A comparison of failure prediction methods for superplastic deformation
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a comparison between a number of different failure prediction methods for superplastic forming processes. Attention is limited here to superplastic forming of Ti-6Al-4V at 927°C. The failure prediction methods considered include the flow localisation factor approach, forming limit curves based on void growth models, such as the Rice and Tracey model and the Cocks and Ashby model, and a recently-presented superplastic forming limit diagram (SPFLD) approach. Finite element modelling of the forming process is employed to assess the failure prediction methods and the predicted results are compared with available test data.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Hart, E.W. “Theory of the tensile test,” Acta Metallurgica, 15, 1967, pp. 351–355.10.1016/0001-6160(67)90211-8 ↗
2. Ghosh, A.K., “Tensile instability and necking in materials with strain hardening and strain-rate hardening,” Acta Metallurgica, 25, 1977, pp. 1413–1424.10.1016/0001-6160(77)90072-4 ↗
3. Chung, L.C. and Cheng, J.-H., “The analysis of instability and strain concentration during superplastic deformation,” Mat. Sci. Eng., A308, 2001, pp. 153–160.10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01983-3 ↗
4. Ding, X.D., Zbib, H.M., Hamilton, C.H., Bayoumi, A.E., “On the stability of biaxial stretching with application to the optimisation of superplastic blow-forming,” Trans ASME, J Eng Mats Tech, 119, 1997, pp. 26–31.10.1115/1.2805969 ↗
5. Marciniak, Z, and Kuczynski, K. “Limit strains in the processes of stretch-forming sheet metal,” Int J Mech Sci, 9, 1967, pp. 609–620.10.1016/0020-7403(67)90066-5 ↗
6. Chung, L.C. and Cheng, J.-H., “Fracture criterion and forming pressure design for superplastic forming,” Mat. Sci. Eng., A333, 2002, pp. 146–154.10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01818-4 ↗
7. Yatomi, M., Bettinson, A.D., O’Dowd, N.P., Nikbin, K.M., “Modelling of damage development and failure in notched-bar multiaxial creep tests,” Fat Fract Eng Mats Structs, 27, 2004, 283–295.10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00755.x ↗
8. Krohn, M.A., Leen, S.B., Hyde, T.H., “A superplastic forming limit diagram concept for Ti-6Al-4V,” Proc Instn Mech. Engrs, Part L: J. Mats Design & Applications, 221(L4), 2007, 251–264.10.1243/14644207JMDA150 ↗
9. Zhou, M. and Dunne, F.P.E., Mechanisms-based constitutive equations for the superplastic behaviour of a titanium alloy, J. Strain Analysis 31, 1996, 65–73.10.1243/03093247V313187 ↗
10. Ghosh, A.K. and Hamilton, C.H., Mechanical behaviour and hardening characteristics of a superplastic Ti-6Al-4V alloy, Met Trans, 10A, 1979, 699–706.10.1007/BF02658391 ↗
11. Lin, J., Selection of material models for predicting necking in superplastic forming, Int J Plasticity, 19, 2003, 469–481.10.1016/S0749-6419(01)00059-6 ↗
12. Leen, SB, Krohn, M, Hyde, TH, “Strain-based failure prediction for superplastic forming,” ESAFORM 2006, Eds N Juster & A Rosochowski, Glasgow, April 2006, 351–354.