Recent advances in 4D printing hydrogel for biological interfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
4D printed hydrogels are 3D printed objects whose properties and functions are programmable. In the definition of 4D printing, the fourth dimension arises from the ability of printed structures to change their shape and/or function over time when exposed to given conditions environmental stimuli, during their post-press life. Stimulation-responsive hydrogels produced by the emerging 4D bioprinting technology are currently considered as encouraging tools for various biomedical applications due to their exciting properties such as stretchability, biocompatibility, ultra-flexibility, and printability. Using 3D printing technology, customized functional structures with controllable geometry and trigger ability can be autonomously printed onto desired biological interfaces without considering microfabrication techniques. In this review, by studying the progress in the field of hydrogels for biointerfaces, we summarized the techniques of 4D printing gels, the classification of bioinks, the design strategies of actuators. In addition, we also introduced the applications of 4D hydrogels in tissue repair, vascular grafts, drug delivery, and wearable sensors. Comprehensive insights into the constraints, critical requirements for 4D bioprinting including the biocompatibility of materials, precise designs for meticulous transformations, and individual variability in biological interfaces.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Gladman S, Matsumoto EA, Nuzzo RG, Mahadevan L, Lewis JA (2016) “Biomimetic 4D printing,“ (in eng), Nature materials, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 413-8, Apr10.1038/nmat4544 ↗
2. Sun X, Yao F, Li J (2020) Nanocomposite hydrogel-based strain and pressure sensors: a review. J Mater Chem A 8(36):18605–1862310.1039/D0TA06965E ↗
3. Leu Alexa R et al (2021) “3D-Printed Gelatin Methacryloyl-Based Scaffolds with Potential Application in Tissue Engineering,“ Polymers, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 727,10.3390/polym13050727 ↗
4. Zhou J, Vijayavenkataraman S (2021) “3D-printable conductive materials for tissue engineering and biomedical applications,“ Bioprinting, vol. 24, p. e00166, 2021/12/01/10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00166 ↗
5. Xue P et al (2021) Near-infrared light‐driven shape‐morphing of programmable anisotropic hydrogels enabled by MXene nanosheets. Angew Chem Int Ed 60(7):3390–339610.1002/anie.202014533 ↗
6. Joshi S, Choudhury SB, Gugulothu SS, Visweswariah, Chatterjee K “Strategies to Promote Vascularization in 3D Printed Tissue Scaffolds: Trends and Challenges,“ Biomacromolecules, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 2730–2751, 2022/07/11 202210.1021/acs.biomac.2c00423 ↗
7. Kirchmajer DM, Gorkin Iii R (2015) An overview of the suitability of hydrogel-forming polymers for extrusion-based 3D-printing. J Mater Chem B 3(20):4105–411710.1039/C5TB00393H ↗
8. Wang H, Li X, Li M, Wang S, Zuo A, Guo J (2022) “Bioadhesion design of hydrogels: adhesion strategies and evaluation methods for biological interfaces,“ J Adhes Sci Technol, pp. 1–35,
9. Vázquez-González M, Willner I (2020) Stimuli-Responsive Biomolecule-Based hydrogels and their applications. Angew Chem Int Ed 59(36):15342–1537710.1002/anie.201907670 ↗
10. Díaz-Payno PJ et al (2022) “Swelling-Dependent Shape-Based Transformation of a Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-Laden 4D Bioprinted Construct for Cartilage Tissue Engineering,“ (in eng), Adv Healthc Mater, p. e2201891, Oct 2910.1002/adhm.202201891 ↗
11. Ding et al (2022) “Jammed Micro-Flake Hydrogel for Four-Dimensional Living Cell Bioprinting,“ (in eng), Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), vol. 34, no. 15, p. e2109394,10.1002/adma.202109394 ↗
12. Fonseca C et al “Emulating Human Tissues and Organs: A Bioprinting Perspective Toward Personalized Medicine,“ Chem Rev, vol. 120, no. 19, pp. 11093–11139, 2020/10/14 2020.10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00342 ↗
13. Arif ZU, Khalid MY, Zolfagharian A, Bodaghi M (2022) “4D bioprinting of smart polymers for biomedical applications: recent progress, challenges, and future perspectives,“ Reactive and Functional Polymers, p. 105374,10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2022.105374 ↗
14. Ding SJ, Lee S, Ayyagari R, Tang CT, Huynh, Alsberg E (Jan 2022) 4D biofabrication via instantly generated graded hydrogel scaffolds,“ (in eng). Bioact Mater 7:324–33210.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.05.021 ↗
15. Aytac Z et al (2022) “Innovations in Craniofacial Bone and Periodontal Tissue Engineering - From Electrospinning to Converged Biofabrication,“ (in eng), International materials reviews, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 347–384,10.1080/09506608.2021.1946236 ↗
16. Bedell ML, Navara AM, Du Y, Zhang S, Mikos AG (2020) “Polymeric Syst bioprinting " Chem reviews 120(19):10744–10792
17. Li X et al “Inkjet Bioprinting of Biomaterials,“ (in eng), Chem Rev, vol. 120, no. 19, pp. 10793–10833, Oct 14 2020.10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00008 ↗
18. Dasgupta Q, Black LD III (2019) A fresh slate for 3D bioprinting. Science 365(6452):446–44710.1126/science.aay0478 ↗
19. Chia HN, Wu BM (2015) Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials. J Biol Eng 9(1):1–1410.1186/s13036-015-0001-4 ↗
20. Duocastella M, Colina M, Fernández-Pradas JM, Serra P, Morenza JL (2007) “Study of the laser-induced forward transfer of liquids for laser bioprinting,“ Applied Surface Science, vol. 253, no. 19, pp. 7855–7859, /07/31/ 200710.1016/j.apsusc.2007.02.097 ↗
21. Keriquel V et al (2017) In situ printing of mesenchymal stromal cells, by laser-assisted bioprinting, for in vivo bone regeneration applications. Sci Rep 7(1):1–1010.1038/s41598-017-01914-x ↗
22. Gao Q, Yang X, Zhao G, Jin Y, Ma, Xu F (2016) 4D bioprinting for biomedical applications. Trends Biotechnol 34(9):746–75610.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.004 ↗
23. Murphy SV, De Coppi P, Atala A (Apr 2020) Opportunities and challenges of translational 3D bioprinting,“ (in eng). Nat biomedical Eng 4(4):370–38010.1038/s41551-019-0471-7 ↗
24. Yang F, Tadepalli V, Wiley BJ “3D Printing of a Double Network Hydrogel with a Compression Strength and Elastic Modulus Greater than those of Cartilage,“ (in eng), ACS biomaterials science & engineering, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 863–869, May 8 2017.10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00094 ↗
25. Liu W et al (2017) Extrusion bioprinting of Shear-Thinning gelatin methacryloyl Bioinks. Adv Healthc Mater 6(12):160145110.1002/adhm.201601451 ↗
26. Paxton N, Smolan W, Böck T, Melchels F, Groll J, Jungst T (2017) “Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability,“ Biofabrication, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 044107,10.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd8 ↗
27. Chopin-Doroteo M, Mandujano-Tinoco EA, Krötzsch E (2021) “Tailoring of the rheological properties of bioinks to improve bioprinting and bioassembly for tissue replacement,“ Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, vol. 1865, no. 2, p. 129782, /02/01/ 202110.1016/j.bbagen.2020.129782 ↗
28. Ning L et al (Dec 2020) Biomechanical factors in three-dimensional tissue bioprinting,“ (in eng). Appl Phys Rev 7(4):04131910.1063/5.0023206 ↗
29. Negro T, Cherbuin, Lutolf MP (2018) 3D inkjet printing of complex, cell-laden hydrogel structures. Sci Rep 8(1):1–910.1038/s41598-018-35504-2 ↗
30. Rakin RH et al (2021) “Tunable metacrylated hyaluronic acid-based hybrid bioinks for stereolithography 3D bioprinting,“ Biofabrication, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 044109,10.1088/1758-5090/ac25cb ↗
31. Zheng Z, Eglin D, Alini M, Richards GR, Qin L, Lai Y (2021) “Visible light-induced 3D bioprinting technologies and corresponding bioink materials for tissue engineering: a review,“ Engineering, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 966–978,10.1016/j.eng.2020.05.021 ↗
32. Dou V, Perez J, Qu A, Tsin B, Xu, Li J (2021) A state-of‐the‐art review of laser‐assisted bioprinting and its future research trends. ChemBioEng Reviews 8(5):517–53410.1002/cben.202000037 ↗
33. Murphy SV, Atala A “3D bioprinting of tissues and organs,“ Nat Biotechnol, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 773–785, 2014/08/01 2014.10.1038/nbt.2958 ↗
34. Alonzo M, AnilKumar S, Roman B, Tasnim N, Joddar B (2019) 3D bioprinting of cardiac tissue and cardiac stem cell therapy. Translational Res 211:64–83 2019/09/01/10.1016/j.trsl.2019.04.004 ↗
35. Kim S, Lee JS, Gao G, Cho DW (2017) “Direct 3D cell-printing of human skin with functional transwell system,“ (in eng), Biofabrication, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 025034, Jun 610.1088/1758-5090/aa71c8 ↗
36. Xiong S et al (Jun 27 2017) A Gelatin-sulfonated Silk Composite Scaffold based on 3D Printing Technology Enhances Skin Regeneration by Stimulating Epidermal Growth and Dermal Neovascularization,“ (in eng). Sci Rep 7(1):428810.1038/s41598-017-04149-y ↗
37. Farina M et al (2018) “Transcutaneously refillable, 3D-printed biopolymeric encapsulation system for the transplantation of endocrine cells,“ (in eng), Biomaterials, vol. 177, pp. 125–138, Sep10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.05.047 ↗
38. Ho L, Hsu SH (2018) “Cell reprogramming by 3D bioprinting of human fibroblasts in polyurethane hydrogel for fabrication of neural-like constructs,“ (in eng), Acta Biomater, vol. 70, pp. 57–70, Apr 110.1016/j.actbio.2018.01.044 ↗
39. Zou F, Jiang J, Lv F, Xia X, Ma X (Feb 27 2020) Preparation of antibacterial and osteoconductive 3D-printed PLGA/Cu(I)@ZIF-8 nanocomposite scaffolds for infected bone repair,“ (in eng). J Nanobiotechnol 18(1):3910.1186/s12951-020-00594-6 ↗
40. Byambaa et al (2017) Bioprinted osteogenic and vasculogenic patterns for Engineering 3D bone tissue. Adv Healthc Mater 6(16):170001510.1002/adhm.201700015 ↗
41. Golafshan N et al (2020) “Tough magnesium phosphate-based 3D-printed implants induce bone regeneration in an equine defect model,“ (in eng), Biomaterials, vol. 261, p. 120302, Dec10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120302 ↗
42. Liu B et al (2020) “3D-bioprinted functional and biomimetic hydrogel scaffolds incorporated with nanosilicates to promote bone healing in rat calvarial defect model,“ (in eng), Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications, vol. 112, p. 110905, Jul10.1016/j.msec.2020.110905 ↗
43. Vijayavenkataraman S, Lu WF, Fuh JY “3D bioprinting of skin: a state-of-the-art review on modelling, materials, and processes,“ (in eng), Biofabrication, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 032001, Sep 8 201610.1088/1758-5090/8/3/032001 ↗
44. Alluri R et al (Apr 2018) 3D printed hyperelastic “bone” scaffolds and regional gene therapy: A novel approach to bone healing,“ (in eng). J Biomed Mater Res A 106(4):1104–111010.1002/jbm.a.36310 ↗
45. Dhawan PM, Kennedy EB, Rizk, Ozbolat IT (2019) “Three-dimensional Bioprinting for Bone and Cartilage Restoration in Orthopaedic Surgery,“ (in eng), The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. e215-e226, Mar 110.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00632 ↗
46. Li Y et al (Jul 2020) An effective dual-factor modified 3D-printed PCL scaffold for bone defect repair,“ (in eng). J Biomed Mater Res B 108(5):2167–217910.1002/jbm.b.34555 ↗
47. Chaudhari VS, Malakar TK, Murty US, Banerjee S (2021) “Extruded filaments derived 3D printed medicated skin patch to mitigate destructive pulmonary tuberculosis: design to delivery,“ (in eng), Expert opinion on drug delivery, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 301–313, Feb10.1080/17425247.2021.1845648 ↗
48. Ostrovidov S et al (2019) “3D Bioprinting in Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering,“ Small, vol. 15, no. 24, p. 1805530,10.1002/smll.201805530 ↗
49. Tijore JM, Behr SA, Irvine V, Baisane, Venkatraman S (2018) “Bioprinted gelatin hydrogel platform promotes smooth muscle cell contractile phenotype maintenance,“ (in eng), Biomed Microdevices, vol. 20, no. 2, p. 32, Mar 2810.1007/s10544-018-0274-8 ↗
50. Merceron TK et al (2015) “A 3D bioprinted complex structure for engineering the muscle-tendon unit,“ (in eng), Biofabrication, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 035003, Jun 1710.1088/1758-5090/7/3/035003 ↗
51. Laternser S, Keller H, Leupin O, Rausch M, Graf-Hausner U, Rimann M (2018) “A Novel Microplate 3D Bioprinting Platform for the Engineering of Muscle and Tendon Tissues,“ (in eng), SLAS technology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 599–613, Dec10.1177/2472630318776594 ↗
52. Alaee F et al (2014) “Evaluation of the effects of systemic treatment with a sclerostin neutralizing antibody on bone repair in a rat femoral defect model,“ (in eng), Journal of orthopaedic research: official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 197–203, Feb10.1002/jor.22498 ↗
53. Dhawan PM, Kennedy EB, Rizk, Ozbolat IT “Three-dimensional bioprinting for bone and cartilage restoration in orthopaedic surgery,“ JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. e215-e226, 2019.10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00632 ↗
54. Gao G et al (2015) Improved properties of bone and cartilage tissue from 3D inkjet-bioprinted human mesenchymal stem cells by simultaneous deposition and photocrosslinking in PEG-GelMA. Biotechnol Lett 37(11):2349–235510.1007/s10529-015-1921-2 ↗
55. Dang TT, Hwang CH, Back SH, Koo K-i (2020) “Coaxial printing of double-layered and free-standing blood vessel analogues without ultraviolet illumination for high-volume vascularised tissue,“ Biofabrication, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 045033,10.1088/1758-5090/abafc6 ↗
56. Cho J et al (2016) “Development of a 3D cell printed construct considering angiogenesis for liver tissue engineering. Biofabrication 8 (1),“ ed: IOP Publishing,10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/015007 ↗
57. Lee H et al “Development of Liver Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Bioink for Three-Dimensional Cell Printing-Based Liver Tissue Engineering,“ Biomacromolecules, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1229–1237, 2017/04/10 201710.1021/acs.biomac.6b01908 ↗
58. Heo N, Lee S-J, Timsina R, Qiu X, Castro NJ, Zhang LG (2019) Development of 3D printable conductive hydrogel with crystallized PEDOT: PSS for neural tissue engineering. Mater Sci Engineering: C 99:582–59010.1016/j.msec.2019.02.008 ↗
59. Zhu W, Harris BT, Zhang LG (2016) “Gelatin methacrylamide hydrogel with graphene nanoplatelets for neural cell-laden 3D bioprinting,“ in 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2016: IEEE, pp. 4185–418810.1109/EMBC.2016.7591649 ↗
60. Wang Z et al “Visible Light Photoinitiation of Cell-Adhesive Gelatin Methacryloyl Hydrogels for Stereolithography 3D Bioprinting,“ ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, vol. 10, no. 32, pp. 26859–26869, 2018/08/15 2018.10.1021/acsami.8b06607 ↗
61. Feng Z et al (2019) “Graphene-reinforced biodegradable resin composites for stereolithographic 3D printing of bone structure scaffolds,“ Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 201910.1155/2019/9710264 ↗
62. Melchels P, Feijen J, Grijpma DW (2010) “A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering,“ Biomaterials, vol. 31, no. 24, pp. 6121–6130,10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050 ↗
63. Vijayavenkataraman S, Lu W, Fuh J (2016) “3D bioprinting of skin: a state-of-the-art review on modelling, materials, and processes,“ Biofabrication, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 032001,10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/032001 ↗
64. Liu H et al (2020) Delivering proangiogenic factors from 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffolds for vascularized bone regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater 9(23):200072710.1002/adhm.202000727 ↗
65. Li N, Guo R, Zhang ZJ (2021) Bioink formulations for bone tissue regeneration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 9:63048810.3389/fbioe.2021.630488 ↗
66. Yuk H, Lin S, Ma C, Takaffoli M, Fang NX, Zhao X “Hydraulic hydrogel actuators and robots optically and sonically camouflaged in water,“ Nat Commun, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 14230, 2017/02/01 2017.10.1038/ncomms14230 ↗
67. Jeon S-J, Hauser AW, Hayward RC (2017) Shape-morphing materials from stimuli-responsive hydrogel hybrids. Acc Chem Res 50(2):161–16910.1021/acs.accounts.6b00570 ↗
68. Zhao Q, Liang Y, Ren L, Yu Z, Zhang Z, Ren L (2018) Bionic intelligent hydrogel actuators with multimodal deformation and locomotion. Nano Energy 51:621–631 2018/09/01/10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.025 ↗
69. Zhang L, Chizhik S, Wen Y, Naumov P (2016) Directed Motility of Hygroresponsive Biomimetic Actuators. Adv Funct Mater 26(7):1040–105310.1002/adfm.201503922 ↗
70. Yasa C, Tabak AF, Yasa O, Ceylan H, Sitti M (2019) 3D-Printed microrobotic transporters with recapitulated stem cell niche for programmable and active cell delivery. Adv Funct Mater 29(17):180899210.1002/adfm.201808992 ↗
71. Ceylan H, Yasa IC, Yasa O, Tabak AF, Giltinan J, Sitti M “3D-Printed Biodegradable Microswimmer for Theranostic Cargo Delivery and Release,“ ACS Nano, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 3353–3362, 2019/03/26 2019.10.1021/acsnano.8b09233 ↗
72. Gao et al “Synergistic pH and Temperature-Driven Actuation of Poly(NIPAM-co-DMAPMA)/Clay Nanocomposite Hydrogel Bilayers,“ ACS Omega, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 17914–17921, 2018/12/31 2018.10.1021/acsomega.8b02979 ↗
73. Cao Y et al (2020) Three-dimensional printed multiphasic scaffolds with stratified cell-laden gelatin methacrylate hydrogels for biomimetic tendon-to-bone interface engineering. J Orthop Translation 23:89–100 2020/07/01/10.1016/j.jot.2020.01.004 ↗
74. Ionov L (2014) Hydrogel-based actuators: possibilities and limitations. Mater Today 17(10):494–503 2014/12/01/10.1016/j.mattod.2014.07.002 ↗
75. Morales E, Palleau MD, Dickey, Velev OD (2014) Electro-actuated hydrogel walkers with dual responsive legs. Soft Matter 10(9):1337–134810.1039/C3SM51921J ↗
76. Yue M, Hoshino Y, Ohshiro Y, Imamura K, Miura Y (2014) “Temperature-responsive microgel films as reversible carbon dioxide absorbents in wet environment,“ Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 2654–2657,10.1002/anie.201309758 ↗
77. Shang, Theato P (2018) Smart composite hydrogel with pH-, ionic strength- and temperature-induced actuation,“ (in eng). Soft Matter 14(41):8401–840710.1039/C8SM01728J ↗
78. Mishra K et al (2020) Autonomic perspiration in 3D-printed hydrogel actuators. Sci Rob 5(38):eaaz391810.1126/scirobotics.aaz3918 ↗
79. Chen T, Bakhshi H, Liu L, Ji J, Agarwal S (2018) Combining 3D printing with electrospinning for rapid response and enhanced designability of hydrogel actuators. Adv Funct Mater 28(19):180051410.1002/adfm.201800514 ↗
80. Shin M, Song KH, Burrell JC, Cullen DK, Burdick JA (2019) Injectable and Conductive Granular Hydrogels for 3D Printing and Electroactive tissue support. Adv Sci 6(20):190122910.1002/advs.201901229 ↗
81. Rosales CAG et al (2018) 3D printing of shape memory polymer (SMP)/carbon black (CB) nanocomposites with electro-responsive toughness enhancement. Mater Res Express 5(6):06570410.1088/2053-1591/aacd53 ↗
82. Sayyar S et al “UV Cross-Linkable Graphene/Poly(trimethylene Carbonate) Composites for 3D Printing of Electrically Conductive Scaffolds,“ ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, vol. 8, no. 46, pp. 31916–31925, 2016/11/23 2016.10.1021/acsami.6b09962 ↗
83. Servant C, Bussy K, Al-Jamal, Kostarelos K (2013) Design, engineering and structural integrity of electro-responsive carbon nanotube-based hydrogels for pulsatile drug release. J Mater Chem B 1(36):4593–460010.1039/c3tb20614a ↗
84. Ahadian S et al (2017) Moldable elastomeric polyester-carbon nanotube scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 52:81–9110.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.009 ↗
85. Baei P, Jalili-Firoozinezhad S, Rajabi-Zeleti S, Tafazzoli-Shadpour M, Baharvand H, Aghdami N (2016) Electrically conductive gold nanoparticle-chitosan thermosensitive hydrogels for cardiac tissue engineering. Mater Sci Engineering: C 63:131–14110.1016/j.msec.2016.02.056 ↗
86. Dong S-L, Han L, Du C-X, Wang X-Y, Li L-H, Wei Y (2017) 3D Printing of Aniline Tetramer-Grafted-polyethylenimine and Pluronic F127 Composites for Electroactive Scaffolds. Macromol Rapid Commun 38(4):160055110.1002/marc.201600551 ↗
87. "Three-Dimensional Printing and Injectable Conductive Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Application,“ (2019) Tissue Eng Part B: Reviews 25(5):398–41110.1089/ten.teb.2019.0100 ↗
88. Maraveas C, Bayer IS, Bartzanas T (2022) “4D printing: Perspectives for the production of sustainable plastics for agriculture,“ Biotechnology Advances, vol. 54, p. 107785, /01/01/ 202210.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107785 ↗
89. de Haan T, Verjans JM, Broer DJ, Bastiaansen CW, Schenning AP (2014) Humidity-responsive liquid crystalline polymer actuators with an asymmetry in the molecular trigger that bend, fold, and curl. J Am Chem Soc 136(30):10585–1058810.1021/ja505475x ↗
90. Zhang Y, Yin X-Y, Zheng M, Moorlag C, Yang J, Wang ZL (2019) 3D printing of thermoreversible polyurethanes with targeted shape memory and precise in situ self-healing properties. J Mater Chem A 7(12):6972–698410.1039/C8TA12428K ↗
91. Gelebart H, Mulder DJ, Vantomme G, Schenning AP, Broer DJ (2017) “A Rewritable, Reprogrammable, Dual Light-Responsive Polymer Actuator,“ Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 56, no. 43, pp. 13436–13439,10.1002/anie.201706793 ↗
92. Leist SK, Zhou J (2016) Current status of 4D printing technology and the potential of light-reactive smart materials as 4D printable materials. Virtual and Physical Prototyping 11(4):249–26210.1080/17452759.2016.1198630 ↗
93. Brown TE, Anseth KS (2017) Spatiotemporal hydrogel biomaterials for regenerative medicine. Chem Soc Rev 46(21):6532–655210.1039/C7CS00445A ↗
94. Wei Q, Zhang Y, Yao L, Liu Y, Liu, Leng J “Direct-Write Fabrication of 4D Active Shape-Changing Structures Based on a Shape Memory Polymer and Its Nanocomposite,“ ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 876–883, 2017/01/11 2017.10.1021/acsami.6b12824 ↗
95. Zhao Z, Wu J, Mu X, Chen H, Qi HJ, Fang D (2017) Origami by frontal photopolymerization. Sci Adv 3(4):e160232610.1126/sciadv.1602326 ↗
96. Cui et al (2020) 4D physiologically adaptable cardiac patch: a 4-month in vivo study for the treatment of myocardial infarction. Sci Adv 6(26):eabb506710.1126/sciadv.abb5067 ↗
97. Miao S et al (2018) Stereolithographic 4D bioprinting of Multiresponsive Architectures for neural Engineering. Adv Biosystems 2(9):180010110.1002/adbi.201800101 ↗
98. Rajabi M, McConnell J, Cabral, Ali MA (2021) Chitosan hydrogels in 3D printing for biomedical applications. Carbohydr Polym 260:117768 2021/05/15/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117768 ↗
99. Yu C, Zhu W, Sun B, Mei D, Gou M, Chen S (2018) Modulating physical, chemical, and biological properties in 3D printing for tissue engineering applications. Appl Phys reviews 5(4):04110710.1063/1.5050245 ↗
100. Li Y-C, Zhang YS, Akpek A, Shin SR, Khademhosseini A (2016) “4D bioprinting: the next-generation technology for biofabrication enabled by stimuli-responsive materials,“ Biofabrication, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 012001,10.1088/1758-5090/9/1/012001 ↗