journal article·2010-03

Blow forming of AZ31 magnesium alloy at elevated temperatures

Donato Sorgente, Leonardo Daniele Scintilla, Gianfranco Palumbo, Luigi Tricarico

Publisher page

Abstract

In this work, the forming behaviour of a commercial sheet of AZ31B magnesium alloy at elevated temperatures is investigated and reported. The experimental activity is performed in two phases. The first phase consists in free bulging test and the second one in analysing the ability of the sheet in filling a closed die. Different pressure and temperature levels are applied. In free bulging tests, the specimen dome height is used as characterizing parameter; in the same test, the strain rate sensitivity index is calculated using an analytical approach. Thus, appropriate forming parameters, such as temperature and pressure, are individuated and used for subsequent forming tests. In the second phase, forming tests in closed die with a prismatic shape cavity are performed. The influence of relevant process parameters concerning forming results in terms of cavity filling, fillet radii on the final specimen profile are analysed. Closed die forming tests put in evidence how the examined commercial magnesium sheet can successfully be formed in complicated geometries if process parameters are adequately chosen.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Vulcan M, Siegert K, Banabic D (2004) The Influence of Pulsating Strain Rates on the Superplastic Deformation Behaviour of Al-Alloy AA5083 Investigated by Means of Cone Test. Mater. Sci. Forum Vols. 447–448:139–14410.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.447-448.139 ↗
2. Krajewski PE, Schroth JG (2007) Overview of Quick Plastic Forming Technology. Mater. Sci. Forum Vols. 551–552:3–1210.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.551-552.3 ↗
3. Wu X, Liu Y, Hao H (2001) High strain rate superplasticity and microstructure study of a magnesium alloy. Mater. Sci. Forum Vols. 357–359:363–37010.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.357-359.363 ↗
4. Jin Q, Wu H (2005) An Experimental Study on Superplastic Behaviors of Magnesium Alloy Sheet. Mater. Sci. Forum Vols. 475–479:2913–291810.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.475-479.2913 ↗
5. Watanabe H, Fukusumi M (2008) Mechanical properties and texture of a superplastically deformed AZ31 magnesium alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 477:153–16110.1016/j.msea.2007.05.012 ↗
6. Blandin JJ (2007) Superplastic Forming of Magnesium Alloys: Production of Microstructures, Superplastic Properties, Cavitation Behaviour. Mater. Sci. Forum Vols. 551–552:211–21710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.551-552.211 ↗
7. Wu X, Liu Y (2002) Superplasticity of coarse-grained magnesium alloy. Scr. Mater. Vol. 46:269–27410.1016/S1359-6462(01)01234-9 ↗
8. Sorgente D, Palumbo G, Tricarico L (2007) Material superplastic parameters evaluation by a jump pressure blow forming test. Key Eng. Mater. Vol. 344:119–12610.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.344.119 ↗
9. Ridley N, Bate PS, Zhang B (2005) Material modelling data for superplastic forming optimization. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 410–411:100–10410.1016/j.msea.2005.08.108 ↗
10. Chung SW, Higashi K, Kimb WJ (2004) Superplastic gas pressure forming of fine-grained AZ61 magnesium alloy sheet. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 372:15–2010.1016/j.msea.2003.08.125 ↗
11. Kim WJ, Chung SW, Chung CS, Kum D (2001) Superplasticity in thin magnesium alloy sheets and deformation mechanism maps for magnesium alloys at elevated temperatures. Acta mater. Vol. 49:3337–334510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00008-8 ↗
12. El-Morsy AW, Manabe KI (2002) FE simulation of rectangular box forming using material charcteristics from the multi-dome forming test. J. Mater. Process. Technol. Vols. 125–126:772–77710.1016/S0924-0136(02)00389-8 ↗
13. Carrino L, Giuliano G, Polini W (2003) A method to characterise superplastic materials in comparison with alternative methods. J. Mater. Process. Technol. Vol. 138:417–42210.1016/S0924-0136(03)00110-9 ↗
14. Sorgente D, Tricarico L (2007) Analysis of Different Specimen Geometries for Tensile Tests in Superplastic Conditions for an Aluminium Alloy. Mater. Sci. Forum Vols. 551–552:123–12810.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.551-552.123 ↗
15. Cheng JH (1996) The determination of material parameters from superplastic inflation tests. J. Mater. Process. Technol. Vol. 58:233–24610.1016/0924-0136(95)02128-0 ↗
16. Jovane F (1968) An approximate analysis of the superplastic forming of a thin circular diaphragm: theory and experiments. Int. J. Mech. Sci. Vol. 10:403–42710.1016/0020-7403(68)90005-2 ↗
17. Enikeev FU, Kruglov AA (1995) An analysis of the superplastic forming of a thin circular diaphragm. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 37(5):473–48310.1016/0020-7403(94)00081-T ↗
18. Khraisheh MK, Abu-Farha FK, Weinmann KJ (2007) Investigation of Post-Superplastic Forming Properties of AZ31 Magnesium Alloy. CIRP Annals — Manufacturing Technology 56(1):289–29210.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.067 ↗
19. Hwang YM, Lay HS (2003) Study on superplastic blow-forming in a rectangular closed-die. J. Mater. Process. Technol. Vol. 140:426–43110.1016/S0924-0136(03)00729-5 ↗