journal article·2022-02-16Open access

Probability-Based Crack Width Estimation Model for Flexural Members of Underground RC Box Culverts

Sang-Hyo Kim, Syed Haider Ali Shah, Sang-Kyun Woo, Inyeop Chu, Chungwook Sim

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 4

Abstract

Crack control for slabs and beams in current design practices in Korea are based on the Frosch’s model, which is adapted in ACI 318. It is more difficult to have consistent quality control in underground construction sites, such as the RC box culverts used for electric power distribution built below the ground level. There are more discrepancies between the as-built dimensions and the design dimensions provided in drawings in these structures. Due to this variability in construction error, the crack widths measured in such structures have higher potential to have more differences than the calculated values. Although crack control is a serviceability concern, if the owner chooses to have a target crack width that needs better control, crack width estimations can be improved by considering such construction variability. The probability-based crack width model suggested in this study will allow minimizing the discrepancies between the measured and calculated crack widths and provide reliable estimations of crack widths. Typical size of slabs and beams ranging between 300 mm (12 in.) to 500 mm (20 in.) used in underground RC box culverts in Korea were tested under the four-point bending test program. The thicker specimens had smaller bar spacings which created more cracks with smaller crack widths. However, with smaller crack widths generated in these specimens, there were more errors between the measurements and calculated values. From site investigations in Korea, the thickness of slabs in underground box culverts varied the most among all parameters. As a result, the bottom concrete covers had the highest variability. Bottom concrete covers and bar spacings are the two most important parameters in concrete crack control. A probability-based crack width estimation model for flexural members was developed in this study to consider this construction variability. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate the probabilistic characteristics of the design surface crack widths with a target width of either 0.3 mm (12 mils) or 0.5 mm (20 mils). The probabilistic models of design variables included in the crack width estimation model were generated based on field-collected information from construction sites in Korea. Because the surface crack widths in RC flexural members are sensitive to the construction errors of concrete cover depths, and since there are differences between the assumed and actual stress distribution closer to the reinforcing bars, the probability of having surface cracks of 0.3 mm width (12 mils) is found to be quite high, such as 89% at the positive moment region (mid-span, bottom surface) of the top slab in RC box culverts and 45% for the negative moment region (support area, top surface) of the top slab with current design practice. In order to ensure crack widths to be smaller than the design target width, probability-based crack width factors are recommended in this study to improve estimations depending on the selected target reliability levels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea

KEPCO Research Institute, Daejeon 34056, Korea

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Omaha, NE 68182, USA

Funding

Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy · Korea Electric Power Research Institute

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Cracking in reinforced concrete flexural members
2. Crack width and crack spacing in reinforced concrete members
3. Maximum crack width in reinforced concrete flexural members
4. Further studies on flexural crack control in structural slab systems
5. The prediction of crack widths in hardened concrete
6. Cracking analysis based on slip and bond stresses
7. The effect of thick concrete cover on the maximum flexural crack width under service load
8. (1995). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete: (ACI 318-95) and Commentary (Standard No. ACI Committee 318).
9. (1985). Structural Use of Concrete, Part 2: Code of Practice for Special Circumstances (Standard No. BS 8110-2).
10. Park, R., and Paulay, T. (1975). Reinforced Concrete Structures, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470172834 ↗
11. (2001). 224R-01: Control of Cracking in Concrete Structures (Reapproved 2008) (Standard No. ACI Committee 224).
12. An analytical model for crack control in reinforced concrete elements under combined forces10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.09.002 ↗
13. Cracking analysis of RC members using polynomial strain distribution function10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00112-2 ↗
14. Long- and short-term serviceability behavior of reinforced concrete beams: Mechanics models for deflections and crack widths10.1002/suco.201700022 ↗
15. Kim, S.H., Boldoo, T., Kim, D.Y., Chu, I., and Woo, S.K. (2021). Probabilistic Moment Capacity Models of RC Slab Members for Underground Box Culverts. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11188520 ↗
16. Another look at cracking and crack control in reinforced concrete
17. (2019). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete: (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (Standard No. ACI Committee 318).
18. High strength bars as concrete reinforcement, Part 4, Control of cracking
19. The prediction and control of flexural cracking in reinforced concrete members. Cracking, deflection, and ultimate load of concrete slab systems
20. CEB (1992). CEB-FIP Model. Code 90, CEB.
21. (2004). Eurocode 2–1992, Design of Concrete Structures, Part 1.1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings (Standard No. EN1992-1-1).