Automatic quality assessment of FE draping simulation results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Wolff I (2016) https://www.sme.org/technologies/articles/2016/june/composites-for-aerospace-the-latest-developments/
2. Wang C, Wei X, Jiang X (2024) An automated defect detection method for optimizing industrial quality inspection. Eng Appl Artif Intell 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.10738710.1016/j.engappai.2023.107387 ↗
3. Akundi A, Reyna M (2021) A machine vision based automated quality control system for product dimensional analysis. Procedia Comput Sci 185:127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.05.01410.1016/j.procs.2021.05.014 ↗
4. Schuh G, Gützlaff A, Thomas K, Welsing M (2021) Machine learning based defect detection in a low automated assembly environment. Procedia CIRP 104:265–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.04510.1016/j.procir.2021.11.045 ↗
5. Ding M, Wu B, Xu J, Kasule AN, Zuo H (2022) Visual inspection of aircraft skin: Automated pixel-level defect detection by instance segmentation. Chinese J Aeronautics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2022.05.00210.1016/j.cja.2022.05.002 ↗
6. Gong Y, Shao H, Luo J, Li Z (2020) A deep transfer learning model for inclusion defect detection of aeronautics composite materials. Composite Structures 252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11268110.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112681 ↗
7. Séguin-Charbonneau L, Walter J, Théroux LD, Scheed L, Beausoleil A, Masson B (2021) Automated defect detection for ultrasonic inspection of cfrp aircraft components. NDT E Int 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.10247810.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102478 ↗
8. Osterberger J, Maier F, Hinterhölzl RM (2022) Application of the abaqus *fabric model to approximate the draping behavior of ud prepregs based on suited mechanical characterization. Front Mater 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2022.86547710.3389/fmats.2022.865477 ↗
9. Kärger L, Galkin S, Kunze E, Gude M, Schäfer B (2021) Prediction of forming effects in UD-NCF by macroscopic forming simulation-Capabilities and limitations10.25518/esaform21.355 ↗
10. Sun X, Belnoue JPH, Thompson A, Said BE, Hallett SR (2022) Dry textile forming simulations: A benchmarking exercise. Front Mater 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2022.83182010.3389/fmats.2022.831820 ↗
11. Yu F, Chen S, Harper LT, Warrior NA (2021) Double diaphragm forming simulation using a global-to-local modelling strategy for detailed defect detection in large structures. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufact 147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10645710.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106457 ↗
12. Viisainen JV, Sutcliffe MPF (2021) Characterising the variability in wrinkling during the preforming of non-crimp fabrics. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufact 149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10653610.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106536 ↗
13. Pourkaramdel Z, Fekri-Ershad S, Nanni L (2022) Fabric defect detection based on completed local quartet patterns and majority decision algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.11682710.1016/j.eswa.2022.116827 ↗
14. Peitz A, Emonts M, Fischer K, Brecher C (2023) Defect detection for large-series automated fibre placement using a neural network-assisted machine vision approach. Procedia CIRP 120:1439–1444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.09.19010.1016/j.procir.2023.09.190 ↗
15. Sabuncuoglu B, Tanabi H, Soete J, Lomov S (2020) Micro-ct analysis of deviations in fiber orientation and composite stiffness near the microvascular channels embedded in glass-fiber reinforced composites. Composite Struct 237:111896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11189610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111896 ↗
16. Bardl G, Nocke A, Cherif C, Pooch M, Schulze M, Heuer H, Schiller M, Kupke R, Klein M (2016) Automated detection of yarn orientation in 3d-draped carbon fiber fabrics and preforms from eddy current data. Composites Part B: Eng 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.04010.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.040 ↗
17. Palfinger W, Thumfart S, Eitzinger C (2011) Photometric stereo on carbon fiber surfaces
18. Malhan RK, Shembekar AV, Kabir AM, Bhatt PM, Shah B, Zanio S, Nutt S, Gupta SK (2021) Automated planning for robotic layup of composite prepreg. Robot Comput-Integrated Manufact 6710.1016/j.rcim.2020.102020 ↗
19. Mohammed U, Lekakou C, Bader MG (2000) Experimental studies and analysis of the draping of woven fabrics. Composites: Part A 3110.1016/S1359-835X(00)00080-4 ↗
20. Harrison P, Gomes R, Curado-Correia N (2013) Press forming a 0/90 cross-ply advanced thermoplastic composite using the double-dome benchmark geometry. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufact 54:56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.06.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2013.06.014 ↗
21. Nasri M, Garnier C, Abbassi F, Labanieh AR, Dalverny O, Zghal A (2019) Hybrid approach for woven fabric modelling based on discrete hypoelastic behaviour and experimental validation. Composite Struct 209:992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.08110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.081 ↗
22. Vanclooster K, Lomov SV, Verpoest I (2009) Experimental validation of forming simulations of fabric reinforced polymers using an unsymmetrical mould configuration. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufact 40:530–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.02.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2009.02.005 ↗
23. Bai R, Colmars J, Chen B, Naouar N, Boisse P (2022) The fibrous shell approach for the simulation of composite draping with a relevant orientation of the normals. Composite Struct 285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11520210.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115202 ↗
24. Rashidi A, Montazerian H, Milani AS (2021) Slip-bias extension test: A characterization tool for understanding and modeling the effect of clamping conditions in forming of woven fabrics. Composite Struct 260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11352910.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113529 ↗
25. Viisainen JV, Yu F, Codolini A, Chen S, Harper LT, Sutcliffe MPF (2023) Rapidly predicting the effect of tool geometry on the wrinkling of biaxial NCFs during composites manufacturing using a deep learning surrogate model. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11053610.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110536 ↗
26. Pfrommer J, Zimmerling C, Liu J, Kärger L, Henning F, Beyerer J (2018) Optimisation of manufacturing process parameters using deep neural networks as surrogate models. Procedia CIRP 72:426–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.04610.1016/j.procir.2018.03.046 ↗
27. Wu D, Hartmann O (2020) Automatic evaluation of ls-dyna ®simulation results using statistical database and python
28. Smirnov A, Shilov N, Ponomarev A, Streichert T, Gramling S, Streich T (2020) Validating results of 3d finite element simulation for mechanical stress evaluation using machine learning techniques. In: IN4PL 2020 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovative Intelligent Industrial Production and Logistics, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.5220/001010850013002310.5220/0010108500130023 ↗
29. Sun W, Ma Q, Chen S (2009) A framework for automated finite element analysis with an ontology-based approach. J Mech Sci Technol 23:3209–3220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-009-1005-010.1007/s12206-009-1005-0 ↗
30. Kärger L, Galkin S, Dörr D, Poppe C (2020) Capabilities of macroscopic forming simulation for large-scale forming processes of dry and impregnated textiles. Procedia Manufact 47:140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.155. 23rd International Conference on Material Forming10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.155 ↗
31. Keller S, Maier F, Blies PM, Hinterhölzl R.M (2023) Creating training data for surrogate models using fe draping simulation. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM23)
32. Pickett AK (2018) Process and Mechanical Modelling of Engineering Composites. University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart
33. ABAQUS I (2008) ABAQUS/Standard Theory Manual, Version 6.8, Providence, RI, USA
34. Wang J, Zhang X (2016) Twinning effects on strength and plasticity of metallic materials. MRS Bullet 41(4):274–281. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2016.6710.1557/mrs.2016.67 ↗
35. Rozant O, Bourban P-E, Månson J-AE (2000) Drapability of dry textile fabrics for stampable thermoplastic preforms. Composites: Part A 31:1167–117710.1016/S1359-835X(00)00100-7 ↗
36. Thor M, Sause MGR, Hinterhölzl RM (2020) Mechanisms of origin and classification of out-of-plane fiber waviness in composite materials – A review. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs403013010.3390/jcs4030130 ↗
37. Yen J-C, Chang F-J, Chang S (1995) A new criterion for automatic multilevel thresholding. IEEE Trans Image Process 4:370–378. https://doi.org/10.1109/83.36647210.1109/83.366472 ↗
38. Gillies S, et al (2007) Shapely: manipulation and analysis of geometric objects
39. Stojiljković M (2023) NumPy, SciPy, and pandas: Correlation With Python. https://realpython.com/numpy-scipy-pandas-correlation-python/#pearson-correlation-coefficient
40. Simon J, Hamila N, Comas-Cardona S, Binetruy C (2024) A yarn-scale woven fabric model including significant slippage formulated within the arbitrary lagrangian eulerian framework. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 420:116741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2023.11674110.1016/j.cma.2023.116741 ↗