journal article·2008-04

Techniques of shrinkage stress reduction in dental restorations

P. Kowalczy, W. Gambin

Publisher page

Abstract

Shrinkage stresses are one of the major problems in dental restoration practice. New techniques of stresses reduction at the restoration-tooth interface are proposed. The propositions are tested for bonded inlays restorations using finite element analysis based on the ABAQUS program. Mechanical properties of photo-cured material, as well as, dentin, enamel and pulp are based on data given in the literature. Two kinds of restorations are taken into account: class I and class II. The paper consists of two parts. At first, polymerization shrinkage for restoration made by classical incremental technique is investigated. Here, a corresponding Huber-Mises’ stress distributions in the whole tooth and two classes of restorations are presented. Next, two methods of stress reduction based on a selective light curing of restoration are investigated. Both methods provide significant reduction of the Huber-Mises stresses in restoration and tooth tissue, especially in the class I restorations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental Erosion and Treatment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (8)

Show source-provided references
1. D.N. Bardwell, S. Deliperi, An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations, JADA 133, (2002).10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0055 ↗
2. P. Kowalczyk, Microscopic and macroscopic modelling of polymerization shrinkage, In: Recent Advances in Mechatronics, Eds. R. Jablonski et al, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2007) 386–390.10.1007/978-3-540-73956-2_76 ↗
3. F.P. Jacobs, Rapid prototyping & manufacturing, fundamentals of stereolithography, MI USA (1992)
4. A. Versluis, W.H. Douglas, M. Cross, Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stress? J Dent Res 75 (1996) 871–878.10.1177/00220345960750030301 ↗
5. R.H. Kujis, W.M.M. Fennis, Does layering minimize shrinkage stresses in composite restorations? J Dent Res 82 (2003) 967–971.10.1177/154405910308201206 ↗
6. M.W. Wnkler, T.R. Katona, N.R. Paydar, Finite element stress analysis of three filling techniques for class V lightcured restorations, J Dent Res 75 (1996) 1477–1483.10.1177/00220345960750070701 ↗
7. G. Couegnat, S.L. Fok, J.E. Cooper, A.J.E. Qualtrough, Structural optimisation of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth, Dental Materials 22 (2006) 3–12.10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.003 ↗
8. W. Gambin, Analytical model of shrinkage stress development during polymerization processes, (submitted to ESAFORM 2008 Conference).10.1007/s12289-008-0281-z ↗