journal article·2022-11-11Open access

Fully Attentional Network for Low-Resource Academic Machine Translation and Post Editing

İlhami Sel, Davut Hanbay

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 22

Abstract

English is accepted as an academic language in the world. This necessitates the use of English in their academic studies for speakers of other languages. Even when these researchers are competent in the use of the English language, some mistakes may occur while writing an academic article. To solve this problem, academicians tend to use automatic translation programs or get assistance from people with an advanced level of English. This study offers an expert system to enable assistance to the researchers throughout their academic article writing process. In this study, Turkish which is considered among low-resource languages is used as the source language. The proposed model combines the transformer encoder-decoder architecture model with the pre-trained Sci-BERT language model via the shallow fusion method. The model uses a Fully Attentional Network Layer instead of a Feed-Forward Network Layer in the known shallow fusion method. In this way, a higher success rate could be achieved by increasing the attention at the word level. Different metrics were used to evaluate the created model. The model created as a result of the experiments reached 45.1 BLEU and 73.2 METEOR scores. In addition, the proposed model achieved 20.12 and 20.56 scores, respectively, with the zero-shot translation method in the World Machine Translation (2017–2018) test datasets. The proposed method could inspire other low-resource languages to include the language model in the translation system. In this study, a corpus composed entirely of academic sentences is also introduced to be used in the translation system. The corpus consists of 1.2 million parallel sentences. The proposed model and corpus are made available to researchers on our GitHub page.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Language Processing Techniques · Topic Modeling · Multimodal Machine Learning Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Inonu University, Malatya 44200, Turkey

Funding

Inonu University

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., and Bengio, Y. (2014). Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. arXiv.
2. Barrault, L., Bojar, O., Costa-Jussa, M.R., Federmann, C., Fishel, M., Graham, Y., Haddow, B., Huck, M., Koehn, P., and Malmasi, S. (2019, January 1–2). Findings of the 2019 conference on machine translation (wmt19). Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Machine Translation (Volume 2: Shared Task Papers, Day 1), Florence, Italy.10.18653/v1/W19-5301 ↗
3. Li, F., Zhu, J., Yan, H., and Zhang, Z. (2022). Grammatically Derived Factual Relation Augmented Neural Machine Translation. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12136518 ↗
4. Nakazawa, T., Yaguchi, M., Uchimoto, K., Utiyama, M., Sumita, E., Kurohashi, S., and Isahara, H. (2016, January 23–28). Aspec: Asian scientific paper excerpt corpus. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’16), Portorož, Slovenia.
5. Neves, M., Yepes, A.J., and Névéol, A. (2016, January 23–28). The scielo corpus: A parallel corpus of scientific publications for biomedicine. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’16), Portorož, Slovenia.
6. Neural machine translation: A review10.1613/jair.1.12007 ↗
7. Cho, K., Van Merriënboer, B., Bahdanau, D., and Bengio, Y. (2014). On the properties of neural machine translation: Encoder-decoder approaches. arXiv.10.3115/v1/W14-4012 ↗
8. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, Ł., and Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 30.
9. Ranathunga, S., Lee, E.S.A., Skenduli, M.P., Shekhar, R., Alam, M., and Kaur, R. (2021). Neural machine translation for low-resource languages: A survey. arXiv.
10. Wu, S., and Dredze, M. (2019, January 3–7). Beto, Bentz, Becas: The Surprising Cross-Lingual Effectiveness of BERT. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), Hong Kong, China.10.18653/v1/D19-1077 ↗
11. Wang, Z., Mayhew, S., and Roth, D. (2020, January 26–30). Cross-Lingual Ability of Multilingual BERT: An Empirical Study. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
12. Chi, E.A., Hewitt, J., and Manning, C.D. (2020, January 5–10). Finding Universal Grammatical Relations in Multilingual BERT. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Association for Computational Linguistics, Online.10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.493 ↗
13. BERT syntactic transfer: A computational experiment on Italian, French and English languages10.1016/j.csl.2021.101261 ↗
14. de Vries, W., Bartelds, M., Nissim, M., and Wieling, M. (2021, January 1–6). Adapting Monolingual Models: Data can be Scarce when Language Similarity is High. Proceedings of the Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021, Association for Computational Linguistics, Online.10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.433 ↗
15. Oflazer, K., and Durgar El-Kahlout, İ. (2007). Exploring Different Representational Units in English-to-Turkish Statistical Machine Translation, Association for Computational Linguistics.10.3115/1626355.1626359 ↗
16. Bisazza, A., and Federico, M. (2009, January 1–2). Morphological pre-processing for Turkish to English statistical machine translation. Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Spoken Language Translation: Papers, Tokyo, Japan.
17. Mermer, C., Kaya, H., and Doğan, M.U. (2010, January 2–3). The TÜBİTAK-UEKAE statistical machine translation system for IWSLT 2010. Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Spoken Language Translation: Evaluation Campaign, Paris, France.
18. Yeniterzi, R., and Oflazer, K. (2010, January 11–16). Syntax-to-morphology mapping in factored phrase-based statistical machine translation from English to Turkish. Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Uppsala, Sweden.
19. Yılmaz, E., El-Kahlout, I.D., Aydın, B., Özil, Z.S., and Mermer, C. (2013, January 5–6). TÜBİTAK Turkish-English submissions for IWSLT 2013. Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Spoken Language Translation: Evaluation Campaign, Heidelberg, Germany.
20. A tree-based approach for English-to-Turkish translation10.3906/elk-1807-341 ↗
21. On integrating a language model into neural machine translation10.1016/j.csl.2017.01.014 ↗
22. Sennrich, R., Haddow, B., and Birch, A. (2015). Improving neural machine translation models with monolingual data. arXiv.10.18653/v1/P16-1009 ↗
23. Currey, A., Miceli-Barone, A.V., and Heafield, K. (2017, January 7–8). Copied monolingual data improves low-resource neural machine translation. Proceedings of the Second Conference on Machine Translation, Copenhagen, Denmark.10.18653/v1/W17-4715 ↗
24. Nguyen, T.Q., and Chiang, D. (2017). Transfer learning across low-resource, related languages for neural machine translation. arXiv.
25. Multi-way, multilingual neural machine translation10.1016/j.csl.2016.10.006 ↗
26. Ataman, D., Negri, M., Turchi, M., and Federico, M. (2017). Linguistically Motivated Vocabulary Reduction for Neural Machine Translation from Turkish to English. arXiv.10.1515/pralin-2017-0031 ↗
27. Pan, Y., Li, X., Yang, Y., and Dong, R. (2020). Dual-Source Transformer Model for Neural Machine Translation with Linguistic Knowledge. Preprints, 2020020273.10.20944/preprints202002.0273.v1 ↗
28. Yıldız, O.T., Solak, E., Görgün, O., and Ehsani, R. (2014, January 22–27). Constructing a Turkish-English parallel treebank. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), Baltimore, MD, USA.10.3115/v1/P14-2019 ↗
29. İlhami, S., Hüseyin, Ü., and HANBAY, D. (2021). Creating a Parallel Corpora for Turkish-English Academic Translations. Comput. Sci., 335–340.
30. Soares, F., Yamashita, G.H., and Anzanello, M.J. (2018, January 24–26). A parallel corpus of theses and dissertations abstracts. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Processing of the Portuguese Language, Canela, Brazil.10.1007/978-3-319-99722-3_35 ↗
31. Parallel corpora for medium density languages
32. Thompson, B., and Koehn, P. (2019, January 3–7). Vecalign: Improved sentence alignment in linear time and space. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), Hong Kong, China.10.18653/v1/D19-1136 ↗
33. The language demographics of amazon mechanical turk10.1162/tacl_a_00167 ↗
34. Massively multilingual sentence embeddings for zero-shot cross-lingual transfer and beyond10.1162/tacl_a_00288 ↗
35. de Santana Correia, A., and Colombini, E.L. (2022). Attention, please! A survey of neural attention models in deep learning. Artif. Intell. Rev., 1–88.10.1007/s10462-022-10148-x ↗
36. Yan, R., Li, J., Su, X., Wang, X., and Gao, G. (2022). Boosting the Transformer with the BERT Supervision in Low-Resource Machine Translation. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12147195 ↗
37. Mars, M. (2022). From Word Embeddings to Pre-Trained Language Models: A State-of-the-Art Walkthrough. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12178805 ↗
38. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., and Toutanova, K. (2018). Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv.
39. Beltagy, I., Lo, K., and Cohan, A. (2019). SciBERT: A pretrained language model for scientific text. arXiv.10.18653/v1/D19-1371 ↗
40. Skorokhodov, I., Rykachevskiy, A., Emelyanenko, D., Slotin, S., and Ponkratov, A. (2018, January 21). Semi-supervised neural machine translation with language models. Proceedings of the AMTA 2018 workshop on technologies for MT of low resource languages (LoResMT 2018), Boston, MA, USA.
41. Sennrich, R., Haddow, B., and Birch, A. (2015). Neural machine translation of rare words with subword units. arXiv.10.18653/v1/P16-1162 ↗
42. Britz, D., Goldie, A., Luong, M.T., and Le, Q. (2017). Massive exploration of neural machine translation architectures. arXiv.10.18653/v1/D17-1151 ↗
43. Neural machine translating from natural language to SPARQL10.1016/j.future.2020.12.013 ↗
44. Evaluating the state-of-the-art of end-to-end natural language generation: The e2e nlg challenge10.1016/j.csl.2019.06.009 ↗
45. Lavie, A., and Agarwal, A. (2007, January 23). METEOR: An automatic metric for MT evaluation with high levels of correlation with human judgments. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Prague, Czech Republic.10.3115/1626355.1626389 ↗
46. Snover, M., Dorr, B., Schwartz, R., Micciulla, L., and Makhoul, J. (2006, January 8–12). A study of translation edit rate with targeted human annotation. Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas: Technical Papers, Cambridge, MA, USA.
47. Behnke, M., and Heafield, K. (2020, January 16–20). Losing heads in the lottery: Pruning transformer attention in neural machine translation. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Online.10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.211 ↗
48. Pan, Y., Li, X., Yang, Y., and Dong, R. (2020). Morphological word segmentation on agglutinative languages for neural machine translation. arXiv.