journal article·2017-04

Experimental and theoretical investigation of forming limit diagram for Ti-6Al-4 V alloy at warm condition

Nitin Kotkunde, Geetha Krishna, Shyam Krishna Shenoy, Amit Kumar Gupta, Swadesh Kumar Singh

Publisher page

Abstract

Forming limit diagram (FLD) is an important performance index to describe the maximum limit of principal strains that can be sustained by sheet metals till to the onset of localized necking. It is useful tool to access the forming severity of a drawing or stamping processes. In the present work, FLD has been determined experimentally for Ti-6Al-4 V alloy at 400 °C by conducting a hemispherical dome test with specimens of different widths. Additionally, theoretical FLDs have been determined using Marciniak Kuczynski (M-K) model. Various yield criteria namely: Von Mises, Hill 1948, Hill 1993 and Cazacu Barlat in combination with different hardening models viz., Hollomon power law (HPL), Johnson-Cook (JC), modified Johnson-Cook (m-JC), modified Arrhenius (m-Arr.), modified Zerilli–Armstrong (m-ZA) have been used in M-K analysis for theoretical FLD prediction. The material properties required for determination of yield criteria and hardening models constants have been calculated using uniaxial tensile tests. The predicted theoretical FLDs results are compared with experimental FLD. It can be observed that influence of yield criterion in M-K analysis for theoretical FLD prediction is predominant than the hardening model. Based on the results; it is observed that the theoretical FLD using Cazacu Barlat and Hill 1993 yield criteria with m-Arr. hardening model has a very good agreement with experimental FLD.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Li X, Guo G, Xiao J, Song N, Li D (2014) Constitutive modeling and the effects of strain-rate and temperature on the formability of Ti–6Al–4 V alloy sheet. Mater Des 55:325–33410.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.069 ↗
2. Kotkunde N, Krishnamurthy HN, Puranik P, Gupta AK, Singh SK (2014) Microstructure study and constitutive modeling of Ti–6Al–4 V alloy at elevated temperatures. Mater Des 54:96–10310.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.006 ↗
3. Kotkunde N, Deole AD, Gupta AK, Singh SK (2014) Comparative study of constitutive modeling for Ti–6Al–4 V alloy at low strain rates and elevated temperatures. Mater Des 55:999–100510.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.089 ↗
4. Kotkunde N, Deole AD, Gupta AK, Singh SK, Aditya B (2014) Failure and formability studies in warm deep drawing of Ti–6Al–4 V alloy. Mater Des 60:540–54710.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.040 ↗
5. Hosford W, Canddell R (2014) Metal forming mechanics and metallurgy. Third edition, Cambridge University Press
6. Joseph DB, Boyer R, Sanders D (2006) The Boeing Company. Forming of titanium and titanium alloys. ASM Handbook. 14B: metalworking: sheet forming
7. Kotkunde N, Deole AD, Gupta AK, Singh SK (2014) Experimental and numerical investigation of anisotropic yield criteria for warm deep drawing of Ti–6Al–4 V alloy. Mater Des 63:336–34410.1016/j.matdes.2014.06.017 ↗
8. Odenberger E-L, Schill M, Oldenburg M (2013) Thermo-mechanical sheet metal forming of aero engine components in Ti–6Al–4 V—PART 2: constitutive modelling and validation. Int J Mater Form 6:403–41610.1007/s12289-012-1094-7 ↗
9. Kurukuri S, van den Boogaard AH et al (2009) Warm forming simulation of Al–Mg sheet. J Mater Process Technol 209:5636–64510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.05.024 ↗
10. Butuc MC, Gracio JJ, Barata da Rocha A (2003) A theoretical study on forming limit diagrams prediction. J Mater Process Technol 142:714–72410.1016/S0924-0136(03)00813-6 ↗
11. Dasappa P, Inal K, Mishra R (2012) The effects of anisotropic yield functions and their material parameters on prediction of forming limit diagrams. Int J Solids Struct 49:3528–355010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.04.021 ↗
12. Keeler SP, Backofen WA (1963) Plastic instability and fracture in sheets stretched over rigid punches. Trans ASM 56:25–48
13. Banabic D (2010) Sheet metal forming processes. Springer, Verlag Berlin Heidelberg10.1007/978-3-540-88113-1 ↗
14. Panich S, Barlat F, Uthaisangsuk V, Suranuntchai S, Jirathearanat S (2013) Experimental and theoretical formability analysis using strain and stress based forming limit diagram for advanced high strength steels. Mater Des 51:756–6610.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.080 ↗
15. Gang F, Qing-jun L, Li-ping L, Pan Z (2012) Comparative analysis between stress- and strain-based forming limit diagrams for aluminum alloy sheet 1060. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 22:343–4910.1016/S1003-6326(12)61729-4 ↗
16. Narayanasamy R, Sathiya Narayanan C (2007) Experimental analysis and evaluation of forming limit diagram for interstitial free steels. Mater Des 28:1490–151210.1016/j.matdes.2006.03.010 ↗
17. Moshksar MM, Mansorzadeh S (2003) Determination of the forming limit diagram for Al 3105 sheet. J Mater Process Technol 141:138–14210.1016/S0924-0136(03)00262-0 ↗
18. Djavanroodi F, Derogar A (2010) Experimental and numerical evaluation of forming limit diagram for Ti6Al4V titanium and Al6061-T6 aluminum alloys sheets. Mater Des 31:4866–487510.1016/j.matdes.2010.05.030 ↗
19. Mishra NS, Mishra S, Ramaswamy V (1989) Analysis of the temperature dependence of strain-hardening behavior in high-strength steel. Metall Trans A 20A:2819–282910.1007/BF02670174 ↗
20. Ravi Kumar D (2002) Formability analysis of extra-deep drawing steel. J Mater Process Technol 130–131:31–4110.1016/S0924-0136(02)00789-6 ↗
21. Hecker SS (1975) Simple technique for determining forming limit curves. Sheet Met Ind 52:671–75
22. Singh SK, Ravi Kumar D (2008) Effect of process parameters on product surface finish and thickness variation in hydro-mechanical deep drawing. J Mater Process Technol 204:169–17810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.060 ↗
23. Kotkunde N, Aditya DD, Gupta AK, Singh SK (2015) Numerical analysis of warm deep drawing for Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Book Chapter in Advances in Material Forming and Joining Part of the series Topics in Mining, Metallurgy and Materials Engineering pp 109–13910.1007/978-81-322-2355-9_6 ↗
24. Hill R (1948) A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. In: Proceedings of the royal society of London 193 (Series A): 281–29710.1098/rspa.1948.0045 ↗
25. Xu S, Weinmann K (1997) Prediction of forming limit curves of sheet metals using Hill’s 1993 user-friendly yield criterion of anisotropic materials. Int J Mech Sci 40(9):913–92510.1016/S0020-7403(97)00145-8 ↗
26. Cazacu O, Plunkett B, Barlat F (2006) Orthotropic yield criterion for hexagonal closed packed metals. Int J Plast 22:1171–119410.1016/j.ijplas.2005.06.001 ↗
27. Lin YC, Chen X-M (2011) A critical review of experimental results and constitutive descriptions for metals and alloys in hot working. Mater Des 32:1733–175910.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.048 ↗
28. Gordon R, Johnson WHC (1985) Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech 21:31–4810.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
29. Gupta AK, Krishnamurthy HN, Singh Y, Prasad KM, Singh SK (2013) Development of constitutive models for dynamic strain aging regime in Austenitic stainless steel 304. Mater Des 45:616–62710.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.041 ↗
30. Lin YC, Chen M-S, Zhong J (2008) Constitutive modeling for elevated temperature flow behavior of 42CrMo steel. Comput Mater Sci 42:470–47710.1016/j.commatsci.2007.08.011 ↗