Damage and fracture during sheet-metal forming of alloy 718
Source abstract
Abstract
Forming nickel-based superalloy aero-engine components is a challenging process, largely because of the risk of high degree of springback and issues with formability. In the forming tests conducted on alloy 718 at room temperature, open fractures are observed in the drawbead regions, which are not predicted while evaluating the formability using the traditional forming-limit diagram (FLD). This highlights the importance of an accurate prediction of failure during forming as, in some cases, may severely influence the springback and thereby the accuracy of the predicted shape distortions, leading the final shape of the formed component out of tolerance. In this study, the generalised incremental stress-state dependent damage model (GISSMO) is coupled with the isotropic von Mises and the anisotropic Barlat Yld2000-2D yield criteria to predict the material failure in the forming simulations conducted on alloy 718 using LS-DYNA. Their effect on the predicted effective plastic strains and shape deviations is discussed. The failure and instability strains needed to calibrate the GISSMO are directly obtained from digital image correlation (DIC) measurements in four different specimen geometries i.e. tensile, plane strain, shear, and biaxial. The damage distribution over the drawbeads is measured using a non-linear acoustic technique for validation purposes. The numerical simulations accurately predict failure at the same regions as those observed in the experimental forming tests. The expected distribution of the damage over the drawbeads is in accordance with the experimental measurements. The results highlight the potential of considering DIC to calibrate the GISSMO in combination with an anisotropic material model for forming simulations in alloy 718.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. LIGHTer (2013) Lightweight solutions strengthen Swedish competitiveness and growth – for a sustainable society. Strategic research and innovation agenda for lightweight 2013-2033. http://www.lighterarena.com/media/152731/lattviktsagenda_eng_141107.pdf . Accessed 3 April 2018
2. Reed RC (2006) The Superalloys. Fundamentals and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York10.1017/CBO9780511541285 ↗
3. Anderson D, Butcher C, Pathak N, Worswich MJ (2017) Failure parameter identification and validation for a dual-phase 780 steel sheet. Int J Solids Struct 124:89–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.06.01810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.06.018 ↗
4. Till ET, Hackl B, Schauer H (2011) Crash simulation of roll formed parts by damage modelling taking into account performing effects. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference and workshop on numerical simulation of 3D sheet metal forming processes (NUMISHEET 2011). Seoul10.1063/1.3623620 ↗
5. Huang G, Zhu H, Sriram S (2014) Fracture prediction and correlation of AlSi hot stamped steels with different models in LS-DYNA. In: Proceedings of the 13th international LS-DYNA users conference. Dearborn
6. Andrade FXC, Feutch M, Haufe A, Neukamm F (2016) An incremental stress state dependent damage model for ductile fracture prediction. Int J Fract 200:127–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-016-0081-210.1007/s10704-016-0081-2 ↗
7. Heibel S, Nester W, Clausmeyer T, Tekkaya AE (2017) Failure assessment in sheet metal forming using a phenomenological damage model and fracture criterion: experiments, parameter identification and validation. Procedia Eng 207:2066–2071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.106510.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.1065 ↗
8. Haller KCE, Andersson SAK, Martinsen H (2012) Crack detection in cast stainless steel valve utilizing nonlinear acoustics. In: Proceedings of the 6th european workshop on structural health monitoring. Dresden
9. Hedberg CM, Johnson E, Andersson SAK, Haller KCE, Kjell G, Hellbratt SE (2012) Ultrasonic monitoring of a fiber reinforced plastic-steel composite beam during fatigue. In: Proceedings of the 6th european workshop on structural health monitoring. Dresden
10. Sigvant M, Mattiasson K, Vegter H, Thilderkvist P (2009) A viscous pressure bulge test for the determination of a plastic hardening curve and equibiaxial material data. Int J Mater Form 2:235–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-009-0407-y10.1007/s12289-009-0407-y ↗
11. Nakazima K, Kikuma T, Hasuka K (1968) Study on the formability of steel sheets. Yawata Tech Rep 264:8517–8530
12. Barlat F, Brem J, Yoon J, Chung K, Dick R, Ledge D, Pourgoghrat F, Choi S, Chu E (2003) Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets – part 1: theory. Int J Plast 19:1297–1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-010.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-0 ↗
13. Barlat F, Lian J (1989) Plasticity behaviour and strechability of sheet metals. Part I: a yield function of orthotropic sheets under plane stress condition. Int J Plast 5:51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-6419(89)90019-310.1016/0749-6419(89)90019-3 ↗
14. Odenberger EL, Jansson M, Thilderkvist P, Gustavsson H, Oldenburg M (2008) A short lead time methodology for design, compensation and manufacturing of deep drawing tools for inconel 718. In: Proceedings of the international deep drawing research group (IDDRG) 2008 international conference. Olofström
15. Neukamm F, Feucht M, Haufe A, Roll K (2008) On closing the constitutive gap between forming and crash simulation. In: Proceedings of the 10th international LS-DYNA users conference. Dearborn
16. Kachanov M (1999) Rupture time under creep conditions. Int J Fract 97:11–1810.1023/A:1018671022008 ↗
17. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1985) Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech 21:31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-910.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
18. Neukamm F, Feucht M, Haufe A (2008) Consistent damage modelling in the process chain of forming to crashworthiness simulations. In: Proceedings of the 2008 German LS-DYNA Forum. Bamberg
19. Effelsberg J, Haufe A, Feucht M, Neukamm F, Du Bois P (2012) On parameter identification for the GISSMO damage model. In: Proceedings of the 12th international LS-DYNA users conference. Detroit
20. Lemaitre J (1985) A continuous damage mechanics model for ductile fracture. J Eng Mater Technol 107:83–89. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.322577510.1115/1.3225775 ↗
21. Marth S, Häggblad HÅ, Oldenburg M, Östlund R (2016) Post necking characterisation for sheet metal materials using full field measurement. J Mater Process Technol 238:315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.07.03610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.07.036 ↗
22. Haufe A, Du Bois P, Neukamm F, Feucht M (2011) GISSMO – Material modeling with a sophisticated failure criteria. In: Proceedings of the german LS-DYNA forum. Stuttgart