journal article·2009-08

Die surface design optimization accommodating springback assisted by an automatic surface generator

Waluyo A. Siswanto, Badrul Omar

Publisher page

Abstract

One of manufacturing problems in sheet metal forming is springback. This elastic recovery occurs when unloading the formed part off the tooling dies, resulting in shape inaccuracies. Optimizing the geometry surfaces of the tools can be used to accommodate the springback, so that after the unloading process, the formed part meets the target shape. This paper presents an optimization method to modify the geometry surfaces of the tooling dies based on springforward simulations assisted by an automatic surface generator during the process. In the optimization cycle, new sets of upper and lower die surfaces are required. An automatic surface generation method based on normal vector has been developed to create new finite elements of the new surfaces. The normal vector calculation of the deformed elements after springback generates new upper and lower surfaces with uniform gaps. The new generated elements can be used directly during the optimization cycle. For testing and verification purposes, the method is applied in various complicated surfaces. The test results show that this method is able to generate a uniform gap in a corner with 90 degrees angle, without discontinuity in any elements. The application in optimization to minimize the springback is conducted in hat- shape problem. The result shows that the automatic mesh generator works effectively during the optimization cycle. The distortion error after springback can be significantly minimized.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Laser and Thermal Forming Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (9)

Show source-provided references
1. Tufekci SS, Wang CT, Kinzel GL, Altan T (1994) Estimation and control of drawbead forces in sheet metal forming. SAE No.94094110.4271/940941 ↗
2. Ahmetoglu M, Broek TR, Kinzel G, Altan T (1995) Control of blank holder force to eliminate wrinkling and fracture in deep-drawing rectangular parts. An- nals of the CIRP, 44(1)10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62318-X ↗
3. He N, Wagoner RH (1996) Springback simulation in sheet metal forming. In NUMISHEET 1996, pp 308–315
4. Karafillis AP, Boyce MC (1992) Tooling design in sheet metal forming using springback calculation. Int J Mech Sci 34(2):113–13110.1016/0020-7403(92)90077-T ↗
5. Karafillis AP, Boyce MC (1996) Tooling and binder design for sheet metal forming processes compensat- ing springback error. International Journal Machine Tools Manufacturing 36(4):503–52610.1016/0890-6955(95)00023-2 ↗
6. Wu L, Du C, Zhang L (1995) Iterative fem die surface design to compensate for springback in sheet metal stamping. In simulation of materials processing: theory, methods, and applications, NUMIFORM-1995, pp 637–641
7. Shu J, Hung C (1996) Finite element analysis and op- timization of springback reduction: The double bend technique. Int J Mach Tools Manufacturing 36(4):423–43410.1016/0890-6955(95)00072-0 ↗
8. Gan W, Wagoner RH (2004) Die design method for sheet springback. Int J Mech Sci 46:1097–1113 ISSN 0020-740310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.06.006 ↗
9. Siswanto WA, Tomas JA, Mahdavian SM (2000) Tooling geometry optimization in sheet metal forming using springforward simulation. In Iranian Society of Mechanical Engineer (ISME), number Paper E.4168