journal article·2017-03Open access

Numerical simulation and experimental validation of a multi-step deep drawing process

Matías Pacheco, Diego Celentano, Claudio García-Herrera, Julio Méndez, Fernando Flores

Abstract

This paper presents the numerical simulation of an industrial multi-step deep drawing process. A large strain finite element formulation including a hyperelastic elastoplastic constitutive model and a contact-friction law is used to this end where the steel sheet material parameters considered in the analysis are previously derived through a characterization procedure of its mechanical response. The numerical predictions of the final shape and thickness distribution of the blank are compared and discussed with available experimental values measured at the end of three successive drawing steps. In addition, a plastic work-based damage index is used to assess failure occurrence during the process. The damage values computed at the end of the drawing process are found to be lower than that corresponding to rupture in the tensile test, considered here as the threshold of failure, confirming, as observed experimentally, that neither fracture nor necking is developed in the blank during the whole drawing process. Finally, the possibility to carry out a reduced two-step drawing process, obtained by merging the second and third steps of the three-step process, is precluded since the damage criterion predicts in this case excessively large values that indicate that failure may occur in specific zones of the sheet.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Dixit US, Joshi RN, Dabim JM (2011) Incorporation of material behavior in modeling of metal forming and machining processes: a review. Mater Des 32:3655–367010.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.049 ↗
2. Hill R (1948) A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc R Soc Lond A193:281–29710.1098/rspa.1948.0045 ↗
3. Salehinia I, Shahani AR (2009) Effect of sheet anisotropy on the wear in deep-drawing process of a cylindrical cup. Int J Mech Sci 51:856–86810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.09.025 ↗
4. García C, Celentano D, Flores F, Ponthot JP, Oliva O (2006) Numerical modelling and experimental validation of steel deep drawing processes Part II. Applications. J Mater Process Technol 172:461–47110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.11.016 ↗
5. Elgueta M (2002) Ductile damage analysis of sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 121:148–15610.1016/S0924-0136(01)01232-8 ↗
6. Lou Y, Huh H (2013) Evaluation of ductile fracture criteria in a general three-dimensional stress state considering the stress triaxiality and the Lode parameter. Acta Mech Solida Sin 26(6):642–65810.1016/S0894-9166(14)60008-2 ↗
7. Yu Y, Haibo W, Min W (2011) Prediction of fracture in press bend forming of aluminum alloy high-stiffener integral panels. Comput Mater Sci 50:2232–224410.1016/j.commatsci.2011.02.034 ↗
8. Flores F, Oñate E (2001) A basic thin Sheet triangle with only translational DOFs for large strain plasticity. Int J Numer Methods Eng 51:57–8310.1002/nme.147 ↗
9. Flores F (2000) Un algoritmo de contacto para el análisis explícito de procesos de embutición. Revista Internacional de Métodos Numéricos para Cálculo y Diseño en Ingeniería 16:421–432 (in Spanish)
10. (2014) STAMPACK: a general finite element system for sheet stamping forming problems. www.quantech.es . Accessed 2014
11. Clift SE, Hartley P, Sturgess CEN, Rowe GW (1990) Fracture prediction in plastic deformation processes. Int J Mech Sci 32:1–1710.1016/0020-7403(90)90148-C ↗
12. DIN 1623 Specification (1987) Cold reduced sheet and strip technical delivery conditions, mild unalloyed steels for vitreous annealing. Deutsche Norm, Deutsches Institut für Normung
13. ASTM E8-88 Specification (1988) Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, American Society for Testing and Materials
14. DIN 50145 Specification (1988) Testing of metallic materials. Deutsche Norm, Deutsches Institut für Normung
15. ASTM E646-00 Specification (2000) Standard test method for tensile strain hardening exponents (n-values) of metallic sheet materials. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, American Society for Testing and Materials
16. Bridgman P (1952) Studies in large plastic and fracture. McGraw-Hill Book Company, London
17. García C, Celentano D, Flores F, Ponthot JP (2006) Numerical modelling and experimental validation of steel deep drawing processes Part I. Material characterization. J Mater Process Technol 172:451–46010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.11.015 ↗
18. Cabezas E, Celentano D (2004) Experimental and numerical analysis of the tensile test using sheet specimens. Finite Elem Anal Des 40(5–6):555–57510.1016/S0168-874X(03)00096-9 ↗
19. Celentano D, Cabezas E, García C, Monsalve A (2004) Characterization of the mechanical behaviour of materials in the tensile test: experiments and simulation. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 12:425–44410.1088/0965-0393/12/4/S09 ↗
20. Celentano D, Cabezas E, García C (2005) Analysis of the Bridgman procedure to characterize the mechanical behavior of materials in the tensile test: experiments and simulation. ASME J Appl Mech 72(1):149–15210.1115/1.1827243 ↗
21. ASTM E517-87 Specification (1988) Plastic strain ratio R for sheet metal. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, American Society for Testing and Materials
22. CTI, (2014). www.cti.cl . Accessed 2014