journal article·2010-04

Anisotropic and Dissipative Elasto-Plastic Materials with Damaged Structure

Sanda Cleja-Tigoiu

Publisher page

Abstract

The proposed framework for anisotropic damage coupled to finite elasto-plasticity is based on the multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient into its elastic (reversible) and plastic components, which involves the existence of a tensorial damage variable, Fd, i.e. F = FeFdFp. Fd appears like a kinematic variable, whose rate in time produces the variation in internal power dissipated during the irreversible process. The material is characterized by an elastic type constitutive equations, which is dependent on Fd, with respect to the stress free and damaged configuration. Fp and Fd are described by the evolution equations written with respect to the stress free and undamaged configuration. The dissipative nature for the irreversible behavior is modeled by the requirement to be satisfied the principle of the free energy imbalance, on the isothermal processes. The constitutive and evolution equations are derived to be compatible with the free energy imbalance.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Elasticity and Material Modeling · Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (10)

Show source-provided references
1. Brünig, M. (2003) An anisotropic ductile damage model based on irreversible thermodynamics, Int.J. of Plasticity, 19, 1679–1713.10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00114-6 ↗
2. Brünig, M. and Ricci, S. (2005) Nonlocal continuum theory of anisotropically damaged metals, Int.J. of Plasticity, 21, 1346–1382.10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.006 ↗
3. Cleja-Ţigoiu, S. (1990) Large elasto-plastic deformations of materials with relaxed configurations-I. Constitutive assumptions, II. Role of the complementary plastic factor. Int. J. Engng. Sci. 28, 171–180, 273–284.
4. Cleja-Ţigoiu, S. and Soós E. (1990) Elastoplastic models with relaxed configurations and internal state variables. Appl. Mech. Rev. 43, 131–151.
5. Cleja-Ţigoiu, S. (2002) Couple stresses and non-Riemannian plastic connection in finite elasto-plasticity. ZAMP 53, 996–1013.10.1007/PL00012625 ↗
6. Cleja-Ţigoiu, S. (2007) Material forces in finite elasto-plasticity with continuously distributed dislocations. Int. J. Fracture 147, 67–81.10.1007/s10704-007-9131-0 ↗
7. M. Ekh M., R. Lillbacka and K. Runesson (2004) A model framework for anisotropic damage coupled to crystal (visco)plasticity. Int. J. Plast. 20 2143–2159.10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.04.007 ↗
8. Gurtin M. E. (2002) A gradient theory of single-crystal viscoplasticity that accounts for geometrically necessary dislocations. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 50 5–32.10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00104-1 ↗
9. Menzel A., Ekh M., Steinmann P. and Runesson K. (2001) Anisotropic Damage Coupled to plasticity: Modelling Based on the Effective Configuration Concept, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 1 1–25.
10. de Borst, R., Pamin, J. and Geers, M. (1999), On coupled gradient-dependent plasticity ans damage theories with a view to localization analysis, Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids 18, 939–962.10.1016/S0997-7538(99)00114-X ↗