journal article·2025-09

Numerical optimization of SPIF for steel matrix composites using an elastoplastic damage model and desirability-based RSM

Abir Bouhamed, Hajer Ellouz, Hanen Jrad

Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Metallurgy and Material Forming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Duflou J, Tunckol Y, Szekeres A, Vanherck P (2007) Experimental study on force measurements for single point incremental forming. J Mater Process Technol 189(1–3):65–7210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.01.005 ↗
2. Besong LI, Buhl J, Bambach M (2019) Investigations on hole-flanging by paddle forming and a comparison with single point incremental forming. Int J Mech Sci 164:10514310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105143 ↗
3. Abdelkefi A, Guines D, Leotoing L, Thuillier S (2022) Relevant material characterization for load prediction in incremental forming. Int J Mater Form 15(3):2310.1007/s12289-022-01676-6 ↗
4. Li Y, Liu Z, Daniel WJT, Meehan PA (2014) Simulation and experimental observations of effect of different contact interfaces on the incremental sheet forming process. Mater Manuf Processes 29(2):121–12810.1080/10426914.2013.822977 ↗
5. Diabb J, Rodríguez CA, Mamidi N, Sandoval JA, Taha-Tijerina J, Martínez-Romero O, Elías-Zúñiga A (2017) Study of lubrication and wear in single point incremental sheet forming (SPIF) process using vegetable oil nanolubricants. Wear 376:777–78510.1016/j.wear.2017.01.045 ↗
6. Milutinović M, Lendjel R, Baloš S, Zlatanović DL, Sevšek L, Pepelnjak T (2021) Characterisation of geometrical and physical properties of a stainless-steel denture framework manufactured by single-point incremental forming. J Mater Res Technol 10:605–62310.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.014 ↗
7. Kim M, Lee H, Park N (2022) Evaluation of deformation for titanium alloy sheet in single point incremental forming based on asymmetric yield function. Int J Mater Form 15(5):6610.1007/s12289-022-01712-5 ↗
8. Ambrogio G, Conte R, Napoli De L, Fragomeni G, Gagliardi F (2015) Forming approaches comparison for high customised skull manufacturing. Key Eng Mater 651:925–93110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.651-653.925 ↗
9. Ambrogio G, Palumbo G, Sgambitterra E, Guglielmi P, Piccininni A, Napoli De L, Fragomeni G (2018) Experimental investigation of the mechanical performances of titanium cranial prostheses manufactured by super plastic forming and single-point incremental forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98:1489–150310.1007/s00170-018-2338-6 ↗
10. Palumbo G, Brandizzi M (2012) Experimental investigations on the single point incremental forming of a titanium alloy component combining static heating with high tool rotation speed. Mater Des 40:43–5110.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.031 ↗
11. Shanmuganatan SP, Kumar VS (2012) Experimental investigation and finite element modeling on profile forming of conical component using Al 3003 (O) alloy. Mater Des 36:564–56910.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.066 ↗
12. Dewangan YK, Banjare R, Faye A, Bandyopadhyay K (2024) Experimentation and FE analysis of low carbon steel-based laser welded tailored blanks in case of single point incremental forming. Mech Adv Mater Struct 1–1610.1080/15376494.2024.2427383 ↗
13. Ben Said L, Bouhamed A, Wali M, Ayadi B, Betrouni SA, Hajji H, Dammak F (2021) SPIF manufacture of a dome part made of AA1060-H14 aluminum alloy using CNC lathe machine: Numerical and experimental investigations. Arab J Sci Eng 46:12207–1222010.1007/s13369-021-05919-7 ↗
14. Li Y, Chen X, Zhai W, Wang L, Li J, Guoqun Z (2018) Effects of process parameters on thickness thinning and mechanical properties of the formed parts in incremental sheet forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98:3071–308010.1007/s00170-018-2469-9 ↗
15. Gatea S, Ou H, McCartney G (2016) Review on the influence of process parameters in in-cremental sheet forming. The Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87:479–49910.1007/s00170-016-8426-6 ↗
16. Jeswiet J, Micari F, Hirt G, Bramley A, Duflou J, Allwood J (2005) Asymmetric single point incremental forming of sheet metal. CIRP Ann 54(2):88–11410.1016/S0007-8506(07)60021-3 ↗
17. Hussain G, Gao L, Hayat N, Qijian L (2007) The effect of variation in the curvature of part on the formability in incremental forming: An experimental investigation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(14):2177–218110.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.05.001 ↗
18. Silva MB, Skjødt M, Bay N, Martins PAF (2009) Revisiting single-point incremental forming and formability/failure diagrams by means of finite elements and experimentation. J Strain Anal Eng Des 44(4):221–23410.1243/03093247JSA522 ↗
19. Echrif SB, Hrairi M (2014) Significant parameters for the surface roughness in incremental forming process. Mater Manuf Process 29(6):697–70310.1080/10426914.2014.901519 ↗
20. Bagudanch I, Vives-Mestres M, Sabater M, Garcia-Romeu ML (2017) Polymer incremental sheet forming process: temperature analysis using response surface methodology. Mater Manuf Process 32(1):44–5310.1080/10426914.2016.1176191 ↗
21. Bouhamed A, Dammak M, Hagui H, Jrad H (2025) Multiscale mechanical characterization of 3D-printed PLA composites with carbon fiber reinforcement: effect of raster angle and layer thickness. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 137:4805–4824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-025-15446-610.1007/s00170-025-15446-6 ↗
22. Abdelkader WB, HMIDA RB, Sbayti M, Bahloul R (2024) Optimization study of single point incremental forming process of low carbon steel/CP-Titanium bimetallic sheets using grey relational analysis and response surface methodology10.21203/rs.3.rs-4102628/v1 ↗
23. Bouhamed A, Jrad H, Wali M (2024) A multifaceted approach using RVE homogenization methodology for identification of elastoplastic behavior of steel matrix composite: Application to deep-drawing process. Mech Adv Mater Struct 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2024.239485310.1080/15376494.2024.2394853 ↗
24. Dammak M, Bouhamed A, Jrad H (2024) Experimental analysis and modeling of mixed hardening of Steel Matrix Composites under monotonic and reverse simple shear loading: Application to SPIF process. Mech Adv Mater Struct 32(4):718–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2024.235493510.1080/15376494.2024.2354935 ↗
25. Dammak M, Bouhamed A, Jrad H, Dammak F (2024) In situ experimental characterization and numerical investigation of Fe-TiB2 Steel Matrix Composite behavior considering fully coupled damage model: simulation during incremental forming process. Mater Today Commun 38:10774110.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107741 ↗
26. Lemaître J, Chaboche JL (1978) Aspect phénoménologique de la rupture par endommagement. J Méc Appl 2(3)
27. Bouhamed A, Jrad H, Ben Said L, Wali M, Dammak F (2020) The Influence of Process Parameters on Single Point Incremental Forming: Numerical Investigation. In: Aifaoui, N., et al. Design and Modeling of Mechanical Systems - IV. CMSM 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27146-6_3210.1007/978-3-030-27146-6_32 ↗
28. Elleuch S, Jrad H, Kessentini A, Wali M, Dammak F (2021) Design optimization of implant geometrical characteristics enhancing primary stability using FEA of stress distribution around dental prosthesis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 24(9):1035–105110.1080/10255842.2020.1867112 ↗
29. Shi XY, Jin DW, Sun QY, Li WW (2010) Optimization of conditions for hydrogen production from brewery wastewater by anaerobic sludge using desirability function approach. Renew Energy 35(7):1493–149810.1016/j.renene.2010.01.003 ↗
30. Lenth RV (2010) Response-surface methods in R, using rsm. J Stat Softw 32:1–17
31. Box GE, Hunter JS, Hunter WG (2005) Statistics for experimenters. In Wiley series in probability and statistics. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
32. Khuri AI, Cornell JA (1996) Responses Surfaces: Design and Analyses, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, Monticello, NY
33. Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12(4):214–21910.1080/00224065.1980.11980968 ↗
34. Manohar M, Joseph J, Selvaraj T, Sivakumar D (2013) Application of desirability-function and RSM to optimise the multi-objectives while turning Inconel 718 using coated carbide tools. Int J Manuf Technol Manag 27(4–6):218–237