journal article·2015-09

A FEM-DBEM investigation of the influence of process parameters on crack growth in aluminum friction stir welded butt joints

Pierpaolo Carlone, Roberto Citarella, Marcello Lepore, Gaetano S. Palazzo

Publisher page

Abstract

Medium to high strength aluminum alloys, such as 2xxx, 6xxx, and 7xxx series, are actually considered of great interest in the transport industries. For aeronautical applications, the precipitation hardenable AA2024 (Al-Cu) alloy is gaining considerable attention, in particular for the realization of nose barrier beam or fuselage panels. In this context, remarkable research effort is currently focused on the application of the Friction Stir Welding (FSW) process, as a suitable alternative to fusion welding processes. The interest in aeronautical application of FSW process is also justified by the reduction of production costs and weight and by the increase of strength and damage tolerance with respect to riveted lap joints. The implementation of the technique in safety-critical components, however, requires a deeper understanding of static strength as well as of fatigue behavior of FSWed assemblies. In this sense some experimental results have already been presented in the inherent literature, relatively, for instance, to AA6082-T6 and AA6061-T6, AA6063-T6, AA2024-T351, AA2024-T8 alloys processed by FSW. Despite the unavoidable relevance of experimental testing, a numerical approach able to predict the mechanical behavior of FSWed assemblies is very desirable, in order to achieve time and cost compression and to implement computational optimization procedures. This paper deals with a numerical investigation on the influence of FSW process parameters, namely the rotating speed and the welding speed, on fatigue crack growth in AA2024-T3 butt joints. The computational approach is based on a combined Finite Element Method (FEM) and Dual Boundary Element Method (DBEM) procedure, in order to take advantage of the main capabilities of the two methods. In particular, linear elastic FE simulations have been performed to evaluate the process induced residual stresses, by means of a recently developed technique named contour method. The computed residual stress field has then been superimposed to the stress field produced by an applied fatigue traction load in a Dual Boundary Element Method (DBEM) environment, where the simulation of a crack, initiated and propagating along the previously mentioned cutting line, can be performed in an automatic way. A two-parameters crack growth law is used for the crack propagation rate assessment. The DBEM code BEASY and the FEM code ANSYS have been sequentially coupled in the aforementioned numerical approach by using a BEASY interface module and in house developed routines. Computational results have been compared with experimental data, showing a satisfactory agreement. The influence of process parameters on the residual stresses distribution has also been highlighted.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Schmidt HNB, Dickerson TL, Hattel JH (2006) Material flow in butt friction stir welds in AA2024-T3. Acta Mater 54:1199–120910.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.052 ↗
2. Sutton MA, Yang B, Reynolds AP, Taylor R (2002) Microstructural studies of friction stir welds in 2024-T3 aluminum. Mater Sci Eng A-Struct 323:160–16610.1016/S0921-5093(01)01358-2 ↗
3. Yang B, Yan J, Sutton MA, Reynolds AP (2004) Banded microstructure in AA2024-T351 and AA2524-T351 aluminum friction stir welds Part I. Metallurgical studies. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 364:55–6510.1016/S0921-5093(03)00532-X ↗
4. Khodir SA, Shibayanagi T (2008) Friction stir welding of dissimilar AA2024 and AA7075 aluminum alloys. Mat Sci Eng B-Adv 148:82–8710.1016/j.mseb.2007.09.024 ↗
5. Carlone P, Palazzo GS (2013) Longitudinal residual stress analysis in AA2024-T3 friction stir welding. The Open Mech Eng J 7:18–2610.2174/1874155X01307010018 ↗
6. Liu HJ, Fujii H, Maeda M, Nogi K (2003) Tensile properties and fracture locations of friction-stir-welded joints of 2017-T351 aluminum alloy. J Mater Process Tech 142:692–69610.1016/S0924-0136(03)00806-9 ↗
7. Su J-Q, Nelson TW, Mishra R, Mahoney M (2003) Microstructural investigation of friction stir welded 7050-T651 aluminium. Acta Mater 51:713–72910.1016/S1359-6454(02)00449-4 ↗
8. Paulo RMF, Carlone P, Valente RAF, Teixeira-Dias F, Palazzo GS (2014) Influence of friction stir welding residual stresses on the compressive strength of aluminium alloy plates, thin wall. Struct 74:184–190
9. Moreira PMGP, de Jesus AMP, Ribeiro AS, de Castro PMST (2008) Fatigue crack growth in friction stir welds of 6082-T6 and 6061-T6 aluminium alloys: a comparison. Theor Appl Fract Mec 50:81–9110.1016/j.tafmec.2008.07.007 ↗
10. Moreira PMGP, de Oliveira FMF, de Castro PMST (2008) Fatigue behavior of notched specimens of friction stir welded aluminium alloy 6063-T6. J Mater Process Tech 207:283–29210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.113 ↗
11. Kainuma S, Katsuki H, Iwai I, Kumagai M (2008) Evaluation of fatigue strength of friction stir butt-welded aluminum alloy joints inclined to applied cyclic stress. Int J Fatigue 30:870–87610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.06.007 ↗
12. Hatamleh O (2009) A comprehensive investigation on the effects of laser and shot peening on fatigue crack growth in friction stir welded AA 2195 joints. Int J Fatigue 31:974–98810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.03.029 ↗
13. Uyyuru RK, Kailas SV (2006) Numerical analysis of friction stir welding process. J Mater Eng Perform 15:505–51810.1361/105994906X136070 ↗
14. Schmidt H, Hattel J (2005) A local model for the thermomechanical conditions in friction stir welding. Model Simul Mater Sc 13:77–9310.1088/0965-0393/13/1/006 ↗
15. Carlone P, Citarella R, Lepore M, Palazzo GS (2012) Numerical Crack Growth Analysis in AA2024-T3 Friction Stir Welded Butt Joints, Proceedings of The Eighth International Conference on Engineering Computational Technology, Dubrovnik–Croatia, p 4–710.4203/ccp.100.91 ↗
16. Lombard H, Hattingh DG, Steuwer A, James MN (2009) Effect of process parameters on the residual stresses in AA5083-H321 friction stir welds. Mat Sci and Eng A-Struct 501:119–12410.1016/j.msea.2008.09.078 ↗
17. Deplus K, Simar A, Van Haver W, de Meester B (2011) Residual stresses in aluminium alloy friction stir welds. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 56:493–50410.1007/s00170-011-3210-0 ↗
18. Milan MT, Bose Filho WW, Tarpani JR, Malafaia AMS, Silva CPO, Pellizer BC, Pereira LE (2007) Residual stress evaluation of AA2024-T3 friction stir welded joints. J Mater Eng Perform 16:86–9210.1007/s11665-006-9013-z ↗
19. Peel M, Stewer A, Preuss M, Withers PJ (2003) Microstructure, mechanical properties and residual stress as a function of welding speed in aluminium AA5083 friction stir welds. Acta Mater 51:4791–480110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00319-7 ↗
20. Citarella R, Lepore M, Fellinger J, Bykov V, Schauer F (2013) Coupled FEM-DBEM method to assess crack growth in magnet system of Wendelstein 7-X. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale 26:92–10310.3221/IGF-ESIS.26.10 ↗
21. Citarella R, Cricrì G, Lepore M, Perrella M (2014) Thermo-mechanical crack propagation in aircraft engine vane by coupled FEM-DBEM approach. Adv Eng Softw 67:57–6910.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.07.006 ↗
22. Citarella R, Cricrì G, Lepore M, Perrella M (2014) Assessment of crack growth from a cold worked hole by coupled FEM-DBEM approach. Key Eng Mater 577–578:669–672
23. Citarella R, Cricrì G (2009) A two-parameter model for crack growth simulation by combined FEM-DBEM approach. Adv EngSoftw 40:363–377
24. Prime MB (2001) Cross-sectional mapping of residual stresses by measuring the surface contour after a cut. J Eng Mater-T 123:162–16810.1115/1.1345526 ↗
25. Sadananda K, Vasudevan AK (1997) Short crack growth and internal stresses. Int J Fatigue 19:99–10810.1016/S0142-1123(97)00057-1 ↗
26. Carlone P, Palazzo GS (2013) Influence of process parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties in AA2024-T3 friction stir welding. Metallography Microstruc Anal 2:213–22210.1007/s13632-013-0078-4 ↗
27. Bueckner HF (1958) The propagation of cracks and the energy of elastic deformations. Trans of the ASME 80:1225–1230
28. Citarella R, Carlone P, Lepore M, Palazzo GS (2014) Numerical-Experimental Crack Growth Analysis in AA2024-T3 FSWed Butt Joints, Computer and Structure10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.09.018 ↗
29. Citarella R, Cricrì G, Armentani E (2013) Multiple crack propagation with dual boundary element method in stiffened and reinforced full scale aeronautic panels. Key Eng Mater 560:129–15510.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.560.129 ↗
30. Citarella R, Cricrì G (2010) Comparison of DBEM and FEM crack path predictions in a notched shaft under torsion. Eng Fract Mech 77:1730–174910.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.03.012 ↗