issues related to its storage and delivery need to be resolved in order to predict its wide use in both stationary and automotive applications. Hydrogen has the lowest volumetric energy density of all commonly used fuels (0.01079 MJ/L at atmospheric pressure). However, compression emerges as a direct and effective solution to this issue, with high pressures capable of significantly enhancing hydrogen's energy density, thereby augmenting its practicality. The energy densities achievable under high pressure are indeed impressive, making hydrogen highly practical. In mobile applications, hydrogen is typically stored as a gas in high-pressure composite overwrapped pressure vessels (COPVs). To achieve optimal functionality for high-pressure applications, two fundamental objectives must be met: ensuring exceptional structural integrity and maximizing gas impermeability. The commercialization of these vessels therefore presents a range of engineering challenges, including the development of advanced manufacturing techniques, the enhancement of structural properties, and the selection of appropriate materials, among others. The trend towards high-pressure hydrogen storage tanks is characterized by low cost, lightweight, and favorable safety performance. Consequently, the development of an efficient, sustainable, and safe high-pressure hydrogen storage method is a crucial focus of recent research, aiming to optimize hydrogen's utility in various applications. This review summarizes the latest developments in the most established hydrogen compression technologies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Ahmad T, Zhang D (2020) A critical review of comparative global historical energy consumption and future demand: the story told so far. Energy Rep 6:1973–1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.07.02010.1016/j.egyr.2020.07.020 ↗
2. Delaporte N, Rivard E, Natarajan SK, Benard P, Trudeau ML, Zaghib K (2020) Synthesis and performance of MOF-based non-noble metal catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells: a review. Nanomaterials 10(10):1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1010194710.3390/nano10101947 ↗
3. Solomon BD, Banerjee A (2006) A global survey of hydrogen energy research, development and policy. Energy Policy 34(7):781–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.00710.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.007 ↗
4. Andrae ASG (2020) Hypotheses for primary energy use, electricity use and CΟ2 emissions of global computing and its shares of the total between 2020 and 2030. Wseas Transact Power Syst 15:50–59. https://doi.org/10.37394/232016.2020.15.610.37394/232016.2020.15.6 ↗
5. Le Quéré C et al (2019) Drivers of declining CO2 emissions in 18 developed economies. Nat Clim Chang 9(3):213–217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0419-710.1038/s41558-019-0419-7 ↗
6. Lahnaoui A, Wulf C, Heinrichs H, Dalmazzone D (2018) Optimizing hydrogen transportation system for mobility by minimizing the cost of transportation via compressed gas truck in North Rhine-Westphalia. Appl Energy 223:317–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.09910.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.099 ↗
7. Sdanghi G, Maranzana G, Celzard A, Fierro V (2019) Review of the current technologies and performances of hydrogen compression for stationary and automotive applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 102:150–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.02810.1016/j.rser.2018.11.028 ↗
8. Sinigaglia T, Lewiski F, Santos Martins ME, Mairesse Siluk JC (2017) Production, storage, fuel stations of hydrogen and its utilization in automotive applications-a review. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42(39):24597–24611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.06310.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.063 ↗
9. Felseghi R-A, Carcadea E, Raboaca MS, Trufin CN, Filote C (2019) Hydrogen fuel cell technology for the sustainable future of stationary applications. Energies 12(23):4593. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1223459310.3390/en12234593 ↗
10. Muradov N, Veziroglu T (2008) ‘Green’ path from fossil-based to hydrogen economy: an overview of carbon-neutral technologies. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33(23):6804–6839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.08.05410.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.08.054 ↗
11. Ayodele TR, Munda JL (2019) Potential and economic viability of green hydrogen production by water electrolysis using wind energy resources in South Africa. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44(33):17669–17687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.05.07710.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.05.077 ↗
12. Gutiérrez-Martín F, Amodio L, Pagano M (2021) Hydrogen production by water electrolysis and off-grid solar PV. Int J Hydrogen Energy 46(57):29038–29048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.09810.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.098 ↗
13. Acar C, Dincer I (2020) The potential role of hydrogen as a sustainable transportation fuel to combat global warming. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45(5):3396–3406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.14910.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.149 ↗
14. Hosseini SE (2020) An outlook on the global development of renewable and sustainable energy at the time of COVID-19. Energy Res Soc Sci 68:101633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.10163310.1016/j.erss.2020.101633 ↗
15. Saeedmanesh A, Mac Kinnon MA, Brouwer J (2018) Hydrogen is essential for sustainability. Curr Opin Electrochem 12:166–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2018.11.00910.1016/j.coelec.2018.11.009 ↗
16. Eljack F, Kazi M-K (2021) Prospects and challenges of green hydrogen economy via multi-sector global symbiosis in Qatar. Front Sustain 1:612762. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2020.61276210.3389/frsus.2020.612762 ↗
17. Yang C, Ogden J (2007) Determining the lowest-cost hydrogen delivery mode. Int J Hydrogen Energy 32(2):268–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.05.00910.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.05.009 ↗
18. Luo W et al (2011) Solar hydrogen generation from seawater with a modified BiVO4 photoanode. Energy Environ Sci 4(10):4046. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ee01812d10.1039/c1ee01812d ↗
19. Grätzel M (2001) Photoelectrochemical cells. Nature 414(6861):338–344. https://doi.org/10.1038/3510460710.1038/35104607 ↗
20. Schlapbach L, Züttel A (2001) Hydrogen-storage materials for mobile applications. Nature 414(6861):353–358. https://doi.org/10.1038/3510463410.1038/35104634 ↗
21. Grobler C (2024) Past, present, and future climate impacts of aviation. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
22. Kovač A, Paranos M, Marciuš D (2021) Hydrogen in energy transition: a review. Int J Hydrogen Energy 46(16):10016–10035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.25610.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.256 ↗
23. Wang W, Wang S, Ma X, Gong J (2011) Recent advances in catalytic hydrogenation of carbon dioxide. Chem Soc Rev 40(7):3703. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cs15008a10.1039/c1cs15008a ↗
24. Lai Q et al (2019) How to design hydrogen storage materials? Fundamentals, synthesis, and storage tanks. Adv Sustain Syst 3(9):1900043. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.20190004310.1002/adsu.201900043 ↗
25. Ghasemi A, Nikafshan Rad H, Izadyar N, Marefati M (2024) Optimizing industrial energy: an eco-efficient system for integrated power, oxygen, and methanol production using coke plant waste heat and electrolysis. Energy Convers Manag: X 22:100571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.10057110.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100571 ↗
26. Khzouz M, Gkanas EI (2020) Hydrogen technologies for mobility and stationary applications: hydrogen production, storage and infrastructure development. In: Al Qubeissi M, El-kharouf A, Serhad Soyhan H (eds) Renewable energy - resources, challenges and applications, intechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.9167610.5772/intechopen.91676 ↗
27. Rivard E, Trudeau M, Zaghib K (2019) Hydrogen storage for mobility: a review. Materials 12(12):1973. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1212197310.3390/ma12121973 ↗
28. Adderly SA, Manukian D, Sullivan TD, Son M (2018) Electric vehicles and natural disaster policy implications. Energy Policy 112:437–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.03010.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.030 ↗
29. Reddi K, Elgowainy A, Rustagi N, Gupta E (2017) Impact of hydrogen refueling configurations and market parameters on the refueling cost of hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42(34):21855–21865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.05.12210.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.05.122 ↗
30. Hudson B (2023) Siting hydrogen refueling stations for heavy duty vehicles within California. M.S. thesis, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA
31. Bonadio L (2009) Fuels – hydrogen storage | liquid, in encyclopedia of electrochemical power sources. Elsevier, pp 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044452745-5.00323-310.1016/B978-044452745-5.00323-3 ↗
32. Sundén B (2022) Fundamentals and applications of hydrogen and fuel cells. In: Asif M (ed) The 4Ds of energy transition, 1st ed. Wiley, pp 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527831425.ch510.1002/9783527831425.ch5 ↗
33. Viswanathan B (2017) Hydrogen Storage. In: Energy sources, Elsevier, pp 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-56353-8.00010-110.1016/B978-0-444-56353-8.00010-1 ↗
34. Zheng J, Liu X, Xu P, Liu P, Zhao Y, Yang J (2012) Development of high pressure gaseous hydrogen storage technologies. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37(1):1048–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.02.12510.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.02.125 ↗
35. Sakintuna B, Lamaridarkrim F, Hirscher M (2007) Metal hydride materials for solid hydrogen storage: a review☆. Int J Hydrogen Energy 32(9):1121–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.11.02210.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.11.022 ↗
36. Barthelemy H, Weber M, Barbier F (2017) Hydrogen storage: recent improvements and industrial perspectives. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42(11):7254–7262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.17810.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.178 ↗
37. Cao Y, Yang Y, Zhao X, Li Q (2021) A review of seasonal hydrogen storage multi-energy systems based on temporal and spatial characteristics. J Renew Mater 9(11):1823–1842. https://doi.org/10.32604/jrm.2021.01572210.32604/jrm.2021.015722 ↗
38. Dalebrook AF, Gan W, Grasemann M, Moret S, Laurenczy G (2013) Hydrogen storage: beyond conventional methods. Chem Commun 49(78):8735. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cc43836h10.1039/c3cc43836h ↗
39. Gianotti E, Taillades-Jacquin M, Rozière J, Jones DJ (2018) High-purity hydrogen generation via dehydrogenation of organic carriers: a review on the catalytic process. ACS Catal 8(5):4660–4680. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b0427810.1021/acscatal.7b04278 ↗
40. Thomas KM (2007) Hydrogen adsorption and storage on porous materials☆. Catal Today 120(3–4):389–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2006.09.01510.1016/j.cattod.2006.09.015 ↗
41. Schüth F, Bogdanović B, Felderhoff M (2004) Light metal hydrides and complex hydrides for hydrogen storage. Chem Commun 20:2249–2258. https://doi.org/10.1039/B406522K10.1039/B406522K ↗
42. Usman MR (2022) Hydrogen storage methods: review and current status. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 167:112743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.11274310.1016/j.rser.2022.112743 ↗
43. Hwang HT, Varma A (2014) Hydrogen storage for fuel cell vehicles. Curr Opin Chem Eng 5:42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2014.04.00410.1016/j.coche.2014.04.004 ↗
44. Magneville B, Gentilleau B, Villalonga S, Nony F, Galiano H (2015) Modeling, parameters identification and experimental validation of composite materials behavior law used in 700 bar type IV hydrogen high pressure storage vessel. Int J Hydrogen Energy 40(38):13193–13205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.12110.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.121 ↗
45. Züttel A (2003) Materials for hydrogen storage. Mater Today 6(9):24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(03)00922-210.1016/S1369-7021(03)00922-2 ↗
46. Xue Q, Wu M, Zeng XC, Jena P (2018) Co-mixing hydrogen and methane may double the energy storage capacity. J Mater Chem A 6(19):8916–8922. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA01909F10.1039/C8TA01909F ↗
47. Taccani R, Malabotti S, Dall’Armi C, Micheli D (2020) High energy density storage of gaseous marine fuels: an innovative concept and its application to a hydrogen powered ferry. ISP 67(1):33–56. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISP-19027410.3233/ISP-190274 ↗
48. Blanc-Vannet P et al (2019) Sample scale testing method to prevent collapse of plastic liners in composite pressure vessels. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44(17):8682–8691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.03110.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.031 ↗
49. Jin Z, Su Y, Lv H, Liu M, Li W, Zhang C (2023) Review of decompression damage of the polymer liner of the type IV hydrogen storage tank. Polymers 15(10):2258. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1510225810.3390/polym15102258 ↗
50. Motaharinejad V et al (2021) Enhancement of adhesion between the polymeric liner and the metallic connector of high-pressure hydrogen storage tank. Int J Mater Form 14(2):249–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-020-01577-610.1007/s12289-020-01577-6 ↗
51. Zhou W et al (2022) Review on optimization design, failure analysis and non-destructive testing of composite hydrogen storage vessel. Int J Hydrogen Energy 47(91):38862–38883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.02810.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.028 ↗
52. Air A, Shamsuddoha M, Gangadhara Prusty B (2023) A review of type V composite pressure vessels and automated fibre placement based manufacturing. Compos Part B Eng 253:110573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11057310.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110573 ↗
53. Oladele IO, Omotosho TF, Adediran AA (2020) Polymer-based composites: an indispensable material for present and future applications. Int J Polym Sc 2020:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/883451810.1155/2020/8834518 ↗
54. Cutolo A et al (2021) Stacking sequences in composite laminates through design optimization. Meccanica 56(6):1555–1574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-020-01233-y10.1007/s11012-020-01233-y ↗
55. Koniuszewska AG, Kaczmar JW (2016) Application of polymer based composite materials in transportation. Prog Rubber Plast Recycl Technol 32(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/14777606160320010110.1177/147776061603200101 ↗
56. Lu L, Xing D, Xie T, Ren N, Logan BE (2010) Hydrogen production from proteins via electrohydrogenesis in microbial electrolysis cells. Biosens Bioelectron 25(12):2690–2695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2010.05.00310.1016/j.bios.2010.05.003 ↗
57. Li H, Lyu Z, Liu Y, Han M, Li H (2021) The effects of infill on hydrogen tank temperature distribution during fast fill. Int J Hydrogen Energy 46(17):10396–10410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.13310.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.133 ↗
58. Okonkwo PC et al (2023) A focused review of the hydrogen storage tank embrittlement mechanism process. Int J Hydrogen Energy 48(35):12935–12948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.25210.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.252 ↗
59. Cheng Q, Zhang R, Shi Z, Lin J (2024) Review of common hydrogen storage tanks and current manufacturing methods for aluminium alloy tank liners. Int J Lightweight Mater Manuf 7(2):269–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2023.08.00210.1016/j.ijlmm.2023.08.002 ↗
60. Li M et al (2019) Review on the research of hydrogen storage system fast refueling in fuel cell vehicle. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44(21):10677–10693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.20810.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.208 ↗
61. Hassan IA, Ramadan HS, Saleh MA, Hissel D (2021) Hydrogen storage technologies for stationary and mobile applications: review, analysis and perspectives. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 149:111311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.11131110.1016/j.rser.2021.111311 ↗
62. Kartav O, Kangal S, Yücetürk K, Tanoğlu M, Aktaş E, Artem HS (2021) Development and analysis of composite overwrapped pressure vessels for hydrogen storage. J Compos Mater 55(28):4141–4155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998321103356810.1177/00219983211033568 ↗
63. Jiang Y, Wei ST, Xu P (2020) Influences of filling process on the thermal-mechanical behavior of composite overwrapped pressure vessel for hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45(43):23093–23102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.15410.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.154 ↗
64. Mair GW, Thomas S, Schalau B, Wang B (2021) Safety criteria for the transport of hydrogen in permanently mounted composite pressure vessels. Int J Hydrogen Energy 46(23):12577–12593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.26810.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.268 ↗
65. Abdalla AM, Hossain S, Nisfindy OB, Azad AT, Dawood M, Azad AK (2018) Hydrogen production, storage, transportation and key challenges with applications: a review. Energy Convers Manage 165:602–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.03.08810.1016/j.enconman.2018.03.088 ↗
66. Air A, Oromiehie E, Prusty BG (2023) Design and manufacture of a type V composite pressure vessel using automated fibre placement. Compos B Eng 266:111027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11102710.1016/j.compositesb.2023.111027 ↗
67. Yamashita A, Kondo M, Goto S, Ogami N (2015) Development of high-pressure hydrogen storage system for the Toyota ‘Mirai, presented at the SAE 2015 world congress & exhibition, pp 2025–01–1169. https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-116910.4271/2015-01-1169 ↗
68. Marbán G, Valdés-Solís T (2007) Towards the hydrogen economy? Int J Hydrogen Energy 32(12):1625–1637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.12.01710.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.12.017 ↗
69. Bossel U, Eliasson B, Taylor G (2003) The future of the hydrogen economy: bright or bleak? Cogeneration Distributed Generation J 18(3):29–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/1545366030950902310.1080/15453660309509023 ↗
70. Hammerschlag R, Mazza P (2005) Questioning hydrogen. Energy Policy 33(16):2039–2043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.04.01010.1016/j.enpol.2004.04.010 ↗
71. Das L (1996) On-board hydrogen storage systems for automotive application. Int J Hydrogen Energy 21(9):789–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3199(96)00006-710.1016/0360-3199(96)00006-7 ↗
72. Shin HK, Ha SK (2023) Techno-economic analysis of type III and IV composite hydrogen storage tanks for fuel cell vehicles. Adv Compos Mater 33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243046.2023.227825810.1080/09243046.2023.2278258 ↗
73. Shin HK, Ha SK (2023) A review on the cost analysis of hydrogen gas storage tanks for fuel cell vehicles. Energies 16(13):5233. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1613523310.3390/en16135233 ↗
74. Tzimas E, Europäische Kommission, (eds) (2003) Hydrogen storage: state-of-the-art and future perspective. In: EUR, no. 20995. Luxembourg: office for official publications of the european communities
75. Suryan A, Kim HD, Setoguchi T (2012) Three dimensional numerical computations on the fast filling of a hydrogen tank under different conditions. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37(9):7600–7611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.01910.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.019 ↗
76. Kumar M (2024) Investigation of hydrogen transport properties through the liner material of 70 MPa type IV composite overwrapped pressure vessels. Int J Press Vessels Pip 208:105150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2024.10515010.1016/j.ijpvp.2024.105150 ↗
77. Zhang Q, Xu H, Jia X, Zu L, Cheng S, Wang H (2020) Design of a 70 MPa type IV hydrogen storage vessel using accurate modeling techniques for dome thickness prediction. Compos Struct 236:111915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11191510.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111915 ↗
78. Berro Ramirez JP, Halm D, Grandidier J-C, Villalonga S, Nony F (2015) 700 bar type IV high pressure hydrogen storage vessel burst – simulation and experimental validation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 40(38):13183–13192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.12610.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.126 ↗
79. Wang X, Li B, Jin X, Han B, Shu C-M (2023) Ultimate pressure-bearing capacity of type III onboard high-pressure hydrogen storage tanks under typical accident scenarios. J Energy Storage 63:107135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.10713510.1016/j.est.2023.107135 ↗
80. Su Y, Lv H, Zhou W, Zhang C (2021) Review of the hydrogen permeability of the liner material of type IV on-board hydrogen storage tank. WEVJ 12(3):130. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj1203013010.3390/wevj12030130 ↗
81. Li X, Huang Q, Liu Y, Zhao B, Li J (2023) Review of the hydrogen permeation test of the polymer liner material of type IV on-board hydrogen storage cylinders. Materials 16(15):5366. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1615536610.3390/ma16155366 ↗
82. Ebermann M, Bogenfeld R, Kreikemeier J, Glüge R (2022) Analytical and numerical approach to determine effective diffusion coefficients for composite pressure vessels. Compos Struct 291:115616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11561610.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115616 ↗
83. Park G, Jang H, Kim C (2021) Design of composite layer and liner for structure safety of hydrogen pressure vessel (type 4). J Mech Sci Technol 35(8):3507–3517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-0723-910.1007/s12206-021-0723-9 ↗
84. Hu Z, Chen M, Pan B (2021) Simulation and burst validation of 70 MPa type IV hydrogen storage vessel with dome reinforcement. Int J Hydrogen Energy 46(46):23779–23794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.18610.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.186 ↗
85. “Hydrogen Storage.pdf.” [Online]. Available: https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/03/f34/fcto-h2-storage-fact-sheet.pdf. Accessed 11 Apr 2024
86. Bellosta Von Colbe J et al (2019) Application of hydrides in hydrogen storage and compression: achievements, outlook and perspectives. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44(15):7780–7808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.10410.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.104 ↗
87. NCC’s all-composite Type V tank demonstrates future composite space tank technology. [Online]. Available: https://www.compositesworld.com/news/nccs-all-composite-type-v-tank-demonstrates-future-composite-space-tank-technology. Accessed 12 Apr 2024
88. Alves MP, Gul W, Cimini Junior CA, Ha SK (2022) A review on industrial perspectives and challenges on material, manufacturing, design and development of compressed hydrogen storage tanks for the transportation sector. Energies 15(14):5152. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1514515210.3390/en15145152 ↗
89. Visvikis C (2013) Evolution in electric vehicle safety legislation and global harmonisation activities. In: 2013 world electric vehicle symposium and exhibition (EVS27). Barcelona, pp 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/EVS.2013.691502410.1109/EVS.2013.6915024 ↗
90. Ortiz Cebolla R, Acosta Iborra B, Harskamp F (2023) Permeation tests in type-approval regulations for hydrogen fuelled vehicles: analysis and testing experiences at the JRC –GASTEF facility. Int J Hydrog Energy 48(47):17923–17939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.29010.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.290 ↗
91. Tapeinos I “Multi-spherical composite-overwrapped cryogenic fuel tanks for hypersonic aircrafts,” [object Object]. https://doi.org/10.4233/UUID:850A6CCC-7686-4536-8469-418691DC2DBB10.4233/UUID:850A6CCC-7686-4536-8469-418691DC2DBB ↗
92. Zhu J, Li Y, Cao W, Li Y, Gao Z (2023) Failure analysis of novel BOSS structures for type IV hydrogen storage vessels. Energies 16(10):4005. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1610400510.3390/en16104005 ↗
93. Matheis R, Murnisya H, Johansson T (2015) Modelling of thick UD composites for Type IV pressure vessels
94. Chen Z, Kirlikovali KO, Idrees KB, Wasson MC, Farha OK (2022) Porous materials for hydrogen storage. Chem 8(3):693–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2022.01.01210.1016/j.chempr.2022.01.012 ↗
95. Yan Y, Zhang J, Li G, Zhou W, Ni Z (2024) Review on linerless type V cryo-compressed hydrogen storage vessels: resin toughening and hydrogen-barrier properties control. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 189:114009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.11400910.1016/j.rser.2023.114009 ↗
96. Wang X et al (2022) Advances on materials design and manufacture technology of plastic liner of type IV hydrogen storage vessel. Int J Hydrogen Energy 47(13):8382–8408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.19810.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.198 ↗
97. Sery J, Leduc P (2022) Fuel cell behavior and energy balance on board a Hyundai Nexo. Int J Engine Res 23(5):709–720. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468087421105904610.1177/14680874211059046 ↗
98. Aminudin MA, Kamarudin SK, Lim BH, Majilan EH, Masdar MS, Shaari N (2023) An overview: current progress on hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. Int J Hydrogen Energy 48(11):4371–4388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.10.15610.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.10.156 ↗
99. Hong BK, Kim SH (2018) (Invited) recent advances in fuel cell electric vehicle technologies of Hyundai. ECS Trans 86(13):3–11. https://doi.org/10.1149/08613.0003ecst10.1149/08613.0003ecst ↗
100. European Commission (2010) Commission Regulation (EU) No 406/2010 of 26 Apr. 2010 implementing regulation (EC) No 79/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of hydrogen-powered motor vehicles (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union, L 122:1–107