journal article·2013-04-07

On the effect of numerical noise in approximate optimization of forming processes using numerical simulations

J. H. Wiebenga, A. H. van den Boogaard

Publisher page

Abstract

The coupling of Finite Element (FE) simulations with approximate optimization techniques is becoming increasingly popular in forming industry. By doing so, it is implicitly assumed that the optimization objective and possible constraints are smooth functions of the design variables and, in case of robust optimization, design and noise variables. However, non-linear FE simulations are known to introduce numerical noise caused by the discrete nature of the simulation algorithms, e.g. errors caused by re-meshing, time-step adjustments or contact algorithms. The subsequent usage of metamodels based on such noisy data reduces the prediction quality of the optimization routine and is known to even magnify the numerical errors. This work provides an approach to handle noisy numerical data in approximate optimization of forming processes, covering several fundamental research questions in dealing with numerical noise. First, the deteriorating effect of numerical noise on the prediction quality of several well-known metamodeling techniques is demonstrated using an analytical test function. Next, numerical noise is quantified and its effect is minimized by the application of local approximation and regularization techniques. A general approximate optimization strategy is subsequently presented and coupling with a sequential update algorithm is proposed. The strategy is demonstrated by the sequential deterministic and robust optimization of 2 industrial metal forming processes i.e. a V-bending application and a cup-stretching application. Although numerical noise is often neglected in practice, both applications in this work show that the general awareness of its presence is highly important to increase the overall accuracy of optimization results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Barthelemy JFM, Haftka RT (1993) Approximation concepts for optimum structural design - a review. Struct Multidiscip Optim 5:129–14410.1007/BF01743349 ↗
2. Simpson TW, Toropov V, Balabanov V, Viana FAC (2008) Design and analysis of computer experiments in multidisciplinary design optimization: a review of how far we have come - or not. In 12th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, MAO, art. no. 2008–580210.2514/6.2008-5802 ↗
3. Wang H, Li G (2010) Sheet forming optimization based on least square support vector regression and intelligent sampling approach. Int J Mater Form 3:9–1210.1007/s12289-010-0694-3 ↗
4. Jansson T, Andersson A, Nilsson L (2005) Optimization of draw-in for an automotive sheet metal part: An evaluation using surrogate models and response surfaces. J Mater Process Technol 159:426–43410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.06.011 ↗
5. Ejday M, Fourment L (2010) Metamodel assisted evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimization of non-steady metal forming problems. Int J Mater Form 3:5–810.1007/s12289-010-0689-0 ↗
6. Chenot J-L, Bouchard P-O, Fourment L, Lasne P, Roux E (2011) Optimization of metal forming processes for improving final mechanical strength Computational Plasticity XI - Fundamentals and Applications, COMPLAS XI, pp 42–55
7. Clees T, Steffes-lai D, Helbig M, Sun D-Z (2010) Statistical analysis and robust optimization of forming processes and forming-to-crash process chains. Int J Mater Form 3:45–4810.1007/s12289-010-0703-6 ↗
8. Li YQ, Cui ZS, Ruan XY, Zhang DJ (2006) Cae-based six sigma robust optimization for deep-drawing sheet metal process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 30:631–63710.1007/s00170-005-0121-y ↗
9. Strano M (2008) A technique for fem optimization under reliability constraint of process variables in sheet metal forming. Int J Mater Form 1:13–2010.1007/s12289-008-0001-8 ↗
10. Kleiber M, Knabel J, Rojek J (2004) Response surface method for probabilistic assessment of metal forming failures. Int J Numer Anal Model 60:51–67
11. Oden JT, Belytschko T, Fish J, Hughes TJR, Johnson C, Keyes D, Laub A, Petzold L, Srolovitz D, Yip S (2006) Simulation based engineering science. Technical report, National Science Foundation
12. Tekkaya AE, Martins PAF (2009) Accuracy, reliability and validity of finite element analysis in metal forming: a user’s perspective. J Eng Comput 26:1026–105610.1108/02644400910996880 ↗
13. van Keulen F, Toropov VV (1997) New developments in structural optimization using adaptive mesh refinement and multi-point approximations. Eng Optim 29:217–23410.1080/03052159708940994 ↗
14. Giunta AA, Dudley JM, Narducci R, Grossman B, Haftka RT, Mason WH, Watson LT (1994) Noisy aerodynamic response and smooth approximations in hsct design. AIAA J Proc 5th Symp Multidiscip Struct Optim 94–4376-CP:1117–1128
15. Papila M, Haftka RT (2000) Response surface approximations: Noise, error repair and modeling errors. AIAA J 38:2336–234310.2514/2.903 ↗
16. Goel T, Haftka RT, Papila M, Shyy W (2006) Generalized pointwise bias error bounds for response surface approximations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 65:2035–205910.1002/nme.1532 ↗
17. Sacks J, Welch WJ, Mitchell TJ, Wynn HP (1989) Design and analysis of computer experiments. Stat Sci 4:409–42310.1214/ss/1177012413 ↗
18. Jones DR, Schonlau M, Welch WJ (1998) Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. Global Optim 13:455–49210.1023/A:1008306431147 ↗
19. Santner T, Williams B, Notz W (2003) The design and analysis of computer experiments. Springer–Verlag, New York10.1007/978-1-4757-3799-8 ↗
20. Toropov V, van Keulen F, Markine V, de Boer H (1996) Multipoint approximations for structural optimization problems with noisy response functions. AIAA J Proc Symp Multidiscip Struct Optim A96-38701:10–31
21. Siem AYD, den Hertog D (2007) Kriging models that are robust with respect to simulation errors. CentER discussion paper No. 200768, ISSN 0924-7815, Tilburg University, p 1–29
22. Bishop CM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer Science + Business Media, New York
23. Bonte MHA, Fourment L, Do TT, van den Boogaard AH, Huetink J (2010) Optimization of forging processes using finite element simulations : A comparison of sequential approximate optimization and other algorithms. J Struct Multidisc Optim 42(5):797–81010.1007/s00158-010-0545-3 ↗
24. Wiebenga JH, van den Boogaard AH, Klaseboer G (2012) Sequential robust optimization of a v-bending process using numerical simulations. J Struct Multidisc Optim 46:137–15310.1007/s00158-012-0761-0 ↗
25. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (2007) Numerical recipes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
26. Tikhonov AN, Arsenin VY (1977) Solutions of ill-posed problems. Wiley, New York
27. Golub GH, Heath M, Wahba G (1979) Generalized cross-validation as a method choosing a good ridge parameter. Technometrics 21:215–22310.1080/00401706.1979.10489751 ↗
28. Craven P, Whaba G (1979) Smoothing noisy data with spline functions. Numer Math 31:377–40310.1007/BF01404567 ↗
29. Savitzky A, Golay MJE (1964) Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal Chem 36:1627–163910.1021/ac60214a047 ↗
30. Schonlau M (1997) Computer experiments and global optimization. PhD thesis. University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
31. DiekA (2012) In-house finite element code for forming simulations of the University of Twente. http://www.utwente.nl/ctw/tm/research/NSM/software/dieka/ . Enschede, the Netherlands
32. Myers RH, Montgomery DC (2002) Response surface methodology. Wiley, New York
33. MacKay DJC (1992) Bayesian interpolation. Neural Comput 4:415–44710.1162/neco.1992.4.3.415 ↗
34. Lophaven SN, Nielsen HB, Sondergaard J (2002) Dace: a Matlab Kriging Toolbox Version 2.0. Technical Report imm-tr-2002-12. Technical report. Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
35. Forrester A, Sobester A, Keane A (2008) Engineering design via surrogate modelling: a practical guide. Wiley, New York10.1002/9780470770801 ↗
36. Forrester A, Keane AJ, Bresslo NW (2006) Design and analysis of noisy computer experiments. AIAA J 44:2331–233910.2514/1.20068 ↗
37. Orr MJL (1996) Introduction to radial basis function networks. Technical report. University of Edinburgh, UK
38. de Veaux RDD, Schumi J, Schweinsberg J, Ungar LH (1998) Prediction intervals for neural networks via nonlinear regression. Technometrics 40:273–282
39. Matlab Version 7.13.0 (2012) The MathWorks Inc, Natick Massachusetts, USA