Multiscale Evaluation of Jaw Geometry Reproduction Obtained Via the Use of Selected Orthodontic Materials in Dental Implants and Orthodontics—In Vitro Case Study
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, the multiscale analysis of the reproduction accuracy of jaw geometry obtained via the use of selected orthodontic materials is discussed. Impressions were made from two types of impression material. An accuracy assessment of the model geometry mapping was performed using noncontact systems, including a fringe projection optical 3D scanner, computed tomography, and a focus variation microscope. Measurements were made in three modes for comparison, as were the silicone and polyether impression materials. These modes were a jaw model and impression, an impression and plaster model, and plaster and jaw models. The research results are presented as colorful maps of deviations. Data analysis showed that deviations were the smallest in the case of silicone and that the best fit occurred between the silicone impression and the plaster model. The conducted research confirmed the validity of the assumptions considering the use of multiscale analysis for geometric analysis. The use of modern multiscale measurement methods allows for shorter and more efficient prosthetic operations. At present, these devices are expensive and complicated to use, but developments in technology should simplify the process, and prosthetic professionals should be aware of the possibilities described in the paper.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Anatomy and Medical Technology · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Metrology and Measurement Systems, Institute of Mechanical Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, 5 M. Skłodowska-Curie Square, 60-965 Poznan, Poland
Funding
Ministry of Education and Science in Poland
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Optical 3D scans for orthodontic diagnostics performed on full-arch impressions. Completeness of surface structure representation10.1007/s00056-015-0309-1 ↗
2. Improvement and Application of Mass Spring Model in Simulation of Gingi-val Soft Tissue Deformation
3. Palczewska-Komsa, M.O., Gapiński, B., and Nowicka, A. (2022). The Influence of New Bioactive Materials on Pulp-Dentin Complex Regeneration in the Assessment of Cone Bone Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Computed Micro-Tomography (Micro-CT) from a Present and Future Perspective—A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med., 11.10.3390/jcm11113091 ↗
4. Dobrzanski, L.A., and Dobrzanski, L.B. (2020). Dentistry 4.0 Concept in the Design and Manufacturing of Prosthetic Dental Restorations. Processes, 8.10.3390/pr8050525 ↗
5. The Evolution of Dental Materials for Hybrid Prosthesis10.2174/1874210601408010085 ↗
6. Multibracket appliance: Impression defaults and their reduction by blocking-out—A three-dimensional study10.1007/s00784-015-1514-4 ↗
7. Dimensional stability of contemporary irreversible hydrocolloids: Humidor versus wet tissue storage10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60117-6 ↗
8. Accuracy of stone casts obtained by different impression materials10.1590/S1806-83242008000400002 ↗
9. Does the contact time of alginate with plaster cast influence its properties?10.1590/S1806-83242012005000005 ↗
10. Alginate impressions: A practical perspective10.4103/0972-0707.43416 ↗
11. Irreversible hydrocolloid and gypsum interactions
12. Accuracy of intraoral scans in the mixed dentition: A prospective non-randomized comparative clinical trial10.1186/s13005-020-00222-6 ↗
13. Intraoral 3D scanning or dental impressions for the assessment of dental arch relationships in cleft care: Which is superior?10.1597/15-036 ↗
14. Distortion of CAD-CAM-fabricated implant-fixed titanium and zirconia complete dental prosthesis frameworks10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.02.003 ↗
15. Accuracy and reproducibility of virtual edentulous casts created by laboratory impression scan protocols10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.11.024 ↗
16. Nagata, K., Fuchigami, K., Okuhama, Y., Wakamori, K., Tsuruoka, H., Nakashizu, T., Hoshi, N., Atsumi, M., Kimoto, K., and Kawana, H. (2021). Comparison of digital and silicone impressions for single-tooth implants and two and three-unit implants for a free-end edentulous saddle. BMC Oral Health, 21.10.1186/s12903-021-01836-1 ↗
17. A comparison of patient experience, chair-side time, accuracy of dental arch measurements and costs of acquisition of dental models10.2319/020619-84.1 ↗
18. Anterior teeth root inclination prediction derived from digital models: A comparative study of plaster study casts and CBCT images
19. Orthodontic scanners: What is available?10.1179/1465313315Y.0000000001 ↗
20. Comparison of scanning times for different dental cast materials using an intraoral scanner10.1016/j.ejwf.2017.01.002 ↗
21. Recent advances in imaging technologies in dentistry10.4329/wjr.v6.i10.794 ↗
22. Palone, M. (2021). Recent Advances in the Treatment of Orofacial Clefts, IntechOpen.
23. Pereira, M.M.A., Dini, C., Souza, J.G.S., Barão, V.A.R., and de Avila, E.D. (J. Prosthet. Dent., 2022). Industry support for dental implant research: A metatrend study of industry partnership in the development of new technologies, J. Prosthet. Dent., in press.10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.026 ↗
24. Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: Time and patient satisfaction10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.017 ↗
25. Comparison of the Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Printed Casts, Digital, and Conventional Casts: An In Vitro Study10.1055/s-0040-1705243 ↗
26. Ahn, J.S., Park, A., Kim, J.W., Lee, B.H., and Eom, J.B. (2017). Development of Three-Dimensional Dental Scanning Apparatus Using Structured Illumination. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17071634 ↗
27. Current status and applications of 3D scanning in dentistry10.1016/j.cegh.2018.07.005 ↗
28. Micro-CT analysis of the rodent jaw bone micro-architecture: A systematic review10.1016/j.bonr.2014.10.005 ↗
29. Influence of implant surface topography on early osseointegration: A histological study in human jaws10.1002/jbm.b.30608 ↗
30. Uklejewski, R., Winiecki, M., Patalas, A., and Rogala, P. (2021). Bone Density Micro-CT Assessment during Embedding of the Innovative Multi-Spiked Connecting Scaffold in Periarticular Bone to Elaborate a Validated Numerical Model for Designing Biomimetic Fixation of Resurfacing Endoprostheses. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14061384 ↗
31. Emara, A., Sharma, S., Halbeisen, F.S., Msallem, B., and Thieringer, F.M. (2020). Comparative evaluation of digitization of diagnostic dental cast (plaster) models using different scanning technologies. Dent. J., 8.10.3390/dj8030079 ↗
32. Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.02.008 ↗
33. Precision of guided scanning procedures for full-arch digital impressions in vivo10.1007/s00056-017-0103-3 ↗
34. Impression material accuracy for palatal orthodontic miniscrews10.1007/s00056-020-00245-3 ↗
35. Accuracy of Dental Monitoring 3D digital dental models using photograph and video mode10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.02.014 ↗
36. Industry 4.010.1007/s12599-014-0334-4 ↗
37. A validation study of reconstructed rapid prototyping models produced by two technologies10.2319/01091-727.1 ↗
38. Computerized Casts for Orthodontic Purpose Using Powder-Free Intraoral Scanners: Accuracy, Execution Time, and Patient Feedback10.1155/2018/4103232 ↗
39. Kroma, A., Mendak, M., Jakubowicz, M., Gapiński, B., and Popielarski, P. (2021). Non-Contact Multiscale Analysis of a DPP 3D-Printed Injection Die for Investment Casting. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14226758 ↗
40. Comparison of reconstructed rapid prototyping models produced by 3-dimensional printing and conventional stone models with different degrees of crowding10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.08.019 ↗
41. Current Products and Practices OrthoCADTM: Digital models for a digital era10.1179/146531204225026679 ↗
42. Evaluation of three-dimensional printed virtual setups10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.08.017 ↗
43. Suitability of virtual plaster models superimposed with the lateral cephalogram for guided paramedian orthodontic mini-implant placement with regard to the bone support10.1007/s00056-020-00238-2 ↗
44. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models
45. Tooth segmentation and gingival tissue deformation framework for 3D orthodontic treatment planning and evaluating10.1007/s11517-020-02230-9 ↗
46. Assessment of selected metrological properties of laser triangulation sensors10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109190 ↗
47. Accuracy of a three-dimensional dentition model digitized from an interocclusal record using a non-contact surface scanner10.1093/ejo/cjv065 ↗
48. Variation of orthodontic treatment decision-making based on dental model type: A systematic review
49. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.044 ↗
50. Fusion of intra-oral scans in cone-beam computed tomography scans10.1007/s00784-020-03336-y ↗
51. Application of the computed tomography to control parts made on additive manufacturing process10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.645 ↗
52. Prakoso, A.T., Basri, H., Adanta, D., Yani, I., Ammarullah, M.I., Akbar, I., Ghazali, F.A., Syahrom, A., and Kamarul, T. (2023). The Effect of Tortuosity on Permeability of Porous Scaffold. Biomedicines, 11.10.3390/biomedicines11020427 ↗
53. A digital approach to the evaluation of mandibular position by using a virtual articulator10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.002 ↗
54. Dąbrowski, M., Rogala, P., Uklejewski, R., Patalas, A., Winiecki, M., and Gapiński, B. (2021). Subchondral Bone Relative Area and Density in Human Osteoarthritic Femoral Heads Assessed with Micro-CT before and after Mechanical Embedding of the Innovative Multi-Spiked Connecting Scaffold for Resurfacing THA Endoprostheses: A Pilot Study. J. Clin. Med., 10.10.3390/jcm10132937 ↗
55. Gapinski, B., Wieczorowski, M., Mietliński, P., and Mathia, T.G. (2022). Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Springer.
56. Wieczorowski, M., Yago, I.P., Alejandro, P.D., Gapiński, B., Budzik, G., and Diering, M. (2022). Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Springer.
57. Micro-CT analysis of molar teeth restored by combining conventional and glass fibre reinforced composites
58. Schmeidl, K., Wieczorowski, M., Grocholewicz, K., Mendak, M., and Janiszewska Olszowska, J. (2021). Frictional properties of the tinbtazro orthodontic wire—A laboratory comparison to popular archwires. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14216233 ↗