journal article·2026-03Open access

A novel approach for fabricating tubes with variable wall thicknesses in hollow sinking

Takuma Kishimoto, Hisashi Sato

Abstract

Abstract Variable wall-thickness tubes are increasingly required for lightweight, functionally optimized structures and heat-transfer components, yet conventional hollow sinking with a constant speed ratio between the feeding and drawing sides produces an almost uniform wall thickness along the tube axis and cannot generate a taper. This study proposes a simple hollow sinking process for fabricating variable wall-thickness microtubes without an inner tool by controlling the speed ratio between the feeding and drawing sides, that is, by increasing the drawing speed during processing while keeping the feeding speed at the die entrance constant. Austenitic stainless-steel (SUS304) tubes with an outer diameter of 2.0 mm, an inner diameter of 1.82 mm, and an initial wall thickness of 0.09 mm were drawn under these conditions, where the drawing speed on the exit side was continuously increased while the feeding speed was fixed. The resulting wall-thickness distributions and surface roughness were evaluated experimentally and by finite-element analysis, which consistently showed that the increasing speed ratio enhances the axial elongation per unit time beneath and just after the die, thereby geometrically introducing a taper slope on the inner wall. Using this method, tubes with a maximum wall-thickness difference of about 40% between thick and thin sections were fabricated while maintaining acceptable outer and inner surface quality. These results demonstrate that variable-thickness microtubes can be intentionally produced in hollow sinking through simple control of the speed ratio between the feeding and drawing sides, extending the conventional geometric framework for straight tubes to tapered tubes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Heat Transfer and Optimization · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Injection Molding Process and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Guillot M, Fafard M, Girard S, Rahem A, D’Amours G (2010) Experimental exploration of the aluminum tube drawing process for producing variable wall thickness components used in light structural applications. SAE Tech Pap. https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-022210.4271/2010-01-0222 ↗
2. Abah C, Lawson JP, Chitale R, Simaan N (2024) Self-steering catheters for neuroendovascular interventions. IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics 6:1726–1737. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMRB.2024.346412310.1109/TMRB.2024.3464123 ↗
3. Han S, Woo Y, Hwang T, Oh I, Moon YH (2019) Tailor layered tube hydroforming for fabricating tubular parts with dissimilar thickness. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 138:51–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2018.11.00510.1016/j.ijmachtools.2018.11.005 ↗
4. Chu GN, Liu G, Liu WJ, Yuan SJ (2012) An approach to improve thickness uniformity within tailor-welded tube hydroforming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60:1247–1253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3792-610.1007/s00170-011-3792-6 ↗
5. Bihamta R, D’Amours G, Bui QH et al (2013) Numerical and experimental studies on the new design concept of hydroforming dies for complex tubes. Mater Des 47:766–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.07510.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.075 ↗
6. Bihamta R, Bui QH, Guillot M et al (2015) Global optimisation of the production of complex aluminium tubes by the hydroforming process. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 9:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2015.02.00110.1016/j.cirpj.2015.02.001 ↗
7. Negendank M, Taparli UA, Gall S, Müller S, Reimers W (2016) Microstructural evolution of indirectly extruded seamless 6xxx aluminum tubes with axial variable wall thickness. J Mater Process Technol 230:187–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.11.02410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.11.024 ↗
8. Bihamta R, Bui QH, Guillot M et al (2011) A new method for production of variable thickness aluminum tubes: numerical and experimental studies. J Mater Process Technol 211:578–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.11.01210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.11.012 ↗
9. Bihamta R, Bui QH, Guillot M et al (2012) Application of a new procedure for the optimization of variable thickness drawing of aluminium tubes. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 5:142–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2012.03.00610.1016/j.cirpj.2012.03.006 ↗
10. Bihamta R, D’Amours G, Bui QH et al (2010) Optimization on the production of variable thickness aluminum tubes int manuf sci eng Conf MSEC 2010 1. ASME. 633–640. https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2010-3414510.1115/MSEC2010-34145 ↗
11. Bui QH, Pham XT, Fafard M (2013) Modelling of microstructure effects on the mechanical behavior of aluminium tubes drawn with different reduction areas. Int J Plast 50:127–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.04.00510.1016/j.ijplas.2013.04.005 ↗
12. Suliga M, Mróz S, Szota P, Wasilewski M, Jaroszewski K (2025) Numerical analysis of the process of drawing thin-walled CuSn8 alloy tubes on a cylindrical plug. Mater (Basel) 18:2754. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1812275410.3390/ma18122754 ↗
13. Li W, Liu S, Feng P, Zhou J, Wang B (2023) Relative position of plug and die on forming accuracy of shaped tube by cold drawing. J Phys : Conf Ser 2437. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2437/1/01209610.1088/1742-6596/2437/1/012096 ↗
14. Yoshida K, Furuya H (2004) Mandrel drawing and plug drawing of shape-memory-alloy fine tubes used in catheters and stents. J Mater Process Technol 153:145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.18210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.182 ↗
15. Yoshida K, Watanabe M, Ishikawa H (2001) Drawing of Ni-Ti shape-memory-alloy fine tubes used in medical tests. J Mater Process Technol 118:251–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00930-X10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00930-X ↗
16. Kishimoto T, Gondo S, Takemoto K, Tashima K, Suzuki S (2019) Conditions for wall thickness reduction in hollow sinking of SUS304 tubes with drawing speed control in entrance and exit sides of die. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 141:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404471010.1115/1.4044710 ↗
17. Kishimoto T, Nozawa S, Furushima T (2023) Deformation behavior of β titanium alloy tubes in die-less forming with taper shape control. J Mater Res Technol 26:9499–9508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.20210.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.202 ↗
18. Kishimoto T, Sakaguchi H, Suematsu S et al (2020) Deformation behavior causing excessive thinning of outer diameter of micro metal tubes in Hollow sinking. Metals 10:1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1010131510.3390/met10101315 ↗
19. Kishimoto T, Norizuki K, Sato H (2025) Suppression of inner surface roughening during hollow sinking of SUS304 stainless-steel tubes with {111} fiber texture. J Mater Res Technol 36:182–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.03.05210.1016/j.jmrt.2025.03.052 ↗
20. Reddy BV, Kondayya D, Goud EV, Reddy PV (2021) Yield criterion influence on the formability prediction of SS 304 by tensile tests and bulge tests during tube hydroforming process. Multiscale Multidiscip Model Exp Des 4:293–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41939-021-00096-410.1007/s41939-021-00096-4 ↗
21. Dodyim N, Yoshida K, Murata T, Kobayashi Y (2020) Drawing of magnesium fine wire and medical application of drawn wire. Procedia Manuf 50:271–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.08.05010.1016/j.promfg.2020.08.050 ↗
22. Cui B, Wan M, Zhao R, Meng B (2020) Mechanism study and optimized technology of multi-pass drawing process for ultrafine-grained inconel 718 micro-tubes. Mater Trans 61:234–238. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.MT-ML201900110.2320/matertrans.MT-ML2019001 ↗
23. Kishimoto T, Furushima T (2023) Achieving thin wall and high surface quality of magnesium alloy tubes in combined process of Hollow sinking after die-less mandrel drawing. Int J Mater Form 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-023-01750-710.1007/s12289-023-01750-7 ↗
24. Kishimoto T, Sakaguchi H, Suematsu S et al (2020) Outer diameter and surface quality of micro metal tubes in Hollow sinking. Procedia Manuf 47:217–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.19210.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.192 ↗
25. Kishimoto T, Suematsu S, Sakaguchi H et al (2021) Effect of crystal orientation on inner surface roughness of micro metal tubes in Hollow sinking. Mater Sci Eng A 805:140792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14079210.1016/j.msea.2021.140792 ↗
26. Inakazu N, Kaneno Y, Inoue H (1994) Fiber texture formation and mechanical properties in drawn fine copper wire. Mater Sci Forum 157:715–720. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.157-162.71510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.157-162.715 ↗