Evolving Yield Loci Based on Anisotropic Hardening Curves
Source abstract
Abstract
The widely accepted concept of isotropic hardening implies that the ratio between a stress for any straight strain path and the reference flow stress remains constant. Measured hardening curves of for instance bake hardening and dual phase steels show however that these ratio are not always constant. To capture this phenomenon in finite element simulations the concept of an evolving yield locus is proposed. A finite difference model for the simulation of axisymmetric sheet forming processes is used to implement this model. Simulation results show that there is a major impact of the yield locus evolution. The reliability of simulation results with isotropic hardening can be significantly improved if the shape of the yield locus is fitted to an average taking all measured data of the hardening curves into account.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (4)
Show source-provided references
1. L. Kessler, H. Richter, K. Roll and A. Faust. A contribution on yield loci modeling compared to the application of variable hardening curves in forming simulations. In M. Tisza (ed.), Forming the future, Proceedings of IDDRG 2007, 101-107. University of Miskolc, 2007.
2. H. Dell, H. Gese and G. Oberhofer. Advanced yield loci and anisotropic hardening in the material model MF GenYld + CrachFEM. In P. Hora (ed.), Proceedings of Numisheet 2008, 49-54. Interlaken, 2008.
3. P. van Liempt. Workhardening and substructural geometry of metals. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 45: 459-464, 1994.10.1016/0924-0136(94)90382-4 ↗
4. H. Vegter and A.H. van den Boogaard. A plane stress yield function for anisotropic sheet material by interpolation of biaxial stress states. International Journal of Plasticity, 22: 557–580, 2006.10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.04.009 ↗