Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment of North Carolina Type 2 Reclaimed Water for Agricultural Reuse
Source abstract
Abstract
As treated wastewater is increasingly used for agricultural purposes; questions remain about the microbiological quality of produce irrigated by these waters. This study conducted a quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) using microbial data collected from North Carolina Type 2 reclaimed waters, which have been proposed as supplemental irrigation waters. Reclaimed waters were collected from four different water reclamation facilities located in central North Carolina and evaluated for five representative pathogens from the three groups of microorganisms (bacteria, virus, and protozoan parasites). Using these data, produce consumption scenarios were evaluated using a variety of irrigation techniques, including spray irrigation, drip irrigation, and subsurface drip irrigation, and the disability adjusted life years (DALYs) that result from illness by each pathogen as a result of produce consumption were compared to the acceptable level set by the World Health Organization. Based on the types of crop irrigation examined in this study using NC Type 2 reclaimed water, there were irrigation conditions and certain pathogens for which the annual risk of infection was not always reduced below the acceptable DALY risk level of <1 × 10−6 set by the WHO. The risks of viral infection by adenoviruses groups A–F were below the acceptable risk level; however, for Salmonella spp., Cryptosporidium, and Giardia, the annual risk of infection was sometimes greater than would be considered acceptable.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fecal contamination and water quality · Wastewater Treatment and Reuse · Child Nutrition and Water Access
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
Department of Public Health, College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC 27506, USA
Funding
Water Resources Research Institute (WRRI) of North Carolina
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Water from (waste)water—The dependable water resource
2. Irrigation in developing countries using wastewater
3. North Caroloina Department of Natural Resources (2015, January 01). 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02U-Reclaimed Water. Available online: http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-%20environmental%20quality/chapter%2002%20-%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20u/subchapter%20u%20rules.html.
4. North Caroloina Department of Natural Resources (2015, January 01). 18C Water Supplies, Section .0100 Protection of Public Water Supplies. Available online: http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-%20environmental%20quality/chapter%2018%20-%20environmental%20health/subchapter%20c/subchapter%20c%20rules.pdf.
5. WHO (2006). W.H.O. Guidelines for Safe Use of Wastewater Excreta and Greywater, Wastewater Use in Agriculture, World Health Organization.
6. Incorporating method recovery uncertainties in stochastic estimates of raw water protozoan concentrations for QMRA10.2166/wh.2007.142 ↗
7. Quantitative microbial risk assessment models for consumption of raw vegetables irrigated with reclaimed water10.1128/AEM.72.5.3284-3290.2006 ↗
8. Minimizing health risks during secondary effluent application via subsurface drip irrigation10.2166/wst.2010.502 ↗
9. Tertiary treatment and dual disinfection to improve microbial quality of reclaimed water for potable and non-potable reuse: A case study of facilities in North Carolina10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.239 ↗
10. Bailey, E.S., Hopkins, M., Casanova, L., and Sobsey, M.D. (2021). Evaluating Fecal Indicator and Pathogen Relationships in Sewage Impacted Surface Waters to Blend with Reclaimed Water for Potable Reuse in North Carolina. Pathogens, 10.10.3390/pathogens10121603 ↗
11. Multistate evaluation of an ultrafiltration-based procedure for simultaneous recovery of enteric microbes in 100-liter tap water samples10.1128/AEM.02713-06 ↗
12. Ultrafiltration-based techniques for rapid and simultaneous concentration of multiple microbe classes from 100-L tap water samples10.1016/j.mimet.2008.02.014 ↗
13. Rapid bacteriophage sedimentation in the presence of polyethylene glycol and its application to large-scale virus purification10.1016/0042-6822(70)90218-7 ↗
14. Real-time RT-PCR for norovirus screening in shellfish10.1016/j.jviromet.2004.08.023 ↗
15. Quantitative real-time PCR assays for detection of human adenoviruses and identification of serotypes 40 and 4110.1128/AEM.71.6.3131-3136.2005 ↗
16. Office of Water (2012). Method Cryptosporidium and Giardia in Water by Filtration/IMS/FA.
17. Office of Research and Development′s National Center for Environmental Assessment (2011). Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition.
18. Risk assessment of consuming agricultural products irrigated with reclaimed wastewater: An exposure model
19. Evaluation of the California Wastewater Reclamation Criteria using enteric virus monitoring data10.2166/wst.1992.0595 ↗
20. Efficiency of natural systems for removal of bacteria and pathogenic parasites from wastewater10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.02.039 ↗
21. Brooks, S. (1995). Principles of exposure assessment. Environmental Medicine, Mosby Year Book.
22. Effluent Reuse by Trickle Irrigation10.2166/wst.1991.0240 ↗
23. Effect of route of inoculation on experimental respiratory viral disease in volunteers and evidence for airborne transmission10.1128/br.30.3.517-529.1966 ↗
24. The infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum in healthy volunteers10.1056/NEJM199503303321304 ↗
25. Risk assessment and control of waterborne giardiasis10.2105/AJPH.81.6.709 ↗
26. The growth of micro-organisms in vivo with particular reference to the relation between dose and latent period
27. Estimation of risk due to low doses of microorganisms: A comparison of alternative methodologies10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113662 ↗
28. WHO (2011). W.H.O. Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality, WHO. [4th ed.].
29. A probabilistic QMRA of Salmonella in direct agricultural reuse of treated municipal wastewater10.2166/wst.2015.093 ↗
30. Risk assessment of cryptosporidium and giardia in water irrigating fresh produce in Mexico10.4315/0362-028X-72.10.2184 ↗
31. Direct and indirect QMRA of infectious Cryptosporidium oocysts in reclaimed water10.2166/wh.2012.082 ↗
32. Prevalence of common enteric viruses in municipal wastewater treatment plants and their health risks arising from wastewater reuse10.2166/bgs.2021.012 ↗
33. Microbial and chemical risk from reclaimed water use for residential irrigation