The influence and analysis of shot peening sequence on the strengthening performance of complex aviation components
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties · Erosion and Abrasive Machining
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Tu FB, Delbergue D, Miao HY, Klotz T, Brochu M, Bocher P, Levesque M (2017) A sequential DEM-FEM coupling method for shot peening simulation. Surf Coat Tech 48(20):2859–2877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.03.03510.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.03.035 ↗
2. Soyama H (2019) Comparison between the improvements made to the fatigue strength of stainless steel by cavity peening, water jet peening, shot peening, and laser peenin. J Mater Process Tech 269:65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.01.03010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.01.030 ↗
3. Avcu YY, Yetik O, Guney M, Iakovakis E, Sınmazçelik T, Avcu E (2020) Surface, subsurface, and tribological properties of Ti6Al4V alloy shot peened under different parameters. Materials 13(19):1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1319436310.3390/ma13194363 ↗
4. Li GW, Dong ZC, Luo TH, Huang HY (2023) Study on the infuence of shot peening strengthening before shot peen forming on 2024–T351 aluminum alloy fatigue crack growth rate. Sci Rep 13:5313. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32616-210.1038/s41598-023-32616-2 ↗
5. Ohta T (2022) Shot peening intensity and residual stress distribution on cylindrical surface. Mater Trans 63(1):57–62. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.MT-P202100610.2320/matertrans.MT-P2021006 ↗
6. Marini M, Piona F, Fontanari V, Bandini M, Benedetti M (2020) A new challenge in the DEM/FEM simulation of the shot peening process: the residual stress field at a sharp edge. Int J Mech Sci 169:105327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.10532710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105327 ↗
7. Vladislav S, Pierre-Olivier D, Hong YM, Martin L, Frédérick G (2024) Simulation and automation of aluminum panel shot peen forming. Int J Mater Form 17:25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-024-01826-y10.1007/s12289-024-01826-y ↗
8. Hisashi S, Takayuki N, Tomokazu M, Yoshimi W (2023) Atypical phase transformation behavior of Fe-33% Ni alloys induced by shot peening. Surf Coat Tech 462:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.12947010.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129470 ↗
9. Ohta T, Ma N (2020) Shot velocity measurement using particle image velocity and a numerical analysis of the residual stress in fine particle shot peening. J Manuf Process 58:1138–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.08.05910.1016/j.jmapro.2020.08.059 ↗
10. Yin F, Han PC, Han QY, Wang HH, Hua L, Cheng GJ (2024) Ultrastrong gradient M50 bearing steel with lath-shape nano-martensite by ultrasonic shot peening and its enhanced wear resistance at elevated temperature. Mater Des 239:112786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2024.11278610.1016/j.matdes.2024.112786 ↗
11. Song C, Hu S, Han QY, Han XH, Xie LC, Zhuang WH, Yin F, Hua L (2023) Ultrastrong gradient nanostructured CSS-42L bearing steel and its enhanced wear resistance at elevated temperature. Surf Coat Tech 470(15):129881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.12988110.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129881 ↗
12. Ma Z, Chen TY, Wang Z, Xing XG, Hou XD, Chang C (2023) Analysis of residual stress of gear tooth root after shot peening process. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 125:2147–2160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10875-710.1007/s00170-023-10875-7 ↗
13. Zhu PF, Yan HZ, Zhou JB, Zhou YL, Chen Z, Zhang Y (2022) Surface integrity and transmission performance of spiral bevel gears subject to shot peening: A comparison between concave and convex surfaces. Surf Coat Tech 445:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.12867510.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128675 ↗
14. Si CR, Sun WB, Tian Y, Cai J (2023) Cavitation erosion resistance enhancement of the surface modified 2024–T351 Al alloy by ultrasonic shot peening. Surf Coat Tech 452:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.12912210.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.129122 ↗
15. Zhao JY, Tang JY, Zhou WH, Jiang TT, Wu H, Liao XG, Guo MZ (2022) Surface integrity of gear shot peening considering complex geometric conditions: a sequential coupled DEM-FEM method. Surf Coat Tech 449:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.12894310.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128943 ↗
16. Wang X, Xu CL, Zhai AS, Liu M, Huang X, Tian K, Luo XK, Liu CG, Tang ZH, Zhao ZY (2023) Effect of surface stress concentration control and surface material strengthening on the fatigue performance of shot-peened single-crystal superalloy. J Alloy Compd 933:167796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16779610.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167796 ↗
17. Erfan M, Okan U (2021) Optimization of shot peening effect parameters on surface hardness improvement. Met Mater Int 27(9):3173–3185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-020-00758-x10.1007/s12540-020-00758-x ↗
18. Zhang J, Yao C, Tan L, Cui MC, Sun YQ, Ma FW, Min XL, Zhang J (2022) Effects of shot peening parameters, path, and sequence on residual stress of TC17 alloy. P I Mech Eng B J Eng 237(12):1810–1818. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405422113810.1177/09544054221138 ↗
19. Wang CY, Li WG, Jiang JJ, Chao X, Zeng WK, Yang J (2021) Mechanical behavior study of asymmetric deformation in double side symmetric sequential shot peening process. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 114:1189–1204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06933-710.1007/s00170-021-06933-7 ↗
20. Sun H (2021) Shot peening numerical simulation and path planning of TC4 titanium alloy blade. Aeronaut Manuf Tech 64(14):95–100. https://doi.org/10.16080/j.issn1671-833x.2021.14.09510.16080/j.issn1671-833x.2021.14.095 ↗
21. Zhang JB, Lu SH, Zhou Z, Wu TR, Xu G (2017) Modeling ofmultiple shots for analyzing shot peening controlled parameterson formed curvature radius. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(5–8):1867–1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0629-y10.1007/s00170-017-0629-y ↗
22. Xiao XD, Tong X, Li Y, Wei SM, Gao GQ (2018) Analysis of stress increment in shot peen forming weak-stiffness component. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(9–12):4039–4053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1112-510.1007/s00170-017-1112-5 ↗
23. Sun GQ, Wu WP (2024) The infuence of shot peening on mechanical properties, wear, and corrosion resistance of 42CrMo steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 130:5299–5311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13052-610.1007/s00170-024-13052-6 ↗
24. Liu HM, Dong HT, Tang JY, Ding H, Shao W, Zhao JY, Jiang TT (2021) Numerical modeling and experimental verification of surface roughness of 12Cr2Ni4A alloy steel generated by shot peening. Surf Coat Tech 422:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.12753810.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127538 ↗
25. Xiao XD, Tong X, Liu YW, Zhao RF, Gao GQ, Li Y (2018) Prediction of shot peen forming effects with single and repeated impacts. Int J Mech Sci 137:182–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.01.00610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.01.006 ↗
26. Iswanto PT, Yaqin RI, Sadida HM (2020) Influence of shot peening on surface properties and corrosion resistance of plant material AISI 316L. Metalurgija 59(3):309–312. https://hrcak.srce.hr/237025
27. Nicholas B, Majid V, Lloyd H, Keivan D (2023) Microstructural and mechanical characterization of pearlite steel after high intensity laser peening and shot peening. Manuf Lett 38:35–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2023.09.00410.1016/j.mfglet.2023.09.004 ↗
28. Liu Y, Li MQ, Liu HJ (2016) Surface nanocrystallization and gradient structure developed in the bulk TC4 alloy processed by shot peening. J Alloy Compd 685:186–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.29510.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.295 ↗
29. Ali M, Ali H, Kamran A, Reza A (2022) The effect of shot peening time on mechanical properties and residual stress in Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Metall Res Tech 119:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1051/metal/202203610.1051/metal/2022036 ↗
30. Siwat L, Mongkol B, Prathompoom N (2023) On the severe shot peening effect to generate nanocrystalline surface rewards enhancing fatigue life of injection molded Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Mater Sci 58(39):15513–15528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08978-310.1007/s10853-023-08978-3 ↗
31. Chiquetia CM, Vatavuka J, Calicchioa L (2023) Relations of compressive residual dtress on prestressed surfaces submitted to the stress shot peening process in EN 47 spring steel. Mater Res 26:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2022-058910.1590/1980-5373-MR-2022-0589 ↗
32. Mounira B, Soumaya M, Achouri S, Amel O, Latifa K, Ahlem T, Majdi Abdelraouf M, Lakhdar L (2023) Study of surface topography parameters during shot peening process and their influence on the paint coating of adhesion. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 126(9–10):3981–3993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11365-610.1007/s00170-023-11365-6 ↗
33. Erfan M, Okan U, Kashyzadeh R (2021) Influences of shot peening parameters on mechanical properties and fashion behavior of 316L steel: experimental, taguchi method and response surface methodology. Met Mater Int 27(11):4418–4440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-021-01013-710.1007/s12540-021-01013-7 ↗
34. Li KF, Wang C, Hu XY, Zhou YJ, Lai YB, Wang CL (2021) DEM-FEM coupling simulation of residual stresses and surface roughness induced by shot peening of TC4 titanium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 118(5–6):1469–1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07905-710.1007/s00170-021-07905-7 ↗
35. Murat K, Burak S, Ibrahim G (2023) Application of GOV (flow peening) process to improve surface quality of Ti-6Al-4V of aerospace material. Int J Surf Sci Eng 17(3):195–230. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSURFSE.2023.13478410.1504/IJSURFSE.2023.134784 ↗
36. Li FF, Zhao YW, Chen XL, Lu C, LuL SuB, Liu F, Zou DL, Liu KZ (2022) Microstructure changes and mechanical properties of U-2Nb alloy induced by shot peening treatment. J Alloy Compd 896:162977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16297710.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162977 ↗
37. Yang Q, Cheng JH, Guan H, Tan W, Zhang Y (2022) Investigation of wet shot peening on microstructural evolution and tense tense tense fatigue properties of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Mater Chem Phys 291:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.12663510.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126635 ↗